Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (95)  

Feedback:   All (730)  |   Reviews (45)  |   Comments (85)  |   Replies (600)

Other:   Replies Received (369)  |   Trust Ratings (59)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 369 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Suze Randall

Suze Randall
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from luv lickn clit:

Excellent review! I wonder if Suze will follow Holly's lead, and let Met-Art take over management of the site. Check a little down in the comments for the link about Met-Art managing Holly's site.

01-31-13  08:29pm

Reply
27
Visit Cougars In Heat

Cougars In Heat
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from freaksoul666:

I wonder if you could tell me whom you sent an email for canceling your membership. I have been unable to cancel my membership and therefore have been billed for months. Thanks.

09-10-12  11:19am

Reply
28
Visit Hot Wife Rio

Hot Wife Rio
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from hiker: (Wittyguy's Reply)

While download limits may seem trivial, they accomplish one thing, limiting our access to the web site. If I decide that I will limit you to 300 meg per day, then once you reach your limit today, you are locked out until the next day. If you can not go on the site the next day, you lose that access time that you paid for. So, to limit my bandwidth, thus save myself money as a web site owner, I set a download limit. Not all web sites do this, however, the ones that do donít appear to care about you the customer, but, only to take your money. The second problem with this, as is the case with Rio, is that they donít tell you what the download limit is, just cut you off until they feel like letting you back in. I have emailed them and received no reply as to what the download limit is..

09-06-12  06:26pm

Reply
29
Visit AT Kingdom Network

AT Kingdom Network
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from Capn:

Definitely agree on this one.
Too expensive & not enough flexibility.
I don't want all the sites but I do want more than one.
A reduced premium 'Any 2' 'Any 3' type options would be a lot more tempting.

Cap'n. :0/


03-02-12  11:20am

Reply
30
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from Monahan:

This review should be read by every webmaster in the porn site industry. Based solely on this review, the price/quality ratio makes 18X Girls a winner for me. I'm signing up without reservation.

If only other sites with great material would understand that pricing their product too high costs them a lot of revenue in exchange for their slightly lower bandwidth cost.


02-26-12  08:01pm

Reply
31
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from TheSquirrel:

Ah, a Wittyguy review, likewise welcome back. Good to see a decent comprehensive review. Looks like a nice site.

02-24-12  05:59am

Reply
32
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from Capn:

A comprehensive review.

Very pleased to know you are still around.

Welcome back, my friend.

Cap'n.


02-23-12  05:38pm

Reply
33
Visit Anal Teen Angels

Anal Teen Angels
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from TheSquirrel: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Cheers Wittyguy. Like you, I have been busy and not able to spend a lot of time here lately. At least it stops me becoming jaded. This review has been in my files for the last three months, or at least the notes have. It takes hours to put it all together. Like many of the regulars here, I take pride in doing as good a job as possible.

Being named manager of the English Football Team, and outed as PU contributor, especially with my tastes, would give the tabloids a field day. I am going to have to work on my tax evasion first to stand a chance. At least we have an excuse for losing to the Lithuanians, in advance.


02-09-12  12:17pm

Reply
34
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (Wittyguy's Reply)

I think DDF and 21sextury would be in the same boat as double view since you'd still have to download 2 different versions of the same video to get the 2 camera angles and you also have to download the special player.

12-20-11  06:33am

Reply
35
N/A REPLY TO #12 from slategrey: (Wittyguy's Reply)

This statement is only valid if you dont think phone sex is cheating. Which i do (it got the word sex in it :s, gotta be cheating)

12-19-11  05:40pm

Reply
36
Visit Playboy.com

Playboy.com
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from elephant:

They would and could I agree do so much more and rake it in if done right, they have the name and the quality of women to work with. Look at other successful sites and see how they are doing it, they always give so little away on the tour pages, it boring pointless trailers with showing nothing, fair enough it's never going to be hardcore here but at least get a little more daring and show more lesbian stuff, that would bring me in, show updates and proper trailers for each update, newsletters with showing stuff, its creates interest, if you give away nothing and show so little to the viewer to what they actually will get in the membership area people lose interest fast.

11-06-11  02:35am

Reply
37
Visit Playboy.com

Playboy.com
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from slutty:

Is it even any different? Seems as though you still might have to pay extra for the .tv site. All it looks like is a revamped front page, who knows what it looks like inside.

11-05-11  09:23pm

Reply
38
Visit Playboy.com

Playboy.com
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from Capn:

Too little too late indeed!

All I see in the tour area is hype & razzamatazz.

You can get access to a free gallery if you give them your email address so they can spam you!!!!

Whoop de doop!

Cap'n :oE


11-05-11  09:48am

Reply
39
Visit Playboy.com

Playboy.com
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from rearadmiral:

Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.

It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.

I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.


11-05-11  09:00am

Reply
40
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from anyonebutme: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Yes, you're right, used to be more exclusive in the past, not quite as exclusive anymore.

10-13-11  09:53pm

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #23 from Capn: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Nice trollish try, WG, but I ain' biting!



DOH!!!!!! :0D


Cap'n. :0)


10-12-11  04:20pm

Reply
42
Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Khan: (Wittyguy's Reply)

No, that ok. If you missed it then someone else might too. Perhaps your remark will draw more attention to the fact that the trial is limited.

10-04-11  12:45pm

Reply
43
Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from Khan:

Did you forget to check the TBP listing page?
http://www.thebestporn.com/review/teenpinkvideos/

I ask because we have it marked as a limited trial.


10-04-11  12:18pm

Reply
44
Visit Cosplay Deviants

Cosplay Deviants
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from jberryl69: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Yeah!!!! Lint Balls.

10-03-11  03:07pm

Reply
45
Visit Cosplay Deviants

Cosplay Deviants
(0)
REPLY TO #8 from messmer: (Wittyguy's Reply)

You are right, Wittyguy. I would never subscribe to a site like this one anyway. Just making a general statement on "streaming only" and how much I dislike it. No harm in advertising that dislike a bit! :-)

10-03-11  09:55am

Reply
46
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from gaypornolover:

I HATE that, thanks for warning everyone. We've got to stop using sites that treat their customers so badly so we can raise standards across the industry. Porn consumers are like any other comsumer, we are paying customers and entitled to great service and respect, not to be ripped off!
Who handles their billing? I'd complain to them and demand a full refund on the basis you were misled. If enough people do that it might have an effect, as well as warnings like yours on sites like this!


09-19-11  04:43pm

Reply
47
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from elephant:

Thanks for the heads up on this one, yeah not a fan of sites that don't say clearly this isn't a full trial you can and only sampled content. If you piss people off they tend to not go back.

09-19-11  03:14pm

Reply
48
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(9)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from slutty:

nice review wittyguy, this is one of those sites I keep thinking I should try sometime, but just never get around to it. Probably scared off by their homepage that tends to highlight the altered ladies.

07-11-11  08:40pm

Reply
49
Visit Lolly Hardcore

Lolly Hardcore
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from mr jam:

Some good advice by lk2fireone to sign up via teen mega world for $19.95. However like you Wittguy i signed up for the $1.00 trial on lolly hardcore because it said full trial on pornusers. Couldn't get any access to the videos whatsoever. Just had links to upgrade to full price for lolly hardcore (which was $29.95, $10 more than teen mega world and the same group of sites). It was only $1.00 and is obviously an admin error (be it PU or the company who owns the web site) but that small error just put me off continuing my membership. shame.

04-25-11  08:17am

Reply
50
Visit Gaping Angels

Gaping Angels
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from lk2fireone:

Fine review, as usual. Lots of nice details and overall summary. Impressive.

04-14-11  11:35am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 369 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.03 seconds.