| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Mr. Skin
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from slutty:
Nice review, good to hear they are allowing downloading again, I heard somewhere that it was streaming only.
|
05-12-13 10:17pm
|
Reply
2
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from davidax:
(littlejoe's Reply)
hi, i did not say that there was a unautorized withdrawl of my creditcard, thats all fine, but sessions did not finish after i logged out!!! So all my money was gone when i came back.
|
05-09-13 05:20am
|
Reply
3
|
Mr. Skin
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Thanks.
|
04-09-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
4
|
Mr. Skin
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Thanks. Are there multiple options or is it only the flash version?
|
04-07-13 08:59am
|
Reply
5
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(littlejoe's Reply)
I've been discovering new irksome quirks in the "update."
Now, if you switch photo size on say, page 12, you are taken back to page 1. (This was not a problem before.)
If you try to download a single photo, the file name is this lengthy gobbledeegook nonsense with no file number. (So how are you supposed to find out the file number if you want it? Not a problem before. And just stop expecting the system to work for humans.)
Try downloading a zip, and the file name stretches out like an interstate highway. I just downloaded one, and the file name was EIGHTY-TWO characters long.
I have a term for this that goes way back to the days of Netscape version releases: It's a "fuck-up-date."
|
03-04-13 05:33pm
|
Reply
6
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(littlejoe's Reply)
My experience is discussed in a comment I made last August.
All problems were resolved but not easily. There is no support function available to members. Fortunately the webmaster reads posts on the PU site and posted a reply with his email address. He was on it immediately.
I decided not to renew mainly because of limited time, but once I was able to access the site (and the two sister sites) I was impressed with both the quality of the material and the natural beauty of the models.
I hope that the webmaster has since added a support capability to address issues that arise.
|
02-28-13 11:59pm
|
Reply
7
|
Nude Sport Videos
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review from littlejoe:
just chiming in to say the newest vids are still 720p but look great. one of my favorite sites
|
12-19-12 02:45pm
|
Reply
8
|
Japanese Flashers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from mbaya:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Sorry, but I just don't remember.
|
11-18-12 03:42pm
|
Reply
9
|
Lesbian Ass Worship
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Cybertoad:
Fake licking ? Thats like trying to eat a big mac without biting it. LOL
|
10-30-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
10
|
21 Sextreme
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cybertoad:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Cool thanks LJ.
|
10-19-12 02:23pm
|
Reply
11
|
DOMAI
(3)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Capn:
Whilst I do like the models, the lack of progression through the sets is a frustration.
Bang, they are naked....all through the set.
I would much rather have a nicely paced strip to give an erotic slow reveal.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-15-12 09:42am
|
Reply
12
|
Mr. Skin
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from slutty:
That's too bad they got rid of downloads, I hadn't even realized. In my opinion it is rarely worth the time to use video capture stuff, you are probably just better off joining CMA or something, although they can get a bit expensive if you tend to do a lot of downloading.
Thanks for pointing this out though, I probably would have made the mistake of joining this site again without realizing they had removed the downloadable videos.
|
10-12-12 09:53pm
|
Reply
13
|
Lez Cuties
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from elephant:
I don't know littlejoe, I love the site too, love the makeup they use on the girls, not over done and looks perfect. I though really would change about the site, no toys, always hated them, find my lesbian porn much hotter without the plastic and just tongues and fingers but know loads of people like the dildos so I'm probably in the minority.
|
10-10-12 02:53am
|
Reply
14
|
Young Legal Porn
(7)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from tangub:
I do think the tours are misleading on these sites in that they don't make it clear that what you see in the tour is the network updates and requires a $99 minimum spend to see it all. The figures they quote for the number of models, images, scenes etc are for the entire network and not a single site subscription.
|
10-09-12 11:19pm
|
Reply
15
|
Young Legal Porn
(7)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from slutty:
18only is not an exact duplicate although there is a fair amount of overlap, for a while it seemed as though they'd put the video on one site and the photoset on the other, although I don't know if that is still the case. As far as the size of the site, it is pretty large, so 326 pages may be accurate.
|
10-09-12 04:06pm
|
Reply
16
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from manholelover:
Have you tried cam4.com? Great selection of models, and is free - unless you decide to tip. most of the models will perform for the whole room without going private. I'm getting quite addicted. I'd appreciate your views...
|
10-03-12 11:32am
|
Reply
17
|
Josh Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Capn:
jj1.com may be more to your liking.
I haven't been there for a long time, so it may not be still going.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-03-12 09:48am
|
Reply
18
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from marcdc1:
Thanks for the review littlejoe,
I'm glad to hear this site isn't as sketchie as I thought. The only place I've come in contact with them is through pop-up windows (doesn't exactly instill confidence).
I'm not often a cam show guy, but when I am I'll have to keep them in mind. Thanks again.
|
10-02-12 03:28pm
|
Reply
19
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from Cybertoad:
Can you say what kinda of quality and volume on the site ?
Thanks
CT
|
10-01-12 10:23pm
|
Reply
20
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from elephant:
(littlejoe's Reply)
Thanks for the info Littlejoe, didn't know you could do something like that, yeah some scenes have got too long, I thing 20-30mins is long enough for scene.
|
09-30-12 07:54am
|
Reply
21
|
Streamate.com
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from atrapat:
Both PinkPanther and pat362 are right. Streamate.com's "private" is referred at other cam sites as "group" since any number of user may join and chat with the model. It's easy to tell when a model is in exclusive because you don't get the option to join her current "private".
Things get complicated when you throw in the flat rate "gold shows" in the mix. If you have the time and courage, you may try reading my "Taxonomy of a Host's Online Status" comment further down at the Streamate.com comments section here on PU.
As to what models prefer, I've seen all kinds of situations at Streamate.com: models who don't even know that the exclusive option exists and also models who set the exact same price for private and exclusive to encourage 1 on 1. When I asked a model who set the private 1 cent cheaper than the exclusive, she said she did so because she couldn't cope with the multiple requests at the same time that come from a non-exclusive chat and preferred giving attention to just one member.
|
05-02-12 11:57am
|
Reply
22
|
Streamate.com
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from pat362:
I think pinkpanthers explanation makes sense and I just want to add that there must be a huge increase in the cost associated with the type of show. Private cams shows are, in my opinion, unbelievably expensive to begin with so I can imagine that getting an exclusif one would be nothing less than astonomical.
I've seen mentions of private shows for porn performers in the range of 12$ to 14$ a minute. That's private so exclsuif would have to be at least twice as expensive for them to even consider doing it.
|
05-02-12 10:04am
|
Reply
23
|
Streamate.com
(1)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I'm guessing, but it's not a complete ass-in-the-wind guess. I believe that with the normal private show, other users can also gain access. If you click on a message that a model is in a private show, you get a message, "This model is in a private show, if you want to join, the cost is $3.99/minute" or whatever.
Given that reality, I would imagine that the model can work out a deal with a guy to block all other users so that she is truly exclusive to that 1 user. Is that important to you that you be the only person giving the private show? If so, then exclusive is better. If it's enough that the model is giving you a show where she is responding to your desires, then the exclusive option is really only better for her (she gets to charge more).
|
05-02-12 06:53am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from RagingBuddhist:
(littlejoe's Reply)
littlejoe hit the nail on the head. Comcast became a real pain in the ass when it started with a 250 gig per month limit. I've found myself having to plan joining sites based on how much I've downloaded vs how much I think I'll be downloading. If I'm going after material that I know will take up a lot of drive space, I'll usually join towards the end of the month so the membership will span two months' allotment. But, in the end, I'll get whatever file I want.
I think back to the first file I grabbed that was over a gig and thought, "Wow! This is insane!". But that was when a 120 gig drive was considered big. Now I have files that are 3.5 gigs and more and don't think too much of it.
|
01-11-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
25
|
VideoBox
(11)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
from dracken:
Good review.
Caught the good and the bad about Videobox.
I am curious what kind of download speeds did you get? My membership goes up and down depending on the time of month or something :) Just curious to compare.
|
11-07-11 05:32pm
|
