Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mudman (36)  

Feedback:   All (40)  |   Reviews (29)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
Reply of mudman's Review from williamj:

I agree Teenrotica is a good site but it needs more work. I thought the videos where totally poor in quality and content. The pictures where great if your a shaved teen fan, but they tend to repeat in likeness from pic to pic. The models moving an inch or the photographer just slighty moving the camera becomes a bit boring. The girl is right there looking all spunky and ready to go but the camera person is stuck in slow speed just clicking at the same angle. So much lost potential. The poor quality of the videos really turned me off from this site. The big wait as quoted can make or break this site.

09-30-07  01:02am

Reply
2
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)
Reply of mudman's Review from messmer:

I am glad you mentioned Sean R. Not only do his models look grotesque with their exaggerated make-up but the quality of the photography itself is terrible. I skip anything with his name on it and so should ATK.

09-26-07  12:56pm

Reply
3
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from DivBZero: (mudman's Reply)

Hello Mudman

--- I'm confused by this. I used to be a member and it was one photoset per day. I just checked on the free tour and:

"EVERY DAY A NEW PHOTOSET OF BEAUTIFUL TEENS !

Neverending in search for addictive content? We deliver you the most fascinating, fresh & unique imaginary visions you've ever experienced on a daily basis. +++ ADDITIONAL FRIDAY SPECIALS +++"

Which I guess means two sets on a Friday.

Anyway, I'm thinking of becoming a member again. I remember the cookie cutter sets that needed a little editing, but one can really forgive them because of the 1 in 10 cracking sets that pop out.

Regards

DivBZero


06-19-07  02:52pm

Reply
4
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from Matt Frackas:

This is Matt from Matt's Models.

This review is so far off base I can't see how it would be of any value to anyone looking to accurately research adult sites.I also felt it more of a personal attack than an informed review. Here's my response to some of his nebulous claims below:

My reputation is "questionable"? What does that mean or imply? My reputation in the adult industry is immpeccable. I spent 10 years building it. It's only validated by the success of my site, my members, my reputation with the 1,500 models I've worked with, the awards my site has won and the deals I have struck with other reputable companies for producing some of the best Amateur content on the net.

Suggesting our photos were scanned from magazines is a statement I've never heard before and implies that we infringe copyrights of other photographers.

All of my material is 100% exclusive and has always been shot by us. I just looked at the 2 latest photos updates and they are 1067 x 1600 pixels and clear as daylight - unless you have a vision problem.

You CAN find many (not all) our models on other sites, but we are often in the first batch of sites to shoot U.S. models, if not the first - have been since 1999.

We take all valid complaints into consideration as we are always trying to better Matt's Models.
Example: "only 4 thumbs per photo gallery". In fact we had 2 options for members (4 and 20). However the 20 thumbs gallery view was an alternate - some people were missing the 20 thumbs option. As of this week, we changed the default view to the 20 thumbs view.

I felt this reviewer took liberties with the original "terms & conditions" of Porn Users. For example: Do not give "general opinions and little or no reasons to justify them."

Mudman does exactly this. He makes blanket, unclear statements with no evidence, no examples, no reasons, no proof.

How is that useful to potential members?

- Matt


03-30-07  11:46am

Reply
5
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from BostonPJR:

Always enjoy your reviews mudman, even when I disagree. I do agree combined with ifeelmyself, this would be a top notch site. Was wondering if you found anything about the join options that seemed unusually difficult. That's what has kept me from joining so far. The sort of half membership vs. full membership option.

03-20-07  06:36pm

Reply
6
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from roseman: (mudman's Reply)

lol, there is no doubt that you did a ... cover.

03-15-07  05:57am

Reply
7
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from qualsite34: (mudman's Reply)

Okay, maybe nobody really merits a 100%, but to me these reviews are subjective and serve as a consumer guide to potential users. The 100% is a curved grade which represents my opinion of how the site fares in comparison with all other amateur sites I have seen. Since Abby Winters is cutting edge, and appears to be so superior overall to anything else out there, this is my way of representing this site as reference standard for the amateur niche. If I were to pick one area where another site has surpassed Abby, and this was very recent, I would pick Simons Scans because they upgraded their videos to include the MOV format option coded in H.264.

03-14-07  11:23pm

Reply
8
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from roseman: (mudman's Reply)

I agree that no site deserves to be rated with a pure 100 %, nothing and none is perfect so it is logical but ... from the other hand we must consider what a user expects from a site when joining, all I mean is that if he / she finds the site totally cool and totally enjoys it then rates it with an 100, as he / she thinks that's perfect. That is why trust user feature was enabled.
Giving rates of 100, in my personal opinion, is not good for the site, because other users/people think that the review is prolly biased and you don't help webmaster(s)/owner(s) make things better.
I gave a positive '' trust user '' vote to qualsite34 because I liked another site review that he did and I am sure that he must have a reason of giving this site a rate like that, maybe we should let him give some explanation.


03-14-07  01:32pm

Reply
9
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from SnowDude: (mudman's Reply)

Thanks for the extra info here too! One question: Do any of these softcore sites have girls with shorter hair? I love anything above the shoulders but the shorter the better! I have been on the prowl for hardcore sites, but Khan (of the admins) thought I'd have better luck at some of the softcore sites like this one. It's not a huge deal and I wouldn't give it more than 5 seconds of thought, but I'm just curious of anything stands out to you...if so, I'd like to know! Thanks again.

03-12-07  03:33pm

Reply
10
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from SnowDude: (mudman's Reply)

Thanks for the info Mudman! I have always thought it would be cool, but softcore can get a bit dull after awhile and I was concerned about the limits of what you can see. No doubt there must be some awesome clips though and the site just needs some more time to fill up the archives like you said. If they did combine the sites and provided a small discount, I'd be there in flash. Actually, I'll probably join them at some point anyway, but if you told them that they probably wouldn't think of offering that discount thing I mentioned. ;)

03-12-07  03:28pm

Reply
11
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from SnowDude:

I just left a reply on another of your reviews asking for more info which I could exactly replicate here. With a score of 84, I'd really like to hear more!

03-09-07  09:03am

Reply
12
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
Reply of mudman's Review from SnowDude:

I'd really like to hear more on this site than what you provided unless you areally found it that boring. If so I'd stay clear, but to me a site with a rating of 84 means it's still pretty good.

03-09-07  09:01am

Reply
13
Visit Kick Ass Pass

Kick Ass Pass
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from KickAssVic:

Mudman, Thank you so much for taking the time to write up your review. I have a few follow up questions i hope you would answer for us. Thanks.

You said the updates are "clumsy and questionable updates. Maybe they're happening, maybe not." since we update the network (and www.kickass.com) every single day, could you clarify what you mean?

You disapproved of our "single video format" does this mean that you prefer to download videos broken into smaller clips?

Thanks - I'm looking forward to your answers.


02-19-07  01:00pm

Reply
14
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from roseman: (mudman's Reply)

LOL.
Well, mudman if you have ANY questions about the concrete website that I did review please feel free to ask.
I feel that answering to your general questions about photos and videos has NOTHING to do with this site.


02-06-07  07:29am

Reply
15
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from roseman: (mudman's Reply)

Okay, I see.

02-02-07  03:51am

Reply
16
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from roseman:

Greets mudman,
I just read your review for Hot Wives And Girlfriends, what do you mean by saying '' Photos are just okay at best '' ? You mentioned that at the cons section.


02-01-07  01:06pm

Reply
17
Visit Little Mutt

Little Mutt
(0)
Reply of mudman's Review from Khan:

I haven't been inside this site for a while but was wondering about your comment, "the size of the photographs are marginal".

If memory serves, their images are 800x1200 (1200x800 landscape) and as you've noted, always sharply focused. So, if that size photo is "marginal" what size would *you* consider ideal?

Also, just to help everyone put this into perspective, what monitor resolution are you using?

Thx


01-25-07  11:50am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.39 seconds.