Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : MiztaBlu (28)  

Feedback:   All (59)  |   Reviews (15)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (37)

Other:   Replies Received (64)  |   Trust Ratings (30)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(2)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Mike at Ztod:

Hey we had a real issue there for a short period with a horrible design. We have spent weeks updating it. I would love if you would give it another shot on me. email me at m at ztod.com and I will give you a free pass to take a look again.

04-11-13  12:10pm

Reply
2
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(5)
REPLY TO #13 from jberryl69: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

Oh... sorry - I sort of thought it was directed to me since it appeared in my New Replies box. Have a good day.

03-18-13  04:48pm

Reply
3
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(5)
REPLY TO #11 from jberryl69: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

I thought I pointed out in my review that it was my subjective opinion. Plus, since it wasn't such a sterling a review, I directed people to check out Slutty's review since he took the opposite view.

Last paragraph of the review:
"There might be something for some of our readers (I highly recommend Slutty's review below), but not for me and thus I can't even give it a "might recommend" score."

Porn site reviews are similar to movie reviews. As an example, Rex Reed bashed both Silver Linings Playbook AND Jennifer Lawrence (going so far as to say "There's nothing wrong with the overrated Jennifer Lawrence that some serious acting lessons couldn't improve.") I, 92% of the critics on Rotten Tomatoes and apparently the Academy disagreed, but I know that is just Rex Reed.

All in all, I think it was an accurate assessment of the site and my reaction to it. I don't believe I said anything that was untrue.


03-18-13  02:09pm

Reply
4
Visit Jules Jordan

Jules Jordan
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

If you're not into anal then you may want to skip any of his sites. At least half of the content on this site is anal and/or dp and since the other site is called Ass Factory than it's a pretty safe bet that it will also be filled with anal.

Since his site is only 30$ then I don't have an issue with price. It is more expensive than many other sites but Jules movies have always been more expensive than most. I haven't bought one recently but I seem to remember than they were about 28$ as compared to 20$ for the ones from most of the other studios.


01-09-13  06:50pm

Reply
5
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(3)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from luv lickn clit:

Thanks for the review and heads up! If I had had the first 2 incidents happen to me, I'd have never gone back.

01-09-13  08:04am

Reply
6
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(6)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from luv lickn clit:

Thanks for the excellent review! Sounds like they are really going downhill.

01-08-13  04:46am

Reply
7
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(6)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Marcus:

Thank you for the review. The stealth upsells that people have been mentioning in the comments have completely put me off the site, despite the positives you list. Also my jaw dropped reading about the scrolling watermarks in the videos - they must be losing the plot if they think these things are what paying members want to see.

01-08-13  12:35am

Reply
8
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Capn:

IMO what is needed generally; not just at this site; is more eroticism & less of an obsession with gynacology.

I like to see the whole woman more than we get to do.
Clothed, partially clothed & with clear full body nudity.
Not with acrobatic contortionist poses to graphically exhibit intimae, or hands obscuring the view.

Cap'n :0/


12-05-12  11:31am

Reply
9
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from messmer:

You are very accurate in your description of the picture sets. You wanted to see more "ass," I wanted to see more panty shots and never got what I wanted either, which was at least a couple of frontal pictures with the model standing straight, panties still up, but every damn photographer (and not only in AllOver30) shows them taking off their panties either from the side, leaning slightly forward or from the rear with them half-way down their buttocks already.

My long standing complaint has also been that they wear only a couple of items of clothing which they take off in an awful hurry and then you get the "poor direction" you are objecting to, an endless repetition of almost identical poses.

At one time I would have objected to your score but during my last subscription I got so angry over one set of a model I had looked forward to seeing, (the photographer put her into a most atrocious gym outfit that could have been bought at the Sally Ann) that I told them to keep the rest of my subscription which still had two months to run. So, until mature models wear mature clothes once again and until they get rid of all those superfluous shots I completely agree with your assessment.

Not only a good review but a necessary one! In the past I tried to be too objective .. glad you called it as you saw it!


12-05-12  10:24am

Reply
10
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from otoh:

Just as I was going to call you a fag... :)

Great review, MB - this is a site on my list too, but agree completely about sets that concentrate too much on the same shot!


12-05-12  06:30am

Reply
11
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from rjmcgill:

I belonged to this site for long enough to get twelve added sites. One per month I think is what you get. I would have to agree with this review of this site. Alot of the addon sites they give you access too are of older content. They are very good but I think over all the site is seeing a decline in content. Good review. Not off target at all in my opinion. Finally gave it up after the addon sites started to get worse.

07-17-12  04:45pm

Reply
12
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from pat362:

Can you download all the videos or are you limted to only those added in the last month?

07-17-12  10:50am

Reply
13
Visit Hustler

Hustler
(1)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Comment from Monahan:

MiztaBlu,

Having been badly burned by the Hustler site several years ago I have largely ignored this site. But there are some babes exclusive to Hustler that I'm interested in.

Has the download problem been resolved to your satisfaction?


07-07-12  03:27pm

Reply
14
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
REPLY TO #13 from Claypaws: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

Thanks for the feedback. I think, to be fair to the site though, you are just saying you were annoyed because the DLMs did not work the way you configured them. You might even find that that the IE login trick works with Opera and Chrome too but I have not tried that. I don't like IE but I don't mind having to log in once ;-) I certainly hate "save as".

As a matter interest, what browser and DL combinations did you try?


06-09-12  03:12am

Reply
15
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Claypaws:

Just an update on the download manager (non-)issue.

I have just signed up to this site as it is one of my regulars and I shall write my own review soon.

Meanwhile, I thought you might like to know that Free Download Manager still works perfectly on this site if you do what I said. I have just tried it.

To summarise what you need to do to use Free Download Manager with Firefox:

Cookies must be enabled in Firefox and in Internet Explorer.

In Firefox, you need the Flashgot addon.

Log into the site using Firefox, ticking the box telling it to remember your details.

Once, and once only, log into the site using Internet Explorer, ticking the box telling it to remember your details. You can then close IE and you will not need to log in with it again for the duration of your membership. In fact, you will not need to log in again with FF either. Your login stays current for your whole membership.

Set Flashgot to use FDM as the download manager.

Do not enter any login details in FDM. It does not use them. It gets all login data from your cookies.

Click any download link.

Tell Firefox to use Flashgot and tick the box to always do it.

Thereafter, you can add downloads to FDM with just a single left click.

I downloaded in full speed mode, two files at a time. Absolutely no problem at all. I will revert to DTA because I prefer it but FDM works fine.


06-08-12  05:02pm

Reply
16
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
REPLY TO #9 from Claypaws: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

Hi

I understand your point on the hardcore and that you liked it even though it was outside your usual niche. In many ways, I wish the sites that are good on photos would drop the hardcore completely and say so in their tours. They get more criticism about their hardcore videos than anything else. The presence of hardcore itself makes little difference to me since I do not download it. But, unless the sites do it like the classic hardcore networks which use pornstars and big budgets, they get attacked by people who join expecting a kind of hardcore that the sites simply are not equipped to produce. And I would hate for them to realign their budgets and methods towards satisfying the hardcore niche. You see, there are plenty of excellent sources for such hardcore, such as NA, Brazzers, Reality Kings. Those networks have a huge amount of content too and you can fill many terabytes with it. But there is so much less available in the photo niche. Before long, we photo lovers will have nowhere left to go.

In some ways, I echo your own comment in your review of Naughty America regarding Kentucky Fried Chicken and hamburgers. Hamburgers are to KFC what NA style sex is to Karups. Karups do not have the big titted pornstars or the scene types that NA and Brazzers have and the Karups tour is completely different in style from the Brazzers and NA tours. I think it is unrealistic to expect such hardcore in Karups or ATK. I know I can look at the Brazzers or NA tours and immediately and obviously identify that those sites are not for me. I can understand why they score high in their niche but it is obvious that they have nothing to offer in my preferred niche. I am slight;y surprised you even considered that KarupsHA was worth joining since their tour does not give much suggestion that their content would be what you were looking for. I think it is a credit to it and to you that, when you did, you gave it a balanced review and a reasonable if tough score.

On the DMs point, you say you tried many DMs in Firefox and Chrome. But did you specifically try adding your downloads using the FF Flashgot extension and did you try logging in once with Internet Explorer and saving the login details? If the answer to both of those is "no" then you would not get DMs to work well on Karups. An extra part per video is honestly just one more mouse click once you have used either of my two workarounds.

And if you use DownThemAll in Firefox, you can queue and run the downloads without even adding an external DM. DTA works perfectly on all the Karups sites because the links never time out, your login never expires and so you can even schedule DTA with a bit of effort. And you can set it up for single click downloads if you want to.

I do regard it as a valid criticism when sites will not work with DMs other than DTA. But Karups' actually do work with my workarounds unless something has changed since I last used DMs there.


06-04-12  02:37pm

Reply
17
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
REPLY TO #5 from Claypaws: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

Thanks for calculating the number of models. 1470 is 40% more than Nubiles, which is probably the most similar site. It is about 80% the number of models on DDF network. I entirely agree it has much less hardcore video than a hardcore network. I notice you like Brazzers, Naughty America, Reality Kings, Video Box. Their hardcore is really in a completely different style from Karups or ATK. Your loved networks have a kind of more hammed up, produced style and theme. Karups is more a kind of straight plain sex. This is why I tend to say I would expect ATK (or Karups hardcore) to disappoint hardcore hounds. The networks tend to have "nasty" sex. "Nasty" being a complimentary term relating to rawness of the sex.

I think your review is completely honest about your preferences and readers should easily be able to adjust for their own preferences. For me, a photo hound, it is one of the truly great sites.

I can add two things you might like to try out at Karups, if you have not already done so.

First, the download manager thing is largely a cookie issue. I do not know what browser you usually use on the site. My standard browser is Firefox. However, not all download managers correctly handle Firefox's cookies.

There are two workarounds. One is to add the downloads to your download manager using the Firefox addon, Flashgot. This manages cookies better than most download managers can manage on their own.

The other workaround is to log in using Internet Explorer. You only need to do that once during your membership. Check the box that says "remember me" or "save login" or some such similar thing, I forget exactly what they call it. Then you can close Internet Explorer. The IE cookie is then set and lasts for your entire membership. Download managers that look for IE cookies, which is many of them, then work flawlessly. I discussed this with Karups support and they said they would add it to their help files.

The other thing concerns the split videos. I am sure you already know this but others might not perhaps. If you drop the multipart (usually two part) videos onto the playlist of VLC Player, they follow on seamlessly as if they were a single video. Karups put the legal 2257 stuff only on the first part so there is no interruption from that on the second part. (There might be some very old videos where there is a repeat of 2257 but I think they were mainly on KarupsPC not KarupsHA).

Anyway, good review and I enjoyed reading it for a site I know well and like a lot.


06-04-12  11:49am

Reply
18
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Claypaws:

Certainly a well thought out review. Like Cap'n, I would put my score around 85 or even slightly higher but I am exclusively a photo guy.

I disagree on the network point though, from the point of view of a photo guy. Unfortunately, Karups seem to have ruined their tour and I cannot see the current number of models. Perhaps you can find or estimate that within the members area. I join this site a few times per year but I am not currently a member. However, it does have a lot of models. If you compare the number of models with say, the DDF network (1868 models), it might not look so bad. And it definitely has more photos than most networks.

I agree that it is more of a photo site than a video site and that is a strong attraction for me. But sites that concentrate on photos have a problem. The problem is that so many porn users only want video. If a group of sites that specialise in photos offer the same kind of network price as the video networks do, they cannot make enough income from their members to keep in business.

Most of the photo specialists do not offer network membership for that very reason. MET, Karups, ATK all have multiple sites without a network and they often have more models than the networks do.


06-04-12  07:22am

Reply
19
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review from Capn:

A well thought out review. It is nice to get a perspective from a video guy. For me, it rates probably around the 85 mark as I am a photo phreak. :0)

I do agree about your network point though.

Cap'n. :0)


06-04-12  01:25am

Reply
20
Visit MILF Mania XXX

MILF Mania XXX
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from pat362: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

A weakness on some of TBP's reviews is that they'll take a site's word when they claim exclusivity of their content. I forgive them this little oversight because I'm an old old pro when it comes to review sites and there truly is no other sites remotely close to TBP and now PU.

I only checked a couple of the videos myself and I know they are on some of the streaming sites but I don't know if they are also on sites like Videobox or VideosZ. The ones I looked at weren't but that doesn't mean that some or many aren't. If the site was a little less expensive or there was a lot more content then it might not be that bad but there doesn't seem to be more than a 130 or so videos and 20$ for non-exclusif content is high. Especially when some of it isn't all that new.


06-01-12  06:25pm

Reply
21
Visit MILF Mania XXX

MILF Mania XXX
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Comment from Khan:

FWIW, I notified the TBP Editors and they've already added a note that (according to a user report) the content isn't exclusive.

See the MISC section at:
http://www.thebestporn.com/review/milfmaniaxxx/


06-01-12  02:36pm

Reply
22
Visit MILF Mania XXX

MILF Mania XXX
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Comment from pat362:

Although I am certain that many of these videos are available on other sites. How many of them are available on download sites? If the bulk of the videos are only available on streaming only sites then they are in the right to say exclusif since they offer their customer he ability to download the scene.

You did make some excellent point and I do think it's important to submit an error report since the review is quite new.


06-01-12  11:56am

Reply
23
Visit MILF Mania XXX

MILF Mania XXX
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Comment from Marcus:

Make sure you click the 'Report Error' link on the left and notify them.

06-01-12  09:01am

Reply
24
Visit Hustler

Hustler
(1)
REPLY TO #7 from rearadmiral: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

I'm not trying to minimize what's going on, but I'm wondering if an explanation is that you and I downloaded mostly different material and that could be why you're experiencing a problem and I'm not. I downloaded 647 scenes that are mostly legal teen and anal themed. If your interests are big breasts and MILFs then it is possible that while we both had memberships at the same time we were downloading completely different stuff. Just a thought.

Of the 647 scenes I did download many of those were uploaded more than two years ago. Some date back nine years. You report having problems with mpg files (which you note were uploaded more than two years ago) and of the 647 scenes I got from here only four of those are mpgs and the remaining 643 are WMVs. Maybe, just maybe, our different interests meant you got more mpgs.

Please let us know how you make out with this.


05-11-12  07:23am

Reply
25
Visit Hustler

Hustler
(1)
REPLY TO #6 from slutty: (MiztaBlu's Reply)

Artifacts would be compression defects, like when it gets all blocky and strange looking.

I looked through what I downloaded about a year ago, and it was mostly wmv's, so perhaps they changed their formats? I didn't really see any mpg's in what I downloaded there - and some of it was quite old.


05-11-12  12:28am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.17 seconds.