| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from dracken:
Good review.
Caught the good and the bad about Videobox.
I am curious what kind of download speeds did you get? My membership goes up and down depending on the time of month or something :) Just curious to compare.
|
11-07-11 05:32pm
|
Reply
27
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from gaypornolover:
I've joined VideoBox Men and agree it has lots of content but not necessarily the quality. Must post my review of that soon. Good review!
|
11-06-11 12:31pm
|
Reply
28
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from PinkPanther:
2000 X 3000 is what you get when you choose the "High" option, as I always do. I believe that there was a comment placed on this site at the point that ATK increased to that level. It was a while ago - there's a wealth of material at that size.
|
11-06-11 12:11pm
|
Reply
29
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from messmer:
If you refer to a buggy web page is that because if freezes on you? I know this happens quite frequently with me, everything goes swimmingly and then, no matter which link I click on, there will be no response from VB for a while. As to your speed, that might be a problem on your end (provider, routing etc.) I regularly download at a speed of 1.7 MB/s, not my top speed but good enough.
|
11-06-11 09:59am
|
Reply
30
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Monahan:
Been a member for 4 years straight and love the site. When I joined we got 1 new video per day. Now it's 5 with an occasional bonus. The five used to be loaded every 4+ hours during the day. Now they drop all 5 at the same time, an improvement.
I agree with LJ's review except I would boost the score by 5 or 6 points because for sheer content there's no other site with nearly as much stuff. I can't go much higher than 86, though because their identification of the talent still really sucks. If you want to check out a specific model, you'll be really frustrated because to find all of a girl's stuff on the site you need to try a search on several different spellings and even that doesn't always do it especially when they do not identify the girls in the first place.
Good part - Huge inventory.
Bad Part - Lousy needle in a haystack search feature.
|
11-06-11 09:24am
|
Reply
31
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Cybertoad:
I think most sites that offer a low entry cost do so the last month of the commitment.
|
10-27-11 03:03pm
|
Reply
32
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from RustyJ:
It's a clever system if you ask me. It makes you stay ;)
|
10-22-11 02:48am
|
Reply
33
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from anyonebutme:
You can cancel at any time without paying for any additional months. It's just saying that if you keep that subscription active for more than 4 months, the price for every additional month drops.
|
10-21-11 08:19pm
|
Reply
34
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from pat362:
You join for 20$ and unless you cancel then you will be rebilled 20$ for the first 4 months. The price drops to 10$ on the fifth month and remains at that price for as long as you remain a member.
|
10-21-11 06:40pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Perish the thought! Aurora Snow will never change!
That being said, I would still love to have a baby with her any day... ; - )
|
10-10-11 06:52am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from BadMrFrosty:
(littlejoe's Reply)
In a time when 11 year olds are barefoot and pregnant I would not be suprised if half the cast of "18 Dreams 73" were quite literally MILFs.
|
10-09-11 01:12pm
|
Reply
37
|
In The Crack
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Goldfish:
Nice review littlejoe. I've gone back and forth on joining this site. The girls do look hot but the price is a little steep.
|
12-16-10 08:46pm
|
Reply
38
|
In The Crack
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from inthecrack:
A few corrections:
Yes there are zipped picture sets.
There are very few fake boobs on the site. Maybe 5%. The ones that do have fake boobs were hired because they make up for it in other ways.
Large file sizes are the trade off for higher resolution videos. Unfortunately you cannot simultaneously have both high res and low file sizes.
ITC
|
12-13-10 07:50pm
|
Reply
39
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from FTV Staff:
With the original hope back in 2008 to aim for 40,000 members or more on FTV, the servers were upgraded to support this. Right now the servers are only at about 33% of capacity, because of the upgrades. Never a slowdown, and whether good or bad, FTV spends more on bandwidth/server costs than any softcore site on the net.
180,000 GB burned in a month.... :(
|
01-03-10 02:53pm
|
Reply
40
|
Lesbian Army
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from mbaya:
I also find this interesting. You mentioned a network, but PU has no mention. The site layout looks a lot like nudesportvideos.com. Is this by the same people?
|
11-17-09 07:13pm
|
Reply
41
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from GCode:
Took me about 15 seconds and I never been a member but I think this is what you are looking for? Here you go.
http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=home
|
07-22-09 11:58am
|
Reply
42
|
Anilos
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from messmer:
I personally found the young women of "Nubiles" charming and most of the women of "Anilos" very beautiful. It would, as always depend on your taste. Both sites are owned by the same company and are set up the same. My suggestion is to go to Anilos and look at their model list, that will give you an excellent idea of what the site is all about.
|
07-16-09 03:32pm
|
Reply
43
|
Met Art
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(littlejoe's Reply)
The clean shaven aspect doesn't bother me that much but the absence of any heavier eroticism, such as finger insertions and/or labia play reduces the appeal of this site.
That said, perhaps it's me but it seems like the models are getting more busty, are doing a lot more leg spreading than before and are, on average, prettier than in past years.
And I wish they would do something to make their videos watchable. They are usually videos of photo shoot sessions which are not nearly as interesting as the stills.
|
07-08-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
44
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment from littlejoe:
well it turns out that its flashget thats slowing the downloads down. im guessing ftv disabled download managers. with standard firefox i get 1mb/s but with flashget i get 250kb/s. however flashget doesnt slow anything else down, it usualy doubles the speed
anyways, downloading files 1 by 1 is really annoying so i havent visited for a week and ive unsubscribed. oh well...
|
07-08-09 03:28pm
|
Reply
45
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
hhmm, I haven't been a member for a couple months now but I don' remember blazing fast downloads on the site so 250 kb/s could be right. I'm just more disappointed in the terrible lack of and quality of extreme updates this year with FTV
|
06-30-09 01:46am
|
Reply
46
|
In The Crack
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from mbaya:
(littlejoe's Reply)
I can't remember if flashget was a problem. When you sign up and check it out please post so others will know. I hope you like the site.
|
06-29-09 07:36am
|
Reply
47
|
Change Room Hunters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Xororos:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Hmm . . . The videos on Voyeur Russian look a lot like the videos on ChangeRoom. Maybe Russia does not regulate this sort of thing as closely. However, I'm wondering what your basis is for determining that they're real, as opposed to staged? Either way, the site looks interesting - thanks for the tip.
|
04-06-09 09:52pm
|
Reply
48
|
Maniac Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(littlejoe's Reply)
They removed it awhile back. I went to join the trial not long after that review to get the rest of the Skillful Hands content, but it was gone and even worse, they've changed the Skillful Hands site. It used to be exclusive content, now they just add scenes from DVDs that are available at any DVD site.
|
02-26-09 10:59am
|
Reply
49
|
Tushy School
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Great news! Really appreciate your reply! Thanks.
|
01-27-09 08:32am
|
Reply
50
|
Tushy School
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from Jay G:
Joe, I take it your opinion of the site has improved from "Don't bother with it"?
I'd like more information if it's now worthwhile. I've been tempted before, but your warning kept me from it.
|
01-26-09 03:45pm
|
