| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Alison Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turismo:
(roseman's Reply)
If there is anything else you would like to know please ask!
|
02-24-07 03:11am
|
Reply
27
|
Amanda Lexx
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Khan:
We'll have the TBP editors take a look and update the listing as soon as they can confirm this price change. Thanks for the heads up !!
|
02-24-07 05:19am
|
Reply
28
|
Amanda Lexx
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
from SnowDude:
Hey roseman! I've been a big fan of your reviews, but your score is 20 points higher than TBP. I don't doubt that you think this is an awesome site for even a second, but what do you think accounts for such a large gap? Let us know!
|
02-22-07 08:21pm
|
Reply
29
|
Ancilla Tilia
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
from Cybertoad:
Look like it woukld be a nice site to check out but wow price and limited contenet, why do sites do this, I always shy away if the price is high and the content low.
|
08-10-08 10:52am
|
Reply
30
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Shap:
(roseman's Reply)
You are right. the photoset is a mistake (I'm getting on the team now to fix it). The videoset is similar but not the same. Sorry about that.
|
04-13-09 09:26am
|
Reply
31
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Shap:
I believe that is a mistake. I'm going to have the guys look into it first thing tomorrow morning.
Shap
|
04-05-09 08:46pm
|
Reply
32
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(roseman's Reply)
therfore it is a nice idea with the "wishlist"...damm that it isn`t launched until now, would be a nice thing if she is doing some hardcore as a wish as well :)
|
08-22-08 08:32am
|
Reply
33
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(roseman's Reply)
I certainly agree...don't think she's into it, but some fine b/g hc or even lez would be fantastic.
|
01-20-08 10:35am
|
Reply
34
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(roseman's Reply)
Thanks!!!
|
01-20-08 10:17am
|
Reply
35
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(roseman's Reply)
Hey roseman, it really is a great site and with you loving boobs, hers are implants, but they look good on her. Reminds me of a blonde Eva Angelina. You do kind of feel strange after joining it since you can download everything in a day or two, depending on your speed, but it was still worth it for me.
Thanks for the reply.
|
10-04-07 08:04pm
|
Reply
36
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from williamj:
The downloads from this site and all the other sisters sites is really amazing. Whatever software they use should be standard for every other web site. They do a great job in pushing that ass right up on your screen fast...
|
10-04-07 02:45am
|
Reply
37
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from apoctom:
Could you give some figures for what speeds you are getting? For instance, what is your connection speed and what speed is the download? Like the previous reply, I often don't think about download speed when signing up, and then it just drags over my high-speed cable connection. Thanks in advance.
|
07-02-07 09:23am
|
Reply
38
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Jay G:
Thanks for the info! Speed is something I don't often think of when choosing web-sites until I try to download and it takes...................forever. Thanks for the good info!
|
06-12-07 08:41am
|
Reply
39
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mudman:
(roseman's Reply)
Roseman:
Now I'm lost. Which cut in stone web site are you referencing. You've review 27 of them.
Every site needs to offer a basic basis of quality. Every member or potential member deserves this much. Videos need to accessible to all and photos need to be clear, seeable, large enough and somewhat appealing. This certainly places some constraints upon artistry, but not unreasonably so.
Are you suggesting that anything goes, if the particular site's subject matter agreed with your or whomever interest, is okay? Seems an insufficent standard to me. Everything out there need to live up to more, as the majority is falling way short. We user/members feed this beast with our subsciptions, our money, so we should get quality regardless of the site. So I find so problem on not addressing any one failing site over another. The problem is in the system. It wants us to accept too much mediocrity as some form of quality. "Here's a great site, now spend you money and be unhappy with it."
I don't think I'm opposing you, but we may not be being as clear with each other as would be desireable.
mudman
|
02-06-07 10:29am
|
Reply
40
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
from mudman:
Roseman_
You've hit me, so here's my inquiry.
What do you find wothwhile when it comes to photography? What size of image and what quality? Do you have interests in lighting or not?
Are there photographers you are impressed with or are you being ignored here?
With regards to videos, regardless of subject matter what isues to you have? Every site should offer enough formats for all to enjoy, and every video should be clear enough for anyone to see and appreciate. Since I'm even mentioning this, it's not something we've been burderned with. Which sites, in your opinion, serve us viewers as we should be served?
|
02-05-07 10:59am
|
Reply
41
|
Asses In Public
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(roseman's Reply)
Actually. I could agree with that for the entire network! Granted the updates they do put up are pretty good sized, they still could use more.
The site alone is still pretty small. The sites are designed to work together more than be 19 separate sites or so. Updates to each site takes a little longer because the update in a rotation, at least the sites at are updated.
|
03-11-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
42
|
Asses In Public
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
from badandy400:
Just though it would be worth mentioning that this site is based of a network of sites, as this review mentions. But do not be scared of the size limitation. Asses in Public is a very new addition to the network. Across the network there is around 600 GB. I can account for 550 GB that I have downloaded, and there is some new stuff I have not got around to yet. I agree that AIP is small, but the whole is huge!
I definately agree about the pictures...they need to grow. there is now excuse for small pictures when a nice Digital SLR is less than $1000. They also should be shooting the videos in HD, those cameras not that expensive. If they would do that they would have a network that would be hard to top for the boob lovers like me!
Nice review!
|
03-10-08 05:53pm
|
Reply
43
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(roseman's Reply)
I see your point.
|
10-27-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
44
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Drooler:
Because I liked it so much, I took a long-term subscription to Babelicious and I'm now on my second one. One plus is that more often they've been putting out more girls or photosets that I've not seen before, though some of the women are rather old for my taste.
It has improved in overall quality (pics max at least at 2000px), but there's a catch: fewer overall updates. Why? Because they're now down to two active sites that you get with the membership instead of the four you used to get. And this has happened during my second six-month membership. The other inactive sites are just archives now.
So sorry, but I actually don't agree with the opinion that the site is improving. It's still good, for sure, but it's not the good deal it used to be.
|
10-25-08 03:30pm
|
Reply
45
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Denner:
Agree with roseman - this site has something special - and is still getting better....
|
10-25-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
46
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Denner:
Hey roseman
Did you join? Can we expect a review?
One review I really rely on is the one from exotics4me, but it's from April - so it'll been great with e newer one... (and this is not any distrust towards Gonzo84 or Boodyluver666)
The site looks fine, but right now I'm into 10-12 other sites - gotta slow down for money reasons.
|
08-25-07 06:43am
|
Reply
47
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from jd1961:
The photos at Babelicious are much better
|
08-20-07 09:08pm
|
Reply
48
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from exotics4me:
That's called stuck between two women who are tens and you have to pick just one! One thing to think about is if pic size matters to you, if so Babelicious beats Twistys easily, Babelicious has some of the biggest pictures I have seen. The videos between the sites are similar. Twistys has Babelicious beaten in quanity. Though, Babelicious has bonus sites that are actually quite good. I'm a member right now on Babelicious and was a member last month on Twistys. The best way to put it is if you haven't tried one, take that one. Both sites overall are very similar in models and overall quality. Same price too and here is another similarity, both sites have great staff working for them and will answer any questions you ask. So, my advice is, take whichever one bends over quickest!
|
08-19-07 11:50pm
|
Reply
49
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Nick C:
Hi Roseman, thanks for taking an interest in our site. I'm willing to give you full 100% moneyback if you join our site and are not completely satisfied - Can't say any fairer than that :D
|
08-19-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
50
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
from Denner:
Understand dillema.
Firsthand I'd choose Twisty for one reason:
Most videos I've seen from Babelicious are a bit blurred. But I've not seen their latest.
Twisty gives you crisp videos, but some of the content can be found elsewhere.
Photos are mostly great at Twisty - not sure about Babelicious
The babes are almost the same, but again a plus for Twisty with a larger amount
|
08-19-07 11:00am
|
