| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Nadine Jansen
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GUY22:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the reply!
I was a member on LF more than 6-8 months ago. I still have the videos from their previous updates. And, yes, they're super crisp. Nadine's videos though are not as high quality, but they still look incredibly sharp. I am 100% positive that these video are originally shot in 720P and not upconverted like a lot of other sites. However, I personally prefer Nadine's lactation videos and models to LF (or XX-Cel), because of the style of the videos. All of Nadine's videos look home made, very professionally home made. Whoever is directing these videos know what they're doing, none of these look amateurish nor low budget at all. This is like the X-Art of lactation sites. The videos are that well done. But Nadine only has three lactating ladies right now. Lactation updates are infrequent at best. I've emailed Nadine about this and it seems to me that she won't turn this into a full lactation site, at least not yet. As for the the models, she features a lot of familiar faces. Recently there are Shione Cooper, Valory Irene, and Katarina. And they're only featured topless and nothing below the waist. No pink at all. The most notable one is Vendy Star (aka Vendy, Westy), she's gotten really thick because of the pregnancy, and she has lactating boobs like you're never seen. The few exclusive models she does have are "no names". And they're GORGEOUS if you're into curvy, chubby, thick homely MILF type ladies with HUGE all natural boobs. These are real hot moms. There are some pregnant content from the past but not recently. And Nadine has stopped lactating maybe a year or two ago. I think there are about 250 video, about half of those are in HD, the older contents actually look pretty good to this day. Again this tech person/director knows what s/he was doing even back then. There are about 25 lactation videos right now and they're ALL in my iPod. Not enough for a lactation fan but here quality beats quantity. And I think this is a great time to be a member, maybe we can convince Nadine to turn the site into a lactation site if we get enough fans to join.
|
03-19-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
27
|
Chica's Place
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Good save on the creampie front - thank you :)
There's quite a lot of pre-boob job scenes, definitely more than two. No evidence of scars now, and I have to say, although I'm not a boob job fan, I think hers are pretty decent.
Thank you for the comment!
|
03-19-13 01:50pm
|
Reply
28
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Zoltan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the wonderful compliments! :)
I don't think you should expect too many more reviews from me though, as this is the only site I've been a member of over the past six months, and don't intend to join another site in the near future, as I'm quite happy with this site, as you would have figured out...
|
03-18-13 07:24am
|
Reply
29
|
We Are Hairy
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
My pleasure RB ;)
|
03-17-13 11:43pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
LOL. This should have been my answer, with 50+ having a slight advantage!
|
03-12-13 02:08pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I remember getting the email from the guy and having to read it multiple times to make sure I wasn't confused. The worst thing is that I really liked the site (aside from the streaming-only) and gave it a high score based on content but I said in the review that potential members needed to be aware that it is streaming only. As I recall now, his beef wasn't that I told people it was streaming but that I said he was unclear whether it was streaming. He pointed to his Terms of Service which were VERY vague as proof that he made it clear to people that the site was streaming only. I don't think the TOS was clear at all, and even so, how many people read the TOS before joining a site?
But I am still convinced that regardless of what he said his issue was, that he was really mad that I probably killed 90% of his potential business from PU members by pointing out that there were no downloads. (The site was new and hadn't been reviewed by the TBP folks yet.)
|
03-09-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ditto RB's comments. There is one site I really like with assholes in charge of the service function.
But apart from that, I will stay with a site that provides good support/webmaster interest and will drop a site after one month with a shitty webmaster when I have a need to contact him/her.
|
03-08-13 09:28am
|
Reply
33
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
An Irish Budda? The hat is for St. Patrick?
Your avatar has really changed over the years.
Somewhat frightening at first, but now almost friendly.
I'm hoping that reflects the change in your inner life. Lol.
|
03-05-13 12:20pm
|
Reply
34
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from lk2fireone:
Great review. Fine overview, and lots of nice details.
|
03-05-13 11:44am
|
Reply
35
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Funny, strange, weird...and then again not: got the same feeling: been a member of quite a few sites, lately - and the same sites as earlier....but how can you repeat or even update a review without getting bored....?
|
03-04-13 05:54am
|
Reply
36
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Denner:
Excellent review, RB. There seems to be some time between reviews from "we, ol' timers" here at PU - but this one seems to prove: better a few great ones, than "a lot of useless ones". And btw: I enjoyed the way you parted up bottom line - and it makes a fine, long review easier to read/overlook....this site could - also easily - be my next. Thanks.
|
03-04-13 05:17am
|
Reply
37
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from gaypornolover:
Superb review of what sounds like a superb site - I wish other sites would do something about watermarks - I knocked off 5 points for intrusive watermarks on my last review!
|
03-03-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Well seriously - it's not like we see each other in church on Sundays, so what is there to hide? Who else would you talk to like this? Maybe, just maybe your Doctor but then we don't cost anything do we?
|
03-02-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I had no idea, or noticed then forgot, that the user can change the icons of individual folders. In 7, I've found the collection of options (in "properties," of course), but even the transparent ones (there are a few) show that curving shortcut arrow. Still, it's a neat trick.
|
02-23-13 06:27am
|
Reply
40
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah - I'll have to think of a term for it.
I remember a scene with Jamey Robbins and Ron Jeremy where they are playing fuck face with her face and it is delightfully paced - enough where you can see it distinctly sliding back and forth down her throat.
As it is, one of the reasons I edit productions is to slow down the action. I'm not much into anal, but seeing Lily LaBeau squat her asshole down on Mike Adriano's cock needs to be slowed down.
Off topic - do you think Adriano asks girls not to fully throat him, thus giving the illusion that his cock is larger and more unmanageable than it really is? These thoughts have been creeping through my head lately.
I think when the invented Gonzo it equated out to Frantic Maneuvers. I think it only is suppose to mean, NO Plot. There are things I really like about Gonzo with the definition of no plot, inasmuch as plot tends to interfere with the sex.
Though I like the sound and feel of SexArt (lush for a better word) it probably is not a site I would subscribe to.
|
02-12-13 07:56am
|
Reply
41
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Not only that, I also think that most producers, videographers, and performers have no fucking clue about what is hot. Drives me fucking crazy.
|
02-11-13 07:41pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'm thinking of trying to cut my collection down a bit but it won't be a quick process. My attitude of 'save everything you can get' really no longer applies since storage is cheap, and I don't think this whole internet porn craze will be going away any time soon!
|
02-11-13 05:15pm
|
Reply
43
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I know! I have things I'd give my left nut to see.
I was fantasizing about a true spit roast where she gets dp's and does deep throat all the way down - repeatedly - Not some frantic face fucking, but just some slow and deep penetration she can handle - NO ONE does this.
I can think of only one star who actually tried this some - Alicia Angel in a five way... and still they didn't take their time. Oh well, so much for my fantasy of the day.
PS - Blowbangs should be this way too - slow and thorough and not over the top - something where you can focus on the actual blowjob rather than her being passed back and forth. I just saw Jonni Darkko's trailer for Wet Food 4 which is a blowbang and it is way too frantic for me to enjoy. Not that I wouldn't watch, don't get me wrong, but I'd never download it.
This is one of the reasons I don't usually like two on one - the best I ever saw at that was Scott Hancock & Chris Strokes taking individual turns with Rebecca Blue (Throated.com) - nothing rushed about that one!!
|
02-11-13 05:05pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Cybertoad:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
For you Budda there should have been who has and addition to their house to store harddrives LOL
|
02-10-13 10:32am
|
Reply
45
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
That would be a good deal, if you haven't seen the material before.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-06-13 02:48pm
|
Reply
46
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from RhyssAW:
Hi RagingBuddhist,
I can confirm Abbywinters.com has plenty of skin in its content. We release one Boy Girl sex video per month now along with one girl girl sex video a week. Along with several masturbation and solo videos.
Sometimes we get criticism for models not being revealing in their solos. But we let the models choose their level of comfort in terms of the level of nudity. But there is still plenty of hardcore content to satisfy the user who likes that.
|
02-06-13 02:52am
|
Reply
47
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from otoh:
I've not joined abby winters... but if you like the idea of natural Australian girls (although there may be less of them since they moved out of Australia?) I can recommend Girls Out West. It's possibly a bit more down to earth than AW, but there's plenty of explicit nudity and action there...
|
02-04-13 11:07pm
|
Reply
48
|
Pornstar Network
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from potatohead:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ragingbuddhist, if you like old stuff, you might want to try the Smithsonian,they have some really hot pictures from 1920.
|
02-04-13 07:42pm
|
Reply
49
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:
Well, this certainly isn't the old days. Used to be you make a comment about this site and at least 2 or 3 people would chime in. Guess I've got enough an answer now.
|
02-03-13 08:05pm
|
Reply
50
|
Pornstar Network
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Implants were still quite new and not yet as popular as they became.
It is sometimes too bad for guys like us who remember a time when the girls who had large breasts did so because of Mother Nature and not a surgeon's knife.
I also found the statement ancient to be quite funy when talking about porn made in the last deacde or so. It's even strabger when you consider the age of the poster. I like ancient porn because I much prefer the movies made in the 70's and 80's.
|
02-03-13 11:06am
|
