Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (63)  

Feedback:   All (872)  |   Reviews (30)  |   Comments (85)  |   Replies (757)

Other:   Replies Received (495)  |   Trust Ratings (64)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 495 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I'll still go with expert opinion, it's urine, women can't shoot ejaculate out of their vaginas like a freak in a circus side show.

07-22-13  11:19pm

Reply
27
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Used to date a squirter, we both got sick of it and made a consult with the gynecologist. She told us that it's quite common, and that the "squirting" is urine, coming straight out of the bladder, and it's an involuntary reflex. She informed us that some women squirt because the penis is poking the bladder, some women squirt when orgasming, and some women can do it at will. I'll take the opinion of an expert any day. Ever watch a chic squirt in a video? Notice how it's squirting right out of her pee hole? Women orgasm through their vagina, not their pee hole.

07-22-13  08:12pm

Reply
28
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

To their credit, it is mentioned clearly in the Terms of Service. But 15 downloads per month??? That's insane. It looks like another attempt to foil pirates that only hurts legitimate paying customers.

07-21-13  08:13am

Reply
29
Visit Met Art Network

Met Art Network
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from lk2fireone:

$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.

{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)

A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.

IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.

JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.

ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.

THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.

BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.

METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.

THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.

LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.

LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.


06-29-13  09:55pm

Reply
30
Visit Met Art Network

Met Art Network
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from pat362:

I agree with you that the cost is a little high but seeing as these are all top notch sites then that shouldn't be an issue for people looking for a good deal. The time needed to surf all these sites is a bigger hurtle and one that might make some hesitate joining.

Another problem and possibly the biggest one is that the although all the sites are top notch. Is there really a lot of variation from one of these erotic photography sites to the others in the network? If there isn't and most of the women appearing on one of the sites also appears on the others than all you are getting is more of the same. The only one that seems to distinguish itself from the others is sexart but that is because it's more midcore to hardcore than the others and may not appeal to fans of the other sites.


06-29-13  09:51am

Reply
31
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from thaavi: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

All the data here: http://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review

06-03-13  03:37am

Reply
32
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from messmer: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

No doubt Abby Winters wanted some free advertising at the time but I was a willing participant and no, I never expected compensation nor did I get any. I was just glad to spread the Gospel of, what I thought was a great site at the time. I do agree, however, that a flood of extremely short, favourable reviews, might make one suspicious!

06-02-13  10:06pm

Reply
33
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from ChaseGC:

In the Viv Thomas forum, subscribers to IDreamOfJo were asked to write a review here, so I did. I've never heard of pornusers.com .

BTW, I've been a member of several of paysites listed by rating, and I would not give DDF Production any more than a 50 - you couldn't give me a membership to such trash- and you guys have them at #5. So much for the over-rating BS.


06-02-13  12:11pm

Reply
34
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(2)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Cybertoad:

On the site issues, I try Chrome and Maxthon both give good feed back to test a site I do find Firefox faster .

06-02-13  07:45am

Reply
35
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.

06-01-13  05:46pm

Reply
36
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from thaavi: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Why you people are so suspicious. Why you just can´t believe the site is that good? No, mistress really didn´t sent us. Admin told us about possibility to write our opinion here, so some of us did. That´s all.

06-01-13  05:00pm

Reply
37
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from pat362:

I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.


06-01-13  10:44am

Reply
38
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Elmien: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Me and Thaavi came in on the same time due to communication... See there is a lot of communication on our "web mistress" site. Personally I didn't even wanted to post a review due to negative comments that will be given but as a member of that site I felt its necessary to inform the people how addictive this "webmistress" site is. Ife your a real follower of Jo/monica you would understand..

And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it... How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many? And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons... Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...


06-01-13  12:08am

Reply
39
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Elmien: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Commercials? Are you kidding me? I'm a member of this site and came across this misleading review... First of all there is no other site coming even close to this site. I have been to other sites and with big disappointment always returning to Idreamofjo.com. This is the only site I came across that shows so much passion and sensuality that its almost to good to be true. And for those wondering about the updates... Well rest assure that the site is being updated every week. As you enter the site there's a clock showing when the next update is due.. And its always been on time.

05-31-13  10:44pm

Reply
40
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from marcdc1: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Buddhist you don't mean what I think you mean do you?

:)


05-31-13  05:49pm

Reply
41
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from Mort: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Great review, and agree with just about everything you have said.
As a further update, about a month after the RagingBuddhist's last comment, there are still a fair few "updates" that are not really updates, and I have just discovered that they have some sort of software running to limit downloads and image viewing. I logged a job about it, and got a reply that says the limit on viewing images is 500 per hour. However, if I worked flat out on my relatively slow connection, there is no way I could hit 500 full size images in an hour. It also complains you are trying to open too many images at once if you pop up images in a tab, even when only one image at a time is downloading. So, beware of the undeclared limits, and the dodgy limit-checking software they are running.


05-19-13  12:57am

Reply
42
Visit Nude In SF

Nude In SF
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

According to your comment it was almost exactly four years ago, and I think you are 100% accurate in your assessment: nothing has changed since then. (Except that it is technically twice the price now because they shortened the membership from two weeks to one, but that really isn't a big deal because there is very little here and a determined member with a normal internet connection could download everything they wanted in a couple of hours.)

I really, really, really wish that there were more sites with good public nudity in American (or Canadian or Western European cities) but I realize that the current legal climate probably prevents this. Not to sound like a shill, but if you do like public nudity, the best I've seen is Teasers VOD.


04-30-13  05:54pm

Reply
43
Visit Candy Christopher

Candy Christopher
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from marcdc1: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.

But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.

Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)


04-20-13  09:59am

Reply
44
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(7)
REPLY TO #1 from audrina69: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks Raging. Interestingly, when I had a technical issue, I contacted the webmaster thru www.thebestporn.com and got a prompt response. So I hope that someone will read this and take action. As I seriously doubt I am the only one who is aware and disturbed by these issues.

04-20-13  08:33am

Reply
45
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Ace DDF:

Hello Pornusers,

Ace from DDF Here. Thanks for the feedback, it is very much appreciated. We understand your frustrations with some recycled content. It is definitely something that we do not intentionally do. Unfortunately in this business, Actors and Actresses call in sick from time to time and sometimes just cancel and dont show up for shoots. On a good day were able to scramble and have an agency send a replacement, but it doesnt always happen. So unfortunately we need to recycle because of this at times.

Sites like Hairy Twatter are quite small, and content is increasing, but the biggest Value of these smaller sites is within the Network and not as stand alone. Were in the process of a full Network redesign, and all the sites within, plus an adjustment in pricing. Were hoping to launch that in 2 to 3 months, but in the meantime we are making some small updates, and refreshing those old Banners and images will be part of that. We hope you will keep coming back to check out all the new stuff were working on, and continue to give us feedback on how we can improve.

Best--Ace


04-08-13  02:04am

Reply
46
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from pat362:

This is one of my biggest pet peeves with the DDF Network. They decide many years ago that it was okay to use the content from one site to update another one. This is obvioulsy the case with this site. What they have done is taken content from some of their other sites where the performers had pubic hair and use it to update this site. The best example is on the main page where you see a video of Daria Glower. That thing has to be a few years old because she has been in the industry for a decade now and does not look like that anymore.

04-07-13  09:26am

Reply
47
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

No, that's close to the procedure I would use too. I'm just a bit tired having done so much work to identify what I've unloaded already.


Thanks for all the input and good words!


04-07-13  08:32am

Reply
48
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks, RB-

I do use a bulk renaming app (A Better Finder Rename) all the time. But with all the other research and renaming that has to be done to WAP's files and folders after downloads, renaming the image files themselves is just one more nail in the coffin. The vido files are so inconsistently named that bulk renaming doesn't really work: it has to be done manually.

THE FILES AND FOLDERS SHOULD BE NAMED PROPERLY FROM THE SITE.

As to VLC: I stopped using it a few years ago. If I remember correctly, it was because it kept losing prefs across updates. Again, if I remember, I had to enter custom prefs to get arrow-keys to serve for video FF/REW/SKIP functions; it was a lot of work and after VLC trashed that work I stopped bothering to use it. Again: this was years ago and I may not be remembering correctly.

The wmv files have 1440 horiz. resolution: better than HD video, and enough for me. They also save a bit of drive space, which accumulates.


04-07-13  05:55am

Reply
49
Visit Hairy Twatter

Hairy Twatter
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from tangub:

Maggie's review was written in October 2011 though. I'm not a member now but was about 3 to 4 months ago and at that time they had 77 scenes and were updating that site once a week with a new scene. The site tour now shows 93 scenes which is consistent with 1 new scene being added per week since my membership ended. I'm pretty sure you can trust what they show in the tour on DDF sites.

04-07-13  12:40am

Reply
50
Visit Cathy's Craving

Cathy's Craving
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I think that in Cathy's case. It's not so much the fucking as the kind she likes to do that is at the core of her situation. That woman simly loves or loved to have mutltiple partners all at the same time and that must take a toll on anyone.

I did see one scene dated in 2012 in the sextion where she has sex with fans so maybe she is still doing some of those. She hasn't really changed in looks since mid 2000 so it's next to impossible to be sure if the dates on the content are accurate.


04-06-13  12:16pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 495 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.85 seconds.