Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Mr Fountain (50)  

Feedback:   All (120)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (25)  |   Replies (72)

Other:   Replies Received (83)  |   Trust Ratings (38)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 83 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Digital Desire

Digital Desire
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from zachvenice: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

We are currently working on a new member-area that will come later this year and have a more logical breakdown of content. Our new updates are all going up with atleast a 1600px resolution. Thank you for your input!

08-25-09  11:10am

Reply
27
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from BabyGetReal:

I subscribed about a month ago, no problem logging in. I canceled as the end of the month neared, and again, no problem, got a confirmation email about my canceling, and it was easy. No suspicious activity on my credit card, either.

08-23-09  06:20pm

Reply
28
Visit Only Carla

Only Carla
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from Jeffrey99:

Nice review. I was a member about a year ago. Unless something has changed, I think it'd be beneficial to point out that it's pretty much a topless only site. When I was a member, she never showed full frontal. I understand you said not for those that like hardcore but I'd consider her site very very softcore.

Other then that, great review.


08-22-09  07:44pm

Reply
29
Visit Digital Desire

Digital Desire
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from zachvenice:

Our members area has a search form at the top of every page. You can just enter in a model's name if you want to find all her sets. Additionally, we have a top-rated button from our member homepage that can direct you to our members' favorite sets and/or models. We are working to simplify the navigation/categories. We are reprogramming our whole architecture based on reviews like yours, so thank you for taking the time to comment!

z


08-17-09  08:54am

Reply
30
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from Denner:

Good tip - thanks!

BUT - once again the currency-problems makes it no good - try to join from Europe - you have to pay euro 19.95 - or $ 27 something......
Incredible that those major billing-companies has not made regulations after such a long time and so MANY inputs/complains about this....


08-15-09  10:37am

Reply
31
Visit Only Silk And Satin

Only Silk And Satin
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from dracken: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Thank you very much for clarifying this. The site sounds great and while I don't really LOVE photos I might consider it. It sounds very good.

Thanks


08-09-09  02:56pm

Reply
32
Visit Only Silk And Satin

Only Silk And Satin
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from dracken:

While softcore is not my thing this site has me pondering. I might give it a try due to the very attractive looking girls and the interesting idea (I have a small fetish for clothes) I only have one question. How many shots have a focus on legs and stocking? almost all models in the preview section looked like that would be a focus of the shoot.

Thank you


08-09-09  06:34am

Reply
33
Visit Only Opaques

Only Opaques
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from mbaya:

A very nice, fairly complete description as to what can be found on the site. My compliments.

07-18-09  09:55pm

Reply
34
Visit ATK Petites

ATK Petites
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Actually, I'd like it -- LOVE IT -- if ATK Galleria would reiusse in 1600 pics of some of their earlier models. If they have the originals in larger sizes, they could do it. They wouldn't be the first to do such things.

I have a list of models in mind, but it would require some digging through my collection to say whom and in which collection. But I'd be happy to make suggestions if they were interested.


07-06-09  01:29am

Reply
35
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from PinkPanther:

I joined in late May, so I haven't been rebilled yet. I did receive a confirmation that specifies that I'll be rebilled for $29.95 every 60 days so it is not a one-billing cycle deal as they have done at times in the past.

07-01-09  08:51pm

Reply
36
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from lk2fireone:

I joined about the same time as you, for the 2-for-1 pricing of $29.95 for 60 days. I have not been rebilled yet, but the offer specified that the renewal price was $29.95 for every 60 days.
I never got an email confirming my membership, or the price that I was supposed to pay, but I did get access to the site the same day I signed up.


07-01-09  05:34pm

Reply
37
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from Wittyguy:

I've never had a problem with billing or cancelling after joining Karups. It's been a while since I've been a member but they've been using the same billing processor for years so I think you're OK.

05-15-09  12:35pm

Reply
38
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from Drooler:

Eent's been alright by me. I've subscribed to KarupsPC and KarupsHA more times than I should unashamedly admit, and I never had any problems.

Unsubscribing is pretty easy, too. They've never run me though any annoying tricks and delaying tactics as some other sites have.

It's just a matter of giving them two bits of identifying info established at signup and you're cancelled.


05-14-09  01:26pm

Reply
39
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(2)
REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Thanks for the tip. I will study pornclubcard to see if I can use it in the future. I've had 1-year memberships at met-art in the past, so I might try it that way the next time, unless I go with a 1-month membership.

05-14-09  11:16am

Reply
40
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

Gee - could it be that they woke up and realized that they'd overpriced themselves?
Good pick up, Mr. Fountain!


05-11-09  04:12am

Reply
41
Visit Sardax

Sardax
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from lk2fireone:

What about the fantasy art of Frank Frazetta, Boris Vallejo and Luis Royo? Frazetta started working in the 1940s, Vallejo in the 1960s, and Royo in the 1970s. They all have erotic elements in much of their artwork. Royo probably more explicit than Vallejo who is more explicit than Frazetta (a reflection of when they started working and what was allowed at that time). You don't have the formal stories supporting the illustrations of Frazetta, Vallejo, and Royo, that the Sardax site has. But Royo has come out with illustrated books with an implied storyline.

I grew up on Frazetta as a teenager (his Tarzan covers, paperback book covers), discovered Vallejo in the late 1960s) and liked what he did. Only found out about Royo in the 1990s, but like him very much.

Do you enjoy the artwork of Frazetta, Vallejo, or Royo? Or is it specifically the femdom aspect of Sardax that you enjoy, and much less looking at the female figure in artwork?


05-01-09  02:53am

Reply
42
Visit AT Kingdom

AT Kingdom
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Denner: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Guess you're - very - right about the videos. My score is related to me beeing hook on videos - and here ATK lacks some - the amount and girl-quality of photosets alone is probably worth a better score...you can browse forever and forever...
The same goes for Karups, BTW - This user finds that site a bit better, all around..


02-06-09  07:43am

Reply
43
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from Mr Fountain:

No, its nothing like the site you mentioned. There is no nudity. I do like the one you mentioned though. I like sites that show men kissing womens feet; face sitting and being ordered around. Though I may try another femdom site soon. The next one will be my second one. Actually, the only other site like this I joined before was sardax.com. But presently, I am looking at sites that are along the lines that you are talking about: owk.cz and theenglishmansion.com. The second one just very well may be my next femdom membership.

02-01-09  09:37am

Reply
44
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from elephant:

yeah very honest indepth review here thanx. do the women get naked though, teasing sites are not my thing if they don't in the end get naked. I do like meanbitches.com site though which is similar to this, dunno why i like been told i'm worthless though lol, also love Anna Gold aka Priscilla from russianmistress , the perfect mistress in my eyes.

02-01-09  09:12am

Reply
45
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from mbaya:

Even though the site does nothing for me, I must say this is a great review. Very well done. I feel like I have been to the site.

02-01-09  04:00am

Reply
46
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(2)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review from Denner:

Great review with a vast amount of info!
Been a while since last join-up, but the site seems to have grown quite a lot.
Agree with most pros and cons here - but my main "cons" was then - and it looks like it still have to be according to the preview: Way too short videos - average time for a videoclip about three minuttes...!


01-07-09  03:42pm

Reply
47
Visit Rigin Studio

Rigin Studio
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

I wouldn't say it's more worthwhile than the ones you listed. Those sites all have zips in 3 sizes (or more) plus large to enormous archives. Some of Rigin's stuff also shows up at MetArt, too, though it's not the same as at his own site, which really is exclusive stuff.

When I rejoined Rigin, I took the $100 for one year subscription. It was worth it to me for $8.23 per month. But the zips got pulled after I resubscribed. It put me in inenviable position of feeling that I had to let PU members know about this since I've been the one who has been following the site.

So now the large (3500px) shots can only be had by clicking the smaller pics, one by one, to have them enlarge. I've tried fussing with download managers, but frankly I think they're just another pathway to tedium since I'm not interested in every shot in every gallery, let alone every gallery, so I've never tried a DL manager with this site.

But I've decided to consider the rationale for pulling the zips. I see both Rigin and his subscribers as victims of piracy.


12-26-08  03:17am

Reply
48
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from EroticShot: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Mr. Fountain, thanks for your question..apology for the delayed response. I have joined a number of hardcore sites and found myself disappointed as the content is just too repetitive and non-sensual. Only Tease and a few other similar sites or fusion sites - like anything done by DDF - 1byday.com, femjoy and the like - have a more erotic approach to me that ultimately is more fulfilling. Just my tastes. I agree that the OT site has a massive amount of content. It's hard to really qualify - it's most likely thousands of videos and thousands of photosets. You really would need to spend a tremendous amount of time downloading to even crack into the content. They will let you download a lot of content - i don't remember a filter or site block in my time with OT. OT definitely does have a lot of repetition - same outfits, same sets - but their photographic work is consistently good. It's not world-class but doesn't strive to be.

The content at OS, OO, OM, and OC is highly, highly similar to the content at OT. Let's knock out Carla and Melanie first; these 2 sites are simply an assortment of each model's solo work. There is a fair amount of content at each - Carla has at least one hundred sets and Melanie is similar. They've each been photographed/videoed for a few years now - each month - they each will have 3-6 sets posted. I find Carla to be one of the most beautiful models on the net. She really seems to enjoy speaking with her audience... Melanie didn't do it for me...but that's me personally. They bot engage with the audience, speak to the camera, and open up in a playful, young-erotic sort of way. There is no or almost no dirty engagement...it's classic tease.

OS and OO are very similar to OT. The content generally does not repeat on OT. The content on secretaries and opaques is generally if not perhaps almost completely exclusive to those sites. Models recur between all sites. The volume of content on OO and OS is much smaller - a tenth at most of the OT site. However, that's still a lot of content. I would sum up - it's all about the visual - if you have a thing for the opaque or secretarial approach - you will enjoy the sites. If not...you have all the same models and scenarios more/less at the main site. I definitely find OT and its site family to be one of the best on the net.


12-24-08  06:21am

Reply
49
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from jd1961: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Thanks, I rejoined and tried it out.

12-20-08  08:45pm

Reply
50
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from Denner: (Mr Fountain's Reply)

Thanks! Tried to locate her in Femjoys preview - but no luck.

12-20-08  12:28pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 83 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2 seconds.