Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (908)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (96)  |   Replies (781)

Other:   Replies Received (514)  |   Trust Ratings (61)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 514 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from greg909:

Yes, it's true that many of met-art's sets are not very sharp at all. More specifically, they often have low depth-of-field (one part of the body is in fairly good focus while everything else is not.)

Lack of sharpness is also more apparent on this site because they offer very large images (sometimes 7000 pixels), so the softness is very apparent. There are, however, a few photographers who offer better sharpness, like Matiss. I just wish it was more consistently good across other photographers' sets. Still, most viewers just wax poetic about every set that's posted there, which makes me laugh.


07-05-15  01:54pm

Reply
2
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Drooler:

I know what the RagingBuddhist talking about here, but I've seen the blurriness problem with HegreArt, MPL Studios, etc. etc. as well. I can't think of a site that hasn't disappointed me when there's a pic I really like and the model's face, on closer inspection, is in something of a blur.

Suffice to say that photographers and photo editors can't predict what I'm going to want, so I just try to take the good stuff and toss out the fuzzy-wuzzies that I don't want.


07-04-15  05:07am

Reply
3
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from PinkPanther:

I'm not seeing it - I'm checking out the Loxie by Antonio Clemens set, posted the other day - viewing it in the High Res selection, and while there is some "softness" to the image in the face area frequently, which I see in every site except for ATK, which is all about glaringly direct photos, I don't see blurry and distorted. Mesoti by Antonio Clemens, posted yesterday, is even sharper.

I think it's a matter of taste. In the glamour area, you're pretty much always going to see treatment of photos. Hegre is sometimes an exception. You can often see every bit of facial hair on his models at the same time that they are undeniably presented in a very glam-art mode.


07-03-15  06:55am

Reply
4
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks for the clear explanation.

I've read reports by some PU members that mention distortions in photos, and now I better understand what they were talking about. Because I always thought the photo quality was perfectly acceptable.

Using a smaller monitor, and almost never zooming in for fine details, explains the difference.


07-03-15  01:47am

Reply
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from lk2fireone:

I agree that MetArt has tons of content and thousands of lovely models.
Maybe there is too much content, and the average viewer starts to get bored. A psychology thing.
Very few of the videos at MetArt are worth watching or saving.
That's my opinion, in spite of how lovely the models can be. The vidoes are boring, not erotic.

The value of MetArt is as a photo site.

Maybe I'm not sophisticated enough, but I don't have any problem with the technical quality of the photos. In the main.

What sites do you find that give you satisfaction with the technical quality of the photos?

MPL Studios, Femjoy and Hegre Art offer superior softcore photography.

And how do you view the photos? On a very large monitor, or wall screen TV, or what? What makes the photos at MetArt appear blurry or distorted?

I look at photos on a laptop, or a 22" computer monitor. So I'm guessing that's why I don't have a problem with blurry or distorted photos.

A very large monitor would show the imperfections more easily, I'm guessing.


07-02-15  10:34pm

Reply
6
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from skippy:

I took them up on the Nubile-films and Joymii 2-for-1 offer. It was a great deal. I also saw a Femjoy $14.95 for a month offer but apparently it was only valid for a few days and I missed it. Make sure to sign up to their newsletters so you don't get left out of the deals!

01-17-15  06:13pm

Reply
7
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from FE Publishing:

Both Nubiles and Femjoy rarely offer the site off at 50%, it might happen once a year and then it expires. What we do offer though is buy 1 site and get the second one for free, meaning paying the full price but we give you a second site for free. Let me know if you are interested in more combo deals!

01-12-15  01:46am

Reply
8
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from lk2fireone:

I also got some "free offers" to join Femjoy by paying $30 to join Femjoy and Nubiles.

That's the beauty of advertising: Create words to describe things in the best, most attractive way. Forget logic and common sense... For $30, you get Femjoy and Nubiles, which is the the list price of Nubiles by itself, so you are getting Femjoy for "free".

Anyway, this morning, I got a Christmas special email offer to join Femjoy for $14.95 for 1 month.

That's not "free". But maybe it's half "free"?

LOL.


12-25-14  07:02am

Reply
9
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from exotics4me:

Yeah I got those too. It looks like it's their way of saying you get a site for free if you pay for another site or at least that's what the ones I'm getting are saying.

12-24-14  03:22pm

Reply
10
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

You raise an interesting point that I've never considered - that the site access as a bonus to the other sites is different than if you joined through NVG. I have nothing to go on but speculation, but I'm guessing that the site access is the same whether you get a membership as part of the ECG/BRCC/NVG or whether you join specifically through NVG and get access to the other two. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that point.

10-28-14  03:20pm

Reply
11
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from rearadmiral:

I was a member there up until about three weeks ago. I have to say that of the three sites that come with that membership (Exploited College Girls and Back Room Casting Couch being the other two) I think NVG is the weakest. Some of that is subjective so Iíll try to explain.

My primary reason for joining when I do (Iíve joined maybe five or six times now) is to get access to ECG. BRCC is a great added bonus that adds value to the membership but NVG is a take-it-or-leave-it part of the deal. The scenes are all fairly well done and many of the models are attractive (though some arenít) so on that scale the site does okay.

Where the site really falls flat is in site design and technical stuff. Iím a fan of simple site designs but NVG looks like it was designed in 1995 and not updated since then. Iíve never found a search mechanism though there may be one. The only way Iíve ever found to sort the videos is by a bar at the top of the screen that allows you to sort by year. I donít know how that date would work with a remastered video. Once youíre on a specific year page you have some very small thumbnails that really donít assist in deciding if you want to download the scene. I canít recall if there is any better way to see the model before downloading.

Speaking of downloading, if there are downloading options Iíll choose MP4s and look for 1280x720 if itís available. That depends on the bitrate too as Iím looking for the best compromise between video quality and file size. The files are MP$s but if there is an option for different resolutions I didnít see it. Even the most recent uploads are only 656x368, 2500kb/s and 29fps. That resolution is very low by todayís standards. If Iím incorrect and there are better options for downloading I hope that someone else will weigh in and let us know.

There is a big element of subjectivity here, but if this were a stand-alone site I wouldnít join unless the price was under $10. The site itself and the video quality are too far below industry standards. But (and this is subjective again) Exploited College Girls is a great site (though the attractiveness of the models is slipping a bit in the past eight months) and Back Room Casting Couch is a good site so if you have any interest in those Iíd recommend joining and you get NVG as a bonus so you can explore that.

As I said, I donít have an active membership there now but if you have any specific questions I can try to answer them. I hope this helped you a bit.


10-27-14  02:50pm

Reply
12
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from jook: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I'm not sure what benefit to other users a review would serve. I literally spent under 45 minutes on the site and there's not much to add then what's in the comment. And I'm not going back there because there's not much else to see and I'm afraid I'll suffer sever psychological trauma if I have to look at it again, haha. Again, still feeling my way around, but doesn't the comment serve the same warning that a review would?

09-03-14  02:13am

Reply
13
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from anyonebutme:

Last time I checked, you have the option to not sign up. Is this no longer the case? Either the material is worth $50 to you, in which case you'll buy, or it is not worth $50 and you will pass.

08-25-14  06:36pm

Reply
14
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from littlejoe:

i bought a $25 visa vanilla gift card and the site took it no problems

05-27-14  10:38pm

Reply
15
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Glad I could help. I got burned with the XXX Pawn thing so stopping you from joining Haze Her or Dancing Bear is a little bit of payback for me!

05-22-14  04:10pm

Reply
16
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from Khan: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

RB, we very rarely contact webmasters to tell them about posts here. When they create their account, webmasters have the option to be notified whenever something is posted to one of their sites. We encourage wm's to communicate with users and point out to them that it usually helps their site's image.

But beyond that, we only contact them on rare occasions. For example, VegasKen has contacted the WM of a certain (GGG) site several times trying to help users get accounts canceled or get refunds. It happens but not that often.


05-22-14  05:13am

Reply
17
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from rearadmiral:

You are lucky about one thing - at least when you clicked the join page you found out that it lacked encryption. I had an email about a new site called XXX Pawn a few weeks back that looked interesting so I clicked the join button to see what the price was. What I didn't know was that it was a Bang Bros site and they had retained my credit card information so I didn't get any price information - I was signed up. At $20 for a site with six or seven scenes. And true to Bang Bros form with all of their add-on sites, cancelling was not easy. Since Haze Her and Dancing Bear are Bang Bros sites, if you join make sure to start the cancellation process well in advance of a rebill because you may need that time to get the membership cancelled.

Bang Bros has some great porn but the have the business ethics of the mob.


05-21-14  04:28pm

Reply
18
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

Hey Khan - Do you guys ever contact sites to point them to comments here? Like I said above, I wrote to these people and they never responded. Not a great first impression and maybe a harbinger of problems to come if I signed up, but I'm really curious about this lack of encryption.

05-21-14  02:59pm

Reply
19
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from lk2fireone:

I've encountered the same lack of security a few times.
When I went to sign up for some site, and when I went to cancel some site, the sites asked for credit card information, email, real name, etc.
So I never entered that information.
But unfortunately, I am now getting spam emails with my real name in the heading, for porn and other spam offers, at my main email address.

I don't want to close my main email address, because it would take a lot of time and effort to have a different email address at sites I communicate with.

But it's a real hassle. Deleting all the spam I constantly get. I suspect that one of the porn sites I joined sold my real name and email address to spammers, and they sold the information to other spammers.


05-08-14  08:07am

Reply
20
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from LPee23:

I took a look 10 of their most recent videos to help answer your question. Except for the one fully clothed video, they all showed tits at or before the half way point. On average they showed tits just a couple minutes into the video. There were 2 videos that never showed pussy, and one that waited until after the half way point, but in the rest the models ditched their panties at about one quarter of the way into the video. It seems that they did change this in response to member feedback.

04-05-14  12:35pm

Reply
21
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Joymii:

Hi!

Thanks for voicing your concerns.
There is adult contemporary-style, intro and outro music that lasts about a minute, but there is no music during the action. You hear the models' real voices.

It's definitely not like 90s-style porn with no voice track and just music :)


03-17-14  01:46pm

Reply
22
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from abbywinters:

Hi Raging Buddhist,

I hope some members reply soon, but int he mean time, I'd like to update you. We took your feedback on board (it was not only your feedback, in fact). Over the last year, we have made a significant change in this.

I'd like to extend you an offer of a free membership for a week to see if the site meets your expectations now. If you hit me on garion.hall@abbywinters.com, I'll set it up.


03-17-14  10:47am

Reply
23
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from Marcus: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Apologies if it wasn't clear, I've updated my review now.

Thanks for the reply, though, and I'm glad at least someone read my review.


02-03-14  12:24pm

Reply
24
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from Marcus: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks. No, it's 50 tokens for a flash, not $50. 50 tokens is about $5 (or less, depending on how many tokens you buy), and with other people tipping etc, you shouldn't need to tip too often.

02-03-14  11:06am

Reply
25
Visit ATK Archives

ATK Archives
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Advent:

Good morning RagingBuddhist, I am sorry you are having issues with the link. here is the link that was in the mailer that went out. The offer expires on Feb 12th. I hope this helps. If you need anything else please let me know. http://www.atkarchives.com/join?promo=pr1299&cc=2389537

01-31-14  08:26am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 514 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.98 seconds.