Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Goldfish (67)  

Feedback:   All (261)  |   Reviews (37)  |   Comments (17)  |   Replies (207)

Other:   Replies Received (113)  |   Trust Ratings (45)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 113 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(4)
REPLY TO #7 from exotics4me: (Goldfish's Reply)

Maybe the review did some good. Right after my membership ran out and I posted this review, six of their next eight scenes were boy/girl. With the other two being girl/girl. So maybe there is still hope for them delivering on a more hardcore site. On the other hand, one of those new ones has the female model covered in "stone" like a classic art statue. Those overly artsy sets alone push me away. I haven't even liked most bodypaint sets in the past. And the scenes give you a feeling you're supposed to watch from beginning to end, but I didn't find much story in them to keep me that interested.

10-08-12  02:17pm

Reply
2
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(3)
Reply of Goldfish's Review from marcdc1:

Great review Goldfish. I still love the production value, for what looks like a one man show he really pulls out all the stops in the quality department (both in terms of getting hot girls and kickass video production), and while the body mic are sometimes distracting, I'll take that over not being able to hear.

09-19-12  09:59am

Reply
3
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from marcdc1:

I remember when they introduced this and made it available in their preview section (I haven't been a member in a while now). I liked the concept but found that the filters really didn't give me things I was interested in. I moved away from VB because they seem to stock the same type of content over and over and I was looking for some more niche stuff.

I really do like the concept though and hope more sites experiment with UI. Especially the big sites that literally have a lifetime of viewing available. (which is something you've got to give to VB they have so much content it's mind boggling!)


09-19-12  09:50am

Reply
4
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from rearadmiral:

I always go straight to VB2 to avoid a lot of the gimmicks in VB3. My concern about this is that it would probably hog a lot of bandwidth for stuff you likely don't want to see. Is that the case?

09-17-12  09:16am

Reply
5
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(3)
Reply of Goldfish's Review from nygiants03:

Use to love the girls on this site, alot of new faces. Do they still chop up the videos though? I remember when I use to be a member they would chop the scenes and put the logo in between. One second there would be a blowjob going on the next they are already having sex.

09-16-12  10:04am

Reply
6
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from elephant: (Goldfish's Reply)

I thought they brought it down to $29.99 cause I got all excited it had been reduced, not so long ago I think it was, but I could be wrong with that and maybe it was another site.

09-16-12  07:39am

Reply
7
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from elephant: (Goldfish's Reply)

I'm not so sure, I have joined the last two times as a network so wouldn't be interested in paying $29.99 for one site and have to join all the others for $29.99 each.

09-16-12  07:02am

Reply
8
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(6)
Reply of Goldfish's Review from BabyGetReal:

Thanks for the helpful review, Goldfish. I've noticed that Eastern European girls, though beautiful, tend to be inhibited and passive in sex scenes, either not getting excited, or hiding their excitement/orgasms. I much prefer girls who show an interest in sex, are active participants, enjoy the scene, and let us know when they are cumming. How do the X-Art models do in these respects?

09-15-12  05:51pm

Reply
9
Visit Rob And Jill

Rob And Jill
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from gaypornolover:

Be careful - there's a notice on the site saying you're not supposed to use download managers at all and if you do they can cancel your membership and report you to CCBill.
That may be why you're having problems?


06-02-12  07:34am

Reply
10
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Cryton: (Goldfish's Reply)

There are a number of resolutions considered to be HD (obviously all are higher resolution than SD) including 720p, but to differentiate, the consumer electronics industry has deemed the phrase "full HD" should only relate to 1080×1920.

So you're quite right in saying that 720p is HD, but "full HD" should only be used to describe 1080×1920.

There's more at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080p


02-08-11  07:39pm

Reply
11
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #1 from slutty: (Goldfish's Reply)

They do, or used to offer custom clip downloads, so that could be considered a slight improvement I suppose...

02-06-11  12:32am

Reply
12
Visit Club Sapphic

Club Sapphic
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Review from messmer:

LOL. And you recommended this site to me? I could happily live with the older/younger theme .. but an abundance of tattoos and botched boob jobs? Never shall my money end up in their hands! :-)

02-04-11  07:09pm

Reply
13
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (Goldfish's Reply)

Thanks for the tip, Goldfish! Must take a tour of the place.

02-03-11  09:38am

Reply
14
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(3)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (Goldfish's Reply)

This is my second time in less than a year and at least my third in the last few years. I really enjoyed my last membership but the I'm ever more thrilled now with the addition of the 2 new sites. There are only a couple of sites that make my renew list and this one will.

I wouldn't be too sorry if some of the older content or those little fillers sites got flushed. I don't think they need anymore than 21 sextury needs their usuless leased crap.


01-23-11  10:07am

Reply
15
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from Cryton:

FWIW, "full HD" refers to 1920×1080, but 1280×720 is a valid HD resolution.

01-20-11  11:47pm

Reply
16
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)
REPLY TO #2 from hugow: (Goldfish's Reply)

I ended up contacting the billing agent, CC Bill, and to my surprise they credited me for the charge immediately.

01-04-11  01:30pm

Reply
17
Visit My Pickup Girls

My Pickup Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (Goldfish's Reply)

Outside is bad and it's worse in cars. Why try to film a sex scene where it's next to impossible to see any of the action?

01-01-11  01:06pm

Reply
18
Visit 18 First Sex

18 First Sex
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from Denner:

ANOTHER site from the Cyprus-based:
S&S Royal Limited ( just love that name, ho, ho).

(And to those europeans who claim that US-people do not know much about geography (Wikileaks) - Cyprus is a Greek/Turkish island in the Mediterranean.

Still the S&S does a lot of good, but again this new "deal" is simply just another site with the same content as most of the others...

Still, like lk2 states about the quality, I will submit: It certainly varies a lot at the network Teen Mega World - some sites have just very fine vids - some less - like this new 18 First Sex....to join that site only is a bummer - go for the network.
And maybe that part should have been made clear in the TBP "What's Hot".


12-02-10  05:48am

Reply
19
Visit 18 First Sex

18 First Sex
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from lk2fireone:

I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.

Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.

But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.

So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?

Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.


12-02-10  04:19am

Reply
20
Visit 18 First Sex

18 First Sex
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from lk2fireone:

I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.

Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.

But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.

So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?

Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.


12-02-10  04:19am

Reply
21
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Traveler: (Goldfish's Reply)

Every time I tried to download a video it would freeze about 5 percent in. Then I could not connect to their site at all including their help desk.
But I got through the E-mail and received a refund so that's that.
Too bad the site looked good to me.Moving on


10-28-10  03:26am

Reply
22
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #9 from messmer: (Goldfish's Reply)

I think you are right, Goldfish. The disappointment over so many blurry scenes made me forget that Porn Valley ain't Hollywood! :-)

10-07-10  10:07am

Reply
23
Visit Russian Teen Auditions

Russian Teen Auditions
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from Marek M:

Dude, seems you missed the other sixteen (16) sites and hundreds of videos you got unlimited access to with your trial membership. Russian Teen Auditions just launched, give them some time to get more content up before you start slamming them. $14.95 is not a bad price at all when you consider the huge volume of content you get access to.

10-07-10  09:34am

Reply
24
Visit Russian Teen Auditions

Russian Teen Auditions
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment from lk2fireone:

My best guess is that they are trying to make those pornhogs with fast Internet connections pay for slurping their site. Lol.

But don't forget that you get a bunch of bonus sites with membership to this site. So unless you have a massively fast connection, it's probably better to go for the 1 month membership.

I haven't been a member myself, so I have no idea whether you would think a 1 month membership is worth the money.

Even if I had been a member, I still wouldn't know, because individual tastes (and values) vary from person to person. :)


10-07-10  12:38am

Reply
25
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(5)
REPLY TO #3 from messmer: (Goldfish's Reply)

I always downloaded the streaming HD contents through a Firefox add-on called "Flash and Video Download 0.1" which gave me the intermediate size I like. (720p) The option to do so is no longer there because they've removed the HD button when you open the video. Now the choice is between the smaller non-HD mp4 file or the huge one. I would not have minded if things had stayed the way they were .. or if I had an extra large external drive to accommodate the huge files. :-)

10-05-10  08:51am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 113 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.44 seconds.