Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : hondaman (7)  

Feedback:   All (26)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (20)

Other:   Replies Received (13)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-13 of 13  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #23 from asmith12: (hondaman's Reply)

Oh, this background of yours indeed explains "attention to details" which sometimes crosses the border of "not seeing forest for the trees". And it's not your fault, but the one of the whole huge legal system which is built to make formalities dominate over common sense and reason. BTW, if I would be in your place (which is not too likely), I would care much more about "not guilty person behind the bars" rather than about "guilty person walking free".

Anyway, I don't see how this background of yours is relevant to the concern I have raised.


04-03-09  01:17am

Reply
2
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (hondaman's Reply)

I looked at the traffic rating site you mentioned.
There has been a large drop-off over the last 6 months in viewers for the pornsites I checked:
Met-art
Metmodels
Hegre-Art
Domai
glamdeluxe
justteensite

For most of the sites I checked, the traffic dropped around 50%, which is a huge percentage. These porn sites must really be hurting.

This is related to the poll that surferman started, asking, "Do you think the current financial recession will make porn providers change the quality or price of their sites in any way?"

This is real proof that the porn sites have lost a huge amount of business over the last 6 months.

Over a 1 year+ period, the traffic dropoff has been even worse, in some sites as much as 66%.

Met-art has around 5 times the traffic of Hegre-art, so I guess subscribers do recognize the better value of Met-art over Hegre-art.


12-01-08  11:49am

Reply
3
Visit Boob Study

Boob Study
(0)
Reply of hondaman's Comment from badandy400:

I was there a few months back. They were updating daily and even showing a schedule of upcoming updates.

I thought it was all around a good site that could get a good name for itself if it keeps doing what it is doing.


11-25-08  10:37pm

Reply
4
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #21 from exotics4me: (hondaman's Reply)

One thing to remember hondaman, the reviewers that "ding" Met-Art for no hardcore, are saving people money that are only interested in hardcore. You mention that it isn't relevant, but it is to someone who has never been on the site that would be reading reviews. Interesting discussion here in the other posts. If I could humbly offer you some advice hondaman, don't mention other sites in a review and say they aren't as good. It will make some of the members question if you are trying to promote the site you are reviewing over the competition.

Otherwise, very good and thorough review for the first time.


11-15-08  08:18pm

Reply
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #19 from asmith12: (hondaman's Reply)

I don't "target" anybody (come on, do you really expect me to care that much about your image here?), I'm just expressing my concern. About those people "below you" - could you elaborate a bit? ANYBODY who will post his/her FIRST review with 98 or so rating is suspicious to me until proven otherwise, period. In formal terms - such rating in the FIRST review by definition carries significant negative credibility attached to it.

11-15-08  02:54pm

Reply
6
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #16 from asmith12: (hondaman's Reply)

> you cant really tell if any person on this site is honest or not
I think I can tell at least most of the time, otherwise what's the point of reading the site?

> I have the right to put out my opnion about a site
Right

> just cause you dont agree with my score dosent mean that I am lying
Right, but I'm suspicious about you _not_ because of disagreeing with you (come on, I disagree with every second person here, starting from exotics4me, but there are no regulars I can suspect), but because your pattern of reviews is quite close to a typical "shill" who tries to promote the site (or sites) for money.


11-15-08  10:06am

Reply
7
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of hondaman's Review from Cybertoad:

Good first review
Like the detail keep em coming


11-14-08  11:24pm

Reply
8
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from asmith12: (hondaman's Reply)

> Not sure what you mean by "lack of fire".
I've meant that at least most of Met-Art models are plastic dollies without any personality. Please read my review and also comments of the other PU'ers to my review.

> Are you sure that you where ever a member of this site?
Yes, I am. Also I'm sure of lots of the other things, though not 100% sure about search on Met-Arts. If it is there, good for them, but my rating stays (I even think of reducing it because of "lack of fire", which IMHO is not compensated by brilliant photo work and locations); just wondering: are ALL Russian models have so little personality?


11-14-08  11:40am

Reply
9
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of hondaman's Review from Denner:

Fine review - and also from this user: welcome to a new - what seems to be a serious PU.
A bit high score, but ok - if the score only goes for photosets, it's ok - because the videos are - alas - still too boring....Would it not be great if this particular site could do better in the way of sexier (solo) videos?

I gave it almost the same score long time ago, I know - but if I should make a new review it'll go a bit lower (90-92) - the downgrade is only because of the videos.


11-14-08  10:25am

Reply
10
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from PinkPanther: (hondaman's Reply)

Saying that Met Art's vids are boring is not saying that they are not hard-core. They are boring soft-core vids. I'm not saying that you could not have interesting soft-core vids. Hegre does them. I like Hegre's vids probably more than I do his pics. His vids are unique, they've got character, they've got personality, they've got humor, as well as looking and sounding great - they're interesting!

Met Art's vids are booooooooooooooooooooooring! Most are painfully boring. I've never seen one of their vids that I wanted to watch a second time, and it's not because they're soft-core and I was thinking "man, if only she were getting fucked!" It's because they were hideously, painfully boring and I was thinking "man, this vid absolutely sucks!"

If I were only into hard-core, I wouldn't be as complimentary about this site as I am. I really like the pics, really dis-like the vids.


11-14-08  06:45am

Reply
11
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of hondaman's Review from PinkPanther:

Nice review of a great pic site - I still can't recommend this site to anybody that is more into vids than pics. The vids on this site are just miserably boring. They're HQ, very pretty, and very, very boring.

11-13-08  10:14pm

Reply
12
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (hondaman's Reply)

If I recall correctly Playboy started with full frontal nudity in the late 1960's followed quickly by Penthouse and Hustler. Perhaps the labia displays began in the early 1970, not the late 60's, but my point is that Met Art's stuff is really of that era except that the Met Art models are quite a bit younger than those appearing in the mags of the 70's.

11-13-08  09:44pm

Reply
13
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of hondaman's Review from Wittyguy:

Hey Hondaman. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. Good first review. Hope to see more soon.

11-13-08  03:59pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-13 of 13  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.26 seconds.