Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : littlejoe (23)  

Feedback:   All (276)  |   Reviews (26)  |   Comments (26)  |   Replies (224)

Other:   Replies Received (126)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 126 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from slutty:

18only is not an exact duplicate although there is a fair amount of overlap, for a while it seemed as though they'd put the video on one site and the photoset on the other, although I don't know if that is still the case. As far as the size of the site, it is pretty large, so 326 pages may be accurate.

10-09-12  04:06pm

Reply
27
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from manholelover:

Have you tried cam4.com? Great selection of models, and is free - unless you decide to tip. most of the models will perform for the whole room without going private. I'm getting quite addicted. I'd appreciate your views...

10-03-12  11:32am

Reply
28
Visit Josh Girls

Josh Girls
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from Capn:

jj1.com may be more to your liking.

I haven't been there for a long time, so it may not be still going.

Cap'n. :0)


10-03-12  09:48am

Reply
29
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from marcdc1:

Thanks for the review littlejoe,

I'm glad to hear this site isn't as sketchie as I thought. The only place I've come in contact with them is through pop-up windows (doesn't exactly instill confidence).

I'm not often a cam show guy, but when I am I'll have to keep them in mind. Thanks again.


10-02-12  03:28pm

Reply
30
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from Cybertoad:

Can you say what kinda of quality and volume on the site ?

Thanks

CT


10-01-12  10:23pm

Reply
31
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(5)
REPLY TO #7 from elephant: (littlejoe's Reply)

Thanks for the info Littlejoe, didn't know you could do something like that, yeah some scenes have got too long, I thing 20-30mins is long enough for scene.

09-30-12  07:54am

Reply
32
Visit Streamate.com

Streamate.com
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from atrapat:

Both PinkPanther and pat362 are right. Streamate.com's "private" is referred at other cam sites as "group" since any number of user may join and chat with the model. It's easy to tell when a model is in exclusive because you don't get the option to join her current "private".

Things get complicated when you throw in the flat rate "gold shows" in the mix. If you have the time and courage, you may try reading my "Taxonomy of a Host's Online Status" comment further down at the Streamate.com comments section here on PU.

As to what models prefer, I've seen all kinds of situations at Streamate.com: models who don't even know that the exclusive option exists and also models who set the exact same price for private and exclusive to encourage 1 on 1. When I asked a model who set the private 1 cent cheaper than the exclusive, she said she did so because she couldn't cope with the multiple requests at the same time that come from a non-exclusive chat and preferred giving attention to just one member.


05-02-12  11:57am

Reply
33
Visit Streamate.com

Streamate.com
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from pat362:

I think pinkpanthers explanation makes sense and I just want to add that there must be a huge increase in the cost associated with the type of show. Private cams shows are, in my opinion, unbelievably expensive to begin with so I can imagine that getting an exclusif one would be nothing less than astonomical.

I've seen mentions of private shows for porn performers in the range of 12$ to 14$ a minute. That's private so exclsuif would have to be at least twice as expensive for them to even consider doing it.


05-02-12  10:04am

Reply
34
Visit Streamate.com

Streamate.com
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from PinkPanther:

I'm guessing, but it's not a complete ass-in-the-wind guess. I believe that with the normal private show, other users can also gain access. If you click on a message that a model is in a private show, you get a message, "This model is in a private show, if you want to join, the cost is $3.99/minute" or whatever.

Given that reality, I would imagine that the model can work out a deal with a guy to block all other users so that she is truly exclusive to that 1 user. Is that important to you that you be the only person giving the private show? If so, then exclusive is better. If it's enough that the model is giving you a show where she is responding to your desires, then the exclusive option is really only better for her (she gets to charge more).


05-02-12  06:53am

Reply
35
N/A REPLY TO #14 from RagingBuddhist: (littlejoe's Reply)

littlejoe hit the nail on the head. Comcast became a real pain in the ass when it started with a 250 gig per month limit. I've found myself having to plan joining sites based on how much I've downloaded vs how much I think I'll be downloading. If I'm going after material that I know will take up a lot of drive space, I'll usually join towards the end of the month so the membership will span two months' allotment. But, in the end, I'll get whatever file I want.

I think back to the first file I grabbed that was over a gig and thought, "Wow! This is insane!". But that was when a 120 gig drive was considered big. Now I have files that are 3.5 gigs and more and don't think too much of it.


01-11-12  06:17pm

Reply
36
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from dracken:

Good review.

Caught the good and the bad about Videobox.

I am curious what kind of download speeds did you get? My membership goes up and down depending on the time of month or something :) Just curious to compare.


11-07-11  05:32pm

Reply
37
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from gaypornolover:

I've joined VideoBox Men and agree it has lots of content but not necessarily the quality. Must post my review of that soon. Good review!

11-06-11  12:31pm

Reply
38
Visit AT Kingdom

AT Kingdom
(0)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from PinkPanther:

2000 X 3000 is what you get when you choose the "High" option, as I always do. I believe that there was a comment placed on this site at the point that ATK increased to that level. It was a while ago - there's a wealth of material at that size.

11-06-11  12:11pm

Reply
39
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from messmer:

If you refer to a buggy web page is that because if freezes on you? I know this happens quite frequently with me, everything goes swimmingly and then, no matter which link I click on, there will be no response from VB for a while. As to your speed, that might be a problem on your end (provider, routing etc.) I regularly download at a speed of 1.7 MB/s, not my top speed but good enough.

11-06-11  09:59am

Reply
40
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from Monahan:

Been a member for 4 years straight and love the site. When I joined we got 1 new video per day. Now it's 5 with an occasional bonus. The five used to be loaded every 4+ hours during the day. Now they drop all 5 at the same time, an improvement.

I agree with LJ's review except I would boost the score by 5 or 6 points because for sheer content there's no other site with nearly as much stuff. I can't go much higher than 86, though because their identification of the talent still really sucks. If you want to check out a specific model, you'll be really frustrated because to find all of a girl's stuff on the site you need to try a search on several different spellings and even that doesn't always do it especially when they do not identify the girls in the first place.

Good part - Huge inventory.
Bad Part - Lousy needle in a haystack search feature.


11-06-11  09:24am

Reply
41
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from Cybertoad:

I think most sites that offer a low entry cost do so the last month of the commitment.

10-27-11  03:03pm

Reply
42
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from RustyJ:

It's a clever system if you ask me. It makes you stay ;)

10-22-11  02:48am

Reply
43
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from anyonebutme:

You can cancel at any time without paying for any additional months. It's just saying that if you keep that subscription active for more than 4 months, the price for every additional month drops.

10-21-11  08:19pm

Reply
44
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from pat362:

You join for 20$ and unless you cancel then you will be rebilled 20$ for the first 4 months. The price drops to 10$ on the fifth month and remains at that price for as long as you remain a member.

10-21-11  06:40pm

Reply
45
N/A REPLY TO #15 from turboshaft: (littlejoe's Reply)

Perish the thought! Aurora Snow will never change!

That being said, I would still love to have a baby with her any day... ; - )


10-10-11  06:52am

Reply
46
N/A REPLY TO #10 from BadMrFrosty: (littlejoe's Reply)

In a time when 11 year olds are barefoot and pregnant I would not be suprised if half the cast of "18 Dreams 73" were quite literally MILFs.

10-09-11  01:12pm

Reply
47
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from Goldfish:

Nice review littlejoe. I've gone back and forth on joining this site. The girls do look hot but the price is a little steep.

12-16-10  08:46pm

Reply
48
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Review from inthecrack:

A few corrections:

Yes there are zipped picture sets.

There are very few fake boobs on the site. Maybe 5%. The ones that do have fake boobs were hired because they make up for it in other ways.

Large file sizes are the trade off for higher resolution videos. Unfortunately you cannot simultaneously have both high res and low file sizes.

ITC


12-13-10  07:50pm

Reply
49
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from FTV Staff:

With the original hope back in 2008 to aim for 40,000 members or more on FTV, the servers were upgraded to support this. Right now the servers are only at about 33% of capacity, because of the upgrades. Never a slowdown, and whether good or bad, FTV spends more on bandwidth/server costs than any softcore site on the net.

180,000 GB burned in a month.... :(


01-03-10  02:53pm

Reply
50
Visit Lesbian Army

Lesbian Army
(0)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment from mbaya:

I also find this interesting. You mentioned a network, but PU has no mention. The site layout looks a lot like nudesportvideos.com. Is this by the same people?

11-17-09  07:13pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 126 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.93 seconds.