THAT...I've seen it in some older movies - and it was just, well, what can I say: cute, sweet, innocent ect...............and: those were the days....before the world was a mess and went ugly.
Thanks for this info, careylowell!
That would seem right because IAFD says that Tracy's birthday is May 7 1968. That would mean she was 16 at the time. No matter how we look at it. She was underage. She didn't act or look like a 16yrs old. There have been quite a few rumors over the years that she planned her downfall. The main reason for the rumors is that she created her own production company and filmed the only legal Tracy Lord porn movie: Tracy I love you. She went to the authorites right after it's release. She made a killing with that single movie since she was still a very popular actress and the only movie anyone could own or sell was Tracy I love you. A couple of persons were sent to jail because of this and in their defense. She presented a valid drivers license. I'm glad she was able to find a career out of porn.
See Carey, I had a feeling this was going to go this way.
First, you are not required to read my posts if you don't like them or if they are not rhetorical enough or too rhetorical for you and Demosthenes.
Second, you say to keep perspective. You submitted this poll question, and haven't even posted your stance on it. So, for you to say that you were not advocating babies in a furnace, really has no meaning whatsoever, you haven't advocated either side of this very topic! A few of the members even showed some curiosity towards the topic, but you still didn't expand on it, explain it, or give your opinion. The question also does not give your stance away.
Third, you submitted a poll question, meaning you wanted opinions on this topic. I gave my opinion and for whatever reason, you admit in this (#19) reply that you were being a bastard towards me because of my opinion, which must differ from yours, even though I had no clue what your opinion was, see your words, "You're the only one on PU permitted to be a bastard?"
Fourth, of my hundreds of replies, which you are of course free to skip over, I've never been called a bastard or thought I replied in other way except to be helpful or to joke around with the member I replied to.
Of course you aren't going to argue my 2nd post, you would prefer playing flame wars like we were in the 5th grade. If my stance on the point hasn't been clear, it is nothing more than a rule that nearly all businesses have. It asks soldiers to "Not tell your sexual preference and we won't ask". Now, somehow this became about gays, but the rule is saying no one tell, so it isn't just about gays, until the wonderful American media put their typical sensationalistic twist on it and made it into discrimination. Rosa Parks, Dr. King, Jackie Robinson and millions of others roll in their graves about what is considered discrimination these days in America.
Carey, you dummied down my entire post. The post is about sexuality, not gender and the situation was hypothetically asked, not something that was tried to be seriously passed.
In life, a male or female is based on their reproductive organs at birth. Over time, puberty strikes and sexuality is born.
Somewhere around this point, it is not okay for males and females to take showers together. It really isn't just because one has a dick and one doesn't. It is because of the possible bad situations that could come from it. Most likely, but not completely, based on the males possibly sexually assaulting the females.
Going by that, if a gay man, who is sexually aroused by naked men is allowed to stand in a room full of naked straight men and get his jollies, then it is no different, hypothetically, then a straight man standing in a shower room full of nude women, getting his jollies.
Oh and by pointing out gender, it does go against the very question that was asked since homosexuals blur the line that gender is defined by. A gay man is a man by gender because of his penis, but is attracted to the same things sexually that a female is attracted to.
It is a very broad and likely uneducated statement. I never have been to one and never will. I do not see the appeal in hanging around a bunch of naked people with no sexual innuendos at least.
I know for one of two things would happen. One I would have a hard on the whole time, thus embarrassment. Or I would be extremely limp and shriveled, thus embarrassment. I am sure people do not say much about it there, but I would still be very self conscious and not get a lot of enjoyment out of it. Perhaps this is all my ignorance showing through, but I do not intend on finding out personally.
So if you have been to a few and can testify that there are good looking people there than I will stand corrected at your word. I have seen many nudist videos and picture scattered over the internet and extremely rarely is there anyone that i would call attractive. That is the bases for my opinion, however weak of a base it may be. But you wont find me sitting naked by the lake with my buddies!
I don't know if most guys shooting porn have discovered the tripod yet. But the videos at this site are less herky-jerky than at some sites which can almost give you motion sickness.
I gave you a positive trust rating on 02-19-09 with the following comment: "Good reviews, more recent ones with lots of details."
So I don't think there's anything wrong with your reviews. I think they provide a good flavor of the sites you write about (details and opinions beyond the basic site statistics).
But thanks for the thumbs up on my review.
And I also agree with your idea that most East European models are getting paid peanuts compared to what American models make. That's a good part of the reason why there was such an explosion of porn coming out of East Europe: the cheap production costs.
But what I am really thankful for is the number of physically attractive young models. Some of them are truly lovely. More on the softcore side, but a number in hardcore as well.
Just for clarification it is 5 years I believe, I just read an article bout a child porn case that was resolved the other day. But, we all get your point!
They have Gianna Michaels among others, I am pretty sure she is checked for age and diseases. Besides, they due use condoms.
Basically, there is nearly zero real reality porn out there. The site could not sell it if it was true reality because of the age issues and other legal stuff. It is just a fantasy! Just like sites like Brazzers who have the girls dress up like teachers or nurses, it is not real. It is just to help you imagine doing that yourself.
I can not say my email address was sold by them, but perhaps by some others. I get tons of penis enlargement adds among other things.
But I must ask why you joined the site if did not think you would like it? If you wanted out within minutes because of the content type you should have been able to see that before joining. I can not say this is my favorite site on their network by any means, actually I believe it is the worst. But I believe you are being a bit harsh since this does not seem to be your sort of thing. Be like many of us on here giving a gay site a 50 just because it had no women. I think the idea of the site could not be misunderstood, hell it is even in the name!
I haven't been a member of score land for 5 years. Maybe 8 years might be a bit of an over statement. 5 years I'm sure of . She was doing mag layouts and some solo video. I don't think I recall any lezzie. She had a nice hairy cunt in some of the layouts.
Can you tell us how big the site is. I am just looking for an idea. I like to know if there is 10 videos or 500. It makes a big difference on which sites I join and when. Also, video and picture quality information would be nice.
I remain totally pissed at these jokers at the way they defrauded their members with their old DRM waiver scam back in 2005 and 2006.
But when they offered a discounted membership to PornUser members, I thought I'd give it a go to see whether the site now offered the old content without DRM.
So I went in to sign up to find out that the discount was not really available after all, and no response from their customer support people. (After notifying Khan, the discount offer was pulled down from the PU listing.)
The technical flaws mentioned in this review were common when I was a member and apparently still are. These flaws are very rare in other sites but the folks at Danni.com don't seem to give a shit and let them continue rather than correct them.
So the bottom line is that this site continues to screw its members with false promises and a terrible customer support attitude.
Sign up at your own peril. But I refuse to give these Bernie Madoff types $25 of my hard earned money to be ripped off yet again.
In compar5ison to most other sites I find DDF Prod to be superior in many (most?) respects, such as video quality, variety (DDF has several specialty genres like Hands on Hardcore, House of Taboo, etc.) and the mainstream 1 by Day, all of which have extremely well produced exclusive content.
Yes, a few of the older material remains in multiple segments but the vast majority is done in one complete video.
The only issue of significance that I have is that some current updates are not available in WMV format and can only be downloaded in MOV (Apple)format.
The scoring is always a subjective matter but, having been a member of well over 30 sites over the last 6 or 7 years, this site (network) remains a leader in my opinion.
I would say that this rating is a bit harsh, specially if you keep it at 75, considering the ammount and quality of the content you get. I too don't like the "Sapphic Erotica" bonus sets, and I am glad they are discontinuing them, but even without those, you get a handful of sets every week, with high quality, good- to great-looking models and in different niches (solo, mf, ff, feet...).
DDF has its flaws, as every network or site out there, but it's still up there on top for me. Hotlegsandfeet, in particular, will always have a special place in my heart :)
I have installed AVG Internet Security 2011, and checked the HandsOnHardcore pages. It didn't give me any warnings. One of our developers took a quick look, he hasn't found anything out of ordinary either.
Please send me the exact address or page AVG warned you about, and we will look more into it. It might be a false alarm, but such issues are important.
SexVideoCasting - basically all scenes have vids, and about half of them has photos, I think you have missed them somehow. You can browse them on both ddfprod.com and sexvideocasting.com.
EuroGirlsOnGirls. You are right, these were bonus photo sets from Sapphic Erotica, an addition to our normal weekly updates. New Sapphic bonus sets are not added anymore.
I think all the girls answer casting calls in newspapers or sex mags.
It is important to point out that all the girls are English (which you can deduce by their noticeable accent), so I'm going to say that unless you live in England and are familiar with English porn sites, more likely than not you will have never seen the girls the site features.
>Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere?
It's funny that you mentioned Abby Winters later in your review - If you look close enough, I think you'll find at least one or two girls from Abby's on the site. The ones that spring to mind are Ainslee and Antoinette, but I'm pretty sure if I dug through what I have saved from the site there were more. I Feel Myself, Girls Out West and AbbyWinters are all Australian based, so it wouldn't surprise me if some of the girls are also on GOW.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.