Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (896)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (775)

Other:   Replies Received (505)  |   Trust Ratings (61)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 505 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
REPLY TO #6 from Mort: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Great review, and agree with just about everything you have said.
As a further update, about a month after the RagingBuddhist's last comment, there are still a fair few "updates" that are not really updates, and I have just discovered that they have some sort of software running to limit downloads and image viewing. I logged a job about it, and got a reply that says the limit on viewing images is 500 per hour. However, if I worked flat out on my relatively slow connection, there is no way I could hit 500 full size images in an hour. It also complains you are trying to open too many images at once if you pop up images in a tab, even when only one image at a time is downloading. So, beware of the undeclared limits, and the dodgy limit-checking software they are running.


05-19-13  12:57am

Reply
52
Visit Nude In SF

Nude In SF
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

According to your comment it was almost exactly four years ago, and I think you are 100% accurate in your assessment: nothing has changed since then. (Except that it is technically twice the price now because they shortened the membership from two weeks to one, but that really isn't a big deal because there is very little here and a determined member with a normal internet connection could download everything they wanted in a couple of hours.)

I really, really, really wish that there were more sites with good public nudity in American (or Canadian or Western European cities) but I realize that the current legal climate probably prevents this. Not to sound like a shill, but if you do like public nudity, the best I've seen is Teasers VOD.


04-30-13  05:54pm

Reply
53
Visit Candy Christopher

Candy Christopher
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from marcdc1: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.

But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.

Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)


04-20-13  09:59am

Reply
54
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(3)
REPLY TO #1 from audrina69: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks Raging. Interestingly, when I had a technical issue, I contacted the webmaster thru www.thebestporn.com and got a prompt response. So I hope that someone will read this and take action. As I seriously doubt I am the only one who is aware and disturbed by these issues.

04-20-13  08:33am

Reply
55
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Ace DDF:

Hello Pornusers,

Ace from DDF Here. Thanks for the feedback, it is very much appreciated. We understand your frustrations with some recycled content. It is definitely something that we do not intentionally do. Unfortunately in this business, Actors and Actresses call in sick from time to time and sometimes just cancel and dont show up for shoots. On a good day were able to scramble and have an agency send a replacement, but it doesnt always happen. So unfortunately we need to recycle because of this at times.

Sites like Hairy Twatter are quite small, and content is increasing, but the biggest Value of these smaller sites is within the Network and not as stand alone. Were in the process of a full Network redesign, and all the sites within, plus an adjustment in pricing. Were hoping to launch that in 2 to 3 months, but in the meantime we are making some small updates, and refreshing those old Banners and images will be part of that. We hope you will keep coming back to check out all the new stuff were working on, and continue to give us feedback on how we can improve.

Best--Ace


04-08-13  02:04am

Reply
56
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from pat362:

This is one of my biggest pet peeves with the DDF Network. They decide many years ago that it was okay to use the content from one site to update another one. This is obvioulsy the case with this site. What they have done is taken content from some of their other sites where the performers had pubic hair and use it to update this site. The best example is on the main page where you see a video of Daria Glower. That thing has to be a few years old because she has been in the industry for a decade now and does not look like that anymore.

04-07-13  09:26am

Reply
57
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

No, that's close to the procedure I would use too. I'm just a bit tired having done so much work to identify what I've unloaded already.


Thanks for all the input and good words!


04-07-13  08:32am

Reply
58
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks, RB-

I do use a bulk renaming app (A Better Finder Rename) all the time. But with all the other research and renaming that has to be done to WAP's files and folders after downloads, renaming the image files themselves is just one more nail in the coffin. The vido files are so inconsistently named that bulk renaming doesn't really work: it has to be done manually.

THE FILES AND FOLDERS SHOULD BE NAMED PROPERLY FROM THE SITE.

As to VLC: I stopped using it a few years ago. If I remember correctly, it was because it kept losing prefs across updates. Again, if I remember, I had to enter custom prefs to get arrow-keys to serve for video FF/REW/SKIP functions; it was a lot of work and after VLC trashed that work I stopped bothering to use it. Again: this was years ago and I may not be remembering correctly.

The wmv files have 1440 horiz. resolution: better than HD video, and enough for me. They also save a bit of drive space, which accumulates.


04-07-13  05:55am

Reply
59
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from tangub:

Maggie's review was written in October 2011 though. I'm not a member now but was about 3 to 4 months ago and at that time they had 77 scenes and were updating that site once a week with a new scene. The site tour now shows 93 scenes which is consistent with 1 new scene being added per week since my membership ended. I'm pretty sure you can trust what they show in the tour on DDF sites.

04-07-13  12:40am

Reply
60
Visit Cathy's Craving

Cathy's Craving
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I think that in Cathy's case. It's not so much the fucking as the kind she likes to do that is at the core of her situation. That woman simly loves or loved to have mutltiple partners all at the same time and that must take a toll on anyone.

I did see one scene dated in 2012 in the sextion where she has sex with fans so maybe she is still doing some of those. She hasn't really changed in looks since mid 2000 so it's next to impossible to be sure if the dates on the content are accurate.


04-06-13  12:16pm

Reply
61
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:

I'm dropping the score. The updates in the last six days were:
4 biographies - two of them back-to-back
5 photo sets - one of which is a low resolution Girls Out West set
One short non-nude interview
And one full-length video.

If the photo sets were of better quality, this might not be so bad, but they're just not that great. Believe it or not, I'd still recommend the site for a first time join, but after that, it's just not all that.


04-06-13  04:19am

Reply
62
Visit LeLu Love

LeLu Love
(0)
REPLY TO #14 from marcdc1: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

What's wrong with Zombaio? I've never had a problem with them, but I think this is the only site I've ever used them with.

04-05-13  01:38pm

Reply
63
Visit LeLu Love

LeLu Love
(0)
REPLY TO #12 from LeluLove Co: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks for the quick and awesome review and answer Marc as always!! :)

And @Raging, you can join through CCBill right here:

http://www.lelulove.com/external/Lelu-Lo...-Presentation-3.html

Hope that helps!! :)

Love,
Lelu XOXO


04-01-13  04:07pm

Reply
64
Visit LeLu Love

LeLu Love
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from marcdc1: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

How's this for an easy answer - on the newer videos there is no watermark.

I looked back over 800 videos and only found watermarks on her blog content - not the member videos. That took me to March 2011. When I look at the oldest content I can see a watermark but I found it unobtrusive, it's a light pink (almost white) watermark in the corner. (That video was dated Feb 14 2011)

I hope that fully answers the question. I have to confess I really like Lelu and highly recommend her site. I think any solo content girl that updates everyday and gives her fans personal attention is deserving of all the success in the world.

If you decide to join please do a review, I ranked it at 100 which I know is awfully high, but like I said in my review; when you accomplish what you set out to do, and fulfill your marketing, what else could we customers want?


04-01-13  01:25pm

Reply
65
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Cybertoad:



RB, very nice review as always !


04-01-13  08:19am

Reply
66
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Denner:

Thanks, RB - exeptionel review. Never took a look at that site before - but it seems like a good idea.....

03-31-13  09:58am

Reply
67
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:

A NICE ADDENDUM:
Upon cancelling, I was prompted to explain why I was cancelling and took the opportunity to explain most of the above. Despite my criticisms, the response I got was positive and well-taken, although I will say it doesn't really change how I feel about the site. The horrible economy are what force the ad placement and the inability to update more full-length content. The interviews, I'm told, are just one of those things that people either love or hate. I just happen to be in the hate category. And the tattoos and piercings are just a trend that's growing and getting harder to avoid. I can accept all the responses I got from Billie (webmistress) as very valid and I appreciate the quick response I got from her. But, again, this site is ever so close to what I'm looking for - but it does fall short in my eyes. Maybe time will tell and things here will swing more towards what I'm looking for.


03-29-13  01:17pm

Reply
68
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Marcus:

Was there another swathe of biased reviews I missed? The last batch were extremely annoying.

03-23-13  07:59am

Reply
69
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Marcus:

Really good feature, that. I try and cancel straight away if I know I'm not going to renew, but on some where I do stay for a while, it's always sod's law that by the time I cancel it's a day after the rebill, so this is a great feature.

Just reading through the comments and it's a shame that the webmaster is blindly defensive to the point they pick holes in largely positive reviews. I know if I ever join the site I won't be reviewing it on Porn Users.


03-23-13  05:17am

Reply
70
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from slutty:

It is an interesting offer, perhaps other will follow suit. I accidentally let a few rollover a few years ago, now I almost always cancel right when I join.

03-23-13  01:10am

Reply
71
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from hodayathink: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I feel like it's just the nature of the people that join sites like these and like them. They want to "please their mistress" so much that they are more than eager to do things like this for them.

03-22-13  10:47am

Reply
72
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from hodayathink:

Is it just me, or does this seem to be more common with dominatrix sites than any other type of site?

03-21-13  09:38pm

Reply
73
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from dingle: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Darn missed the edit time lol....


Let me know of any videos up coming in the next few weeks
that seem to look good in the trailers and i will DL and review-


03-21-13  11:35am

Reply
74
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from dingle: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Hi ya, buddhist-- Been a long time...

Im sort of a member but i do not subscribe any longer, instead
there is a option to add credits to your account and then download
any video across any section & then stays on your account-
This works for me- Im too scared to pay a subscription ( $2.49 a video)


There does seem to be more solo models with dildo's or using fingers/masterbating & boy/girl videos than in the past.
But im finding "That girl next door " A little less harder to come by than in the classic abby-.





(Abby admins- Leave the weed & get yourself to the uk and tap the market here ;-)


03-21-13  11:16am

Reply
75
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from bibo: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Obvious faker. Joined today, first review, 100% score for a site that got three 100% scores on ONE day by first time posters.
Hopefully the admins will take care of that, because this is just fraud.


03-21-13  10:47am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 505 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.08 seconds.