| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Amateur Creampies
(1)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from Rick Lee:
"Few updates at irregular intervals"
I dare you or anyone to find 1 week in the last 12 years that this site did not update with a new scene. If anyone can find it, I'll give you $100.
|
02-17-13 02:13am
|
Reply
2
|
Tainster
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jaimes:
(petefountain's Reply)
petefountain:thank you for your response. Indeed, I did not mean to offend anyone. But I do think that C.F.N.M should stay in it's own backyard, so to speak. But more and more it is seeping into all kinds of porn; from Parodies (Not Married With Children) to websites.(the aforementioned COLLEGE RULES, DARE DORM and FUCK TEAM FIVE all have had their share of C.F.N.M seepage. Also V.I.P., V.I.P. CREW and REAL SLUT PARTIES)Sometimes you get lucky, but most of the time they show you a bunch of cute girls (and waste a lot of time doing so) that don't even get naked. As you alluded to, on average you might see 2-4 girls actually get naked or participate. (and in the case of Party Hardcore and Drunk Sex Orgy almost NEVER the real cute ones that the cameramen seem to tease us consistently with) In the scheme of things, say, when you compare it to real issues like Global Poverty and possible Nuclear War,it is a niggling thing, but gosh,it is damn annoying
|
12-27-11 04:16am
|
Reply
3
|
All Adult Pass
(2)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from Micha:
AllAdultPass.com
A good selection of ladies, young and mature. A vast archive with past favorites reappearing in ample amounts. Young lovely teens are plentiful and seem to enjoy their work.
But it is largely all for naught.
The network of sites is mostly non navigable. A click on an image, or the use of the back button, can send you to a far corner of the network where you can see obese matures and gangbanged trannies. It will then require five to ten clicks to return to what you were viewing if you can find it at all. The sites move veeerrrrry slowly and downloads are like watching snow melt. The fastest download speed I could attain was 143 Kbps (with a 1.4Mbps modem). Most downloads time out with 80 to 90% complete. The network does not allow resuming downloads so if it is interrupted, it is lost. Download managers are useless and here’s a new one for me. The urls often will change mid-stream, terminating the download.
Files cannot be queued for later download because the url changes within minutes.
Several communications with the support staff have gone un-answered.
Zip files are very difficult to find and when you do find one you find low quality (45 Kb) vid caps. The few photo images are also very low resolution (50 to 80 Kb)
Most of the videos and photosets are years old but are listed as having being added within the last couple of months. Talent that I’ve seen for years, are all now 18 years old again.
In this age of free internet porn, they seem to go out of their way to alienate paying clients
What do I want for 10 bucks?
|
07-19-11 02:35pm
|
Reply
4
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from messmer:
I never understood your discontent because during my most recent subscription with VB they always showed a button that gave the user the choice to go to the original VB. I ended up using that consistently toward the end even though I had tried very hard to find something good in VB3.
|
04-03-11 09:30am
|
Reply
5
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from badandy400:
Another thing about deleting the cookie is you can get different pricing options.
|
04-03-11 08:20am
|
Reply
6
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from messmer:
Well, petefountain, I was one of those who tried to see the good in VB3 bust must confess that some of your irritants became mine as well and during the last part of my subscription I only used the old version. It's still there, except that you might have to sign in again.
|
03-30-11 10:45am
|
Reply
7
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from uscue:
I still use the old version ... haven't gone over to VB3
|
03-30-11 09:57am
|
Reply
8
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from nostromo:
The new interface is a pain in the ass. I can't make out from just glancing at a cover of a DVD if i'm interested in it or not; i used to be able to with the old interface. I refrain myself from commenting on other fun features of the new interface.
|
02-01-11 08:59am
|
Reply
9
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from Goldfish:
Sticking up for software engineers everywhere, it's usually the marketing team that has that annoying desire to change something that works -- we just do what we're paid for. LOL.
|
01-22-11 08:51pm
|
Reply
10
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from PinkPanther:
With the new interface, VB has made the same error that Naughty America made. Naughty America put all that energy into yapping about the members being Naughty Americans and electing a President of Naughty America - paying him a bunch of money, putting him up in a nice condo, etc - going on about the Naughty America community, blah, blah blah - and who could give a flying fuck?
VB's former interface was service-able - could have stood some improvements that were meaningful to members that just cared about the product. Instead, they went for some "community" idea, where the whole thing is members having profiles they spend a bunch of time on and which members are going to be their friends, blah blah blah - and who could give a flying fuck?
Meanwhile - the presentation of the material that we're paying for sucks! Click on any DVD cover and it looks like shit. The previews look like shit. Click on your channels and the information is wrong. So it's just garbage.
|
01-22-11 07:43am
|
Reply
11
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from pat362:
Thanks for the review. That interface sucks real bad. I'm sure I would have thought that I'd clicked on the wrong link if I hadn't read your review. I'm all for improving a site when there are some serious problems but I don't consider this upgarde a improvement.
|
01-22-11 07:15am
|
Reply
12
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for pointing out the change, petefountain. I just took a test drive and the interface is certainly not ideal for anyone using a wide screen monitor at 1680 x 1050 px. Too many scenes and DVD covers crowded onto one line which makes it very hard on the eyes. I think the whole thing could be salvaged if they reduced the maximum of DVDs/Scenes listed to 6 - 8 per row rather than the 12 they list now. It's simply too hard for the average eye to make out all the details.
|
01-21-11 11:59am
|
Reply
13
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from lk2fireone:
A short review, but the points are made very clearly. You gave a simple but effective explanation for your lowered score for the site. Your review is definitely worth reading, not just for your opinion of the site, but also for why software updates can be annoying.
|
01-21-11 06:47am
|
Reply
14
|
Cum In My Wife Please
(1)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from Jimmi:
Im sorry you did not like the site.
we actually have a fair bit of exclusive content as we shot a fair bit of it ourselves.
You also fail to mention you get full access to over 20 other sites we 60 updates a week so there is a fare amount of value in being a member not to mention the streaming video
|
12-09-09 05:31am
|
Reply
15
|
Please Bang My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from Khan:
I see the current listing shows:
"There is a daily download limit (6 videos per 24 hours)."
|
02-15-09 05:34am
|
Reply
16
|
Amateur Creampies
(1)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Review
from uscue:
Good review, thanks. I was wondering if they still updated. Had my eye on these sites for a long time but still haven't joined yet.
|
02-10-09 10:01am
|
Reply
17
|
Please Bang My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
from badandy400:
6 videos per day? Seems a bit harsh!
|
02-09-09 06:07pm
|
