Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (902)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (93)  |   Replies (778)

Other:   Replies Received (509)  |   Trust Ratings (61)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 509 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from turboshaft:

Great review, RB! I've been thinking about joining this site for a while now--well, really just Wet and Pissy, as those two words encompass nearly everything I seek out in porn--but if this is the same price for two additional sites, it's obviously the better deal. I guess I'll wait a little while on a review once I join (and don't want to risk carpal tunnel syndrome either!). Your comments on camera work are also a lot more than what I usually manage, the typically redundant "Me see naughty parts in video. Me get horny."

Also, your reply to graymane about use of the term "puffy," that "Big TACOs are the Labia Masters" is hilarious (though I would think the title "Labia Mistress" is more correct). If that were a real award or title it would be one I wouldn't think twice about accepting! :-)


01-06-14  05:40pm

Reply
27
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from graymane:

Exceptionally fine review, RB ....... but then I wouldn't expect less from you.
When they say "Puffy" are they referring to those lovely, swelled, lusciously protruding pussies? Cuz I do love'm puffed up like that!


01-05-14  08:05pm

Reply
28
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Monahan: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Nope. And large and/or puffy areolae isn't either, is it?

11-03-13  01:53pm

Reply
29
N/A REPLY TO #16 from turboshaft: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I think "a turkey baster full of fake cum" describes more than a few sites--hell, a whole genre at this point.

10-23-13  07:18pm

Reply
30
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Thedebilman666: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thought so

10-23-13  03:34pm

Reply
31
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Thedebilman666: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

If you want to start a bitch slapping contest you better bring your A game, so far it's an F game you're bringing to the table.

10-23-13  03:29pm

Reply
32
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Thedebilman666: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Get over yourself.

10-23-13  03:04pm

Reply
33
N/A REPLY TO #5 from turboshaft: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

There's a vague maximum limit for me whenever I have to stop and ask myself "Is this even porn?" And this doesn't even mean something looks painful or abusive, just a simple case of what the fuck! But a lot of BDSM/Kink.com-style stuff is generally unappealing to me as well.

09-15-13  01:30am

Reply
34
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Addict:

Easy way to beat porn spam especially if you use webmail.

1. Never use your main email for subscription of porn services, it happen to me plenty of times when my subscription ends I get increase of spam.

2. Use an email account that allows use of alias, I only use alias to join sites when subscription ends I delete that alias.

3. Set rules to sent emails from certain alias to a new folder if the email service allows you to create custom folder that. So you can always just delete everything from that folder.


08-20-13  07:53am

Reply
35
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Marcus: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I know, I think you mis-understood what I said :)

I mean that I have a separate email account for using to join websites. That way, when I do inevitably get lots of spam (which I do...), it doesn't matter because the only important emails I'd get to that account are the membership confirmations which are the ones you can flag/star.

That way, apart from the principle of it, I don't really care I get spam because I never check that email account anyway.


07-29-13  10:48pm

Reply
36
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Peeper: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I have the same problem with an other site. I don't think they sell my address (hope so), but maybe the registration page is not safe. Maybe a third person can track/read the given personal informations (a cookie or something like that).

07-29-13  09:27pm

Reply
37
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Marcus:

Urgh, so annoying when this happens.

I have an email account just for site subscriptions because of sites like this. When I'm a member of a site I just flag/star the confirmation email so it stays up the top, then I don't have to sift through the junk emails.


07-28-13  11:57pm

Reply
38
N/A REPLY TO #17 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Throw a smart ass comment my way, expect to get bitch slapped back.

07-22-13  11:59pm

Reply
39
N/A REPLY TO #15 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Sounds like I'm down on the pier, listening to old men tell bullshit fishing stories.

07-22-13  11:32pm

Reply
40
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I'll still go with expert opinion, it's urine, women can't shoot ejaculate out of their vaginas like a freak in a circus side show.

07-22-13  11:19pm

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Randyman: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Used to date a squirter, we both got sick of it and made a consult with the gynecologist. She told us that it's quite common, and that the "squirting" is urine, coming straight out of the bladder, and it's an involuntary reflex. She informed us that some women squirt because the penis is poking the bladder, some women squirt when orgasming, and some women can do it at will. I'll take the opinion of an expert any day. Ever watch a chic squirt in a video? Notice how it's squirting right out of her pee hole? Women orgasm through their vagina, not their pee hole.

07-22-13  08:12pm

Reply
42
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

To their credit, it is mentioned clearly in the Terms of Service. But 15 downloads per month??? That's insane. It looks like another attempt to foil pirates that only hurts legitimate paying customers.

07-21-13  08:13am

Reply
43
Visit Met Art Network

Met Art Network
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from lk2fireone:

$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.

{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)

A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.

IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.

JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.

ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.

THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.

BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.

METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.

THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.

LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.

LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.


06-29-13  09:55pm

Reply
44
Visit Met Art Network

Met Art Network
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from pat362:

I agree with you that the cost is a little high but seeing as these are all top notch sites then that shouldn't be an issue for people looking for a good deal. The time needed to surf all these sites is a bigger hurtle and one that might make some hesitate joining.

Another problem and possibly the biggest one is that the although all the sites are top notch. Is there really a lot of variation from one of these erotic photography sites to the others in the network? If there isn't and most of the women appearing on one of the sites also appears on the others than all you are getting is more of the same. The only one that seems to distinguish itself from the others is sexart but that is because it's more midcore to hardcore than the others and may not appeal to fans of the other sites.


06-29-13  09:51am

Reply
45
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from thaavi: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

All the data here: http://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review

06-03-13  03:37am

Reply
46
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from messmer: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

No doubt Abby Winters wanted some free advertising at the time but I was a willing participant and no, I never expected compensation nor did I get any. I was just glad to spread the Gospel of, what I thought was a great site at the time. I do agree, however, that a flood of extremely short, favourable reviews, might make one suspicious!

06-02-13  10:06pm

Reply
47
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from ChaseGC:

In the Viv Thomas forum, subscribers to IDreamOfJo were asked to write a review here, so I did. I've never heard of pornusers.com .

BTW, I've been a member of several of paysites listed by rating, and I would not give DDF Production any more than a 50 - you couldn't give me a membership to such trash- and you guys have them at #5. So much for the over-rating BS.


06-02-13  12:11pm

Reply
48
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Cybertoad:

On the site issues, I try Chrome and Maxthon both give good feed back to test a site I do find Firefox faster .

06-02-13  07:45am

Reply
49
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.

06-01-13  05:46pm

Reply
50
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from thaavi: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Why you people are so suspicious. Why you just can´t believe the site is that good? No, mistress really didn´t sent us. Admin told us about possibility to write our opinion here, so some of us did. That´s all.

06-01-13  05:00pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 509 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.39 seconds.