| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from FeckAdmin:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
With respect, you guys misunderstand our message. We don't deny we're porn - but we're GOOD porn. No faking, no lies about the quality and quantity of our content, genuine amateurs (mostly, a couple of our girls do mainstream porn as well), and high production values. And to the original poster, our stand on ethics isn't related to the content - it's how it's made, how the women are treated and paid, and the values represented. We don't judge people for their sexual perversions and in fact we dabble in them on the site from time to time, where the restrictions of the laws in our country allow. And we certainly aren't intolerant of any sexual act or flavour, you're quite wrong about that. Any consensual sex is fine with us (animals and children aside) but a lot of gonzo porn purports to show non consenting women, and we'd put that in the 'bad porn' basket as well, notwithstanding that it's fake. It's educating our kids, after all.
|
04-13-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
2
|
Rubber Tanja
(1)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RubberTanja Co:
Hello Ergo Proxy,
Thank you for your amusing comment. From now on DRM protected videos can be watched after membership expired. In the beginning we didn't secure our videos, but due to extensive copyright violation (more than 600 videos on torrent sites), we integrated DRM.
Best wishes,
Bianca, Lena, Samantha and Tanja
|
01-08-13 02:41am
|
Reply
3
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lyncher:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for your hint about writing a review and comment at the same time. After writing a comment I realized it would be better to write a review instead (more characters possible), but I couldn´t delete the comment.
However, the comment is deleted now for good ;-)
|
12-16-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
4
|
Strapon Cum
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I know that you and I kind of enjoyed this site and I know that we would both be happy if there was more content. In my case I would have needed more variaion but content was still one of the sites biggest problem and made even worse by the small amount of updates and the high cost.
|
12-01-12 11:17am
|
Reply
5
|
Strapon Cum
(2)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from pat362:
I'm not a member and don't plan to ever be agin but I only counted 96 videos in their update section while you had the total to 106 in June of this year and I had it at 76 in January 2011. The site ws never big to begin with and I personaly think that it's now dead. The sites was always on the expensive side and that hasn't chnaged so I highly recommend that you avoid joining because I fear you will be very disapointed.
|
12-01-12 11:04am
|
Reply
6
|
Rubber Eva
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
If it's a site we list, you're welcome to post a link to the site's listing page. Otherwise, you shouldn't be posting direct links to any sites.
If we don't list it but you feel it qualifies, feel free to drop us a line and we'll be happy to see if the site qualifies for a listing.
|
11-17-12 11:57am
|
Reply
7
|
Rubber Eva
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Ours is not a place for sharing free porn or links to free porn. It's not only tube sites.
|
11-17-12 11:28am
|
Reply
8
|
Rubber Eva
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Fetishkitsch I've actually noted before and it looks quite good if somewhat limited (one couple, all black clothing etc.). I think they used to have review page here too but I cannot find one anymore.
Fetish wear, latex, bondage, hardcore, that's what would do it. No stuff inserted into men's cocks, not pissing everywhere and all the time. I guess that is mostly DVD stuff and even then quite rare. Private used to do some good stuff back in their days under Pirate label unless time has really messed with my memory. Also Tanya Hyde, wonder if there's online site for her stuff? John Staglione's Fashionistas was quite nice too.
Thanks for the info Khan, you posted while I was typing ;)
|
11-17-12 10:16am
|
Reply
9
|
Rubber Eva
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
FWIW, fetishkitsch.com had us pull their listing because they were going to close the site.
And please don't post a link to a tube site again.
|
11-17-12 10:07am
|
Reply
10
|
Met Art
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Sorry, my mistake. I meant David Hamilton, not Peter Hamilton.
But David Hamilton has been accused of using under-age models, as well. But he used a soft-focus effect, which is a better term than a fuzzy effect. And Galitsin used the same kind of soft-focus effect in some of his photo shoots.
|
10-19-12 01:45pm
|
Reply
11
|
Met Art
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Some of Ronin's photo shoots are still at MetArt. But it's probably been 6 years or more since he's had any new work posted at MetArt.
I'm not aware of any shoots that are in his artsy style that were posted at MetArt in the last few years.
I think that in the early days of MetArt, they were more accepting of different styles of eroticism. At least in some of their offerings.
But since then, they have mainly focused on more mainstream, less artistic photography.
Let me rephrase that. The far-out artistic style were always, at most, a very minor part of the MetArt offerings. And now they are even less on view.
Even the fuzzy (not a very appropriate term) of Grigori Galitsin photo shoots, which I thought were somewhat artsy, are not in evidence at MetArt today. But Galitsin was a different case, where he was accused of using under-age models. So all of his photo shoots were removed from MetArt, I believe.
But I thought Galitsin's shoots had a certain artistic quality, sort of in the Peter Hamilton style, with a fuzzy (I'm not using the proper term to describe it) effect to the photos.
|
10-19-12 01:28pm
|
Reply
12
|
Clips 4 Sale
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks Ergo. No one upset here. I appreciate the dialog.
I went with the 95 because there is some great stuff here and i wanted to give credit to it (great in both quality, talent, and genre).
The trouble is there's also a lot of stuff that looks like it was ripped from a beta max in 1991 (Grainy encoding of 70s porn is disappointing).
To bottom line it: because there are individual producers having their work hosted at clips4sale there is a tremendous amount of variation. It's like I'm using a album reviewing website to comment about iTunes - it can be done but it's not designed to do it.
All the best-
|
08-01-12 04:54am
|
Reply
13
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from humiliatrix:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Not bots, I asked my sissies to post here since the older reviews expired.
Goddess Melissa
Humiliatrix.com
|
07-01-12 09:51am
|
Reply
14
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tboy:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I know what you mean, she's a stunning model and the photos are ace, some really, really nice shoots and very vibrant photos.
The wait is too long for any non-hardcore fan, I definitely wont bother.
Also they split up videos and photos into sub-sets, so the 6 pages of videos with 24 videos per page does not mean 144 videos, but rather 36.
They could do some really simple stuff to make this all far nicer:
1) Give new members access to 3k res pic sets for all sets released after they join
2) Don't split up the videos
3) Keep the points idea, 1 point a day and allow access to your choice of archive pic set at 3k res for every 3 points.
Tboy
|
06-28-12 09:52am
|
Reply
15
|
Bangbros Network
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for this. I'm not a big fan of VLC but I may use it so I can at least have proper audio in the one scene that I really wanted from this site.
|
06-24-12 08:32am
|
Reply
16
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tboy:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Heya,
Yeah I decided to go with membership regardless, I got enrolled on 'super' rank which is pretty much is what I wanted for the moment.
Toby
|
06-23-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
17
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from tboy:
Out of interest, does her site still have that recruit/super/ultra access thing that was mentioned a few years back? I'm keen to join but only if I can pick up all the content...
|
06-22-12 10:56am
|
Reply
18
|
Fetish Network
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Reply
19
|
Strapon Cum
(2)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from pat362:
Great review. I love the idea of lesbian strapon sex so a site like this is what I look for but this one is not really good. There is not a lot of content to begin with and the price is very high but I could overlook these things if what was available inside was in line to what I like. The models are all attractive and they are all well filmed but there is very little chemistry between the girls and too many of them can't properlly use a strapon and that's not very good in a site where strapon sex is the number one thing.
The fake cum does nothing for me but I can overlook it but I don't know if everyone else could.
|
06-07-12 06:59am
|
Reply
20
|
Strapon Cum
(2)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Lionheart:
I look forward for a review from you if you have the time. I love the free previews this site provides.
|
05-28-12 08:41pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from gaypornolover:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
To be fair ergo from a safer sex point of view, if she manages to stop it going in her eyes and her skin is unbroken, it's probably safer than intercourse without a condom, which seems to be standard in straight porn and still shocks me.
It is degrading I guess but no more than S&M type stuff.
|
05-26-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
22
|
Latex Heaven
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LatexRyan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
This site has no affiliation with either the old Latexotica or the new Latexotica. I don't know what the plan was, but I feel that this was an attempt to produce a spiritual successor to Latexotica (of course we now have a true successor with the re-opening later this year).
I personally never got the feeling that it was mass produced nor that it was generic. In fact I feel that it was as far flung from being mass-produced and generic as you can possibly get.
Latexotica was probably the first genuine multi-model latex site and after it's second revamp (the first being the change of name from Amateurlatex to Latexotica) it carved out a very specific niche, non-nude latex photography with a more adult edge, something which Latex Heaven has tried and - in my opinion - failed to do.
Latex Heaven feels far more mass produced than Latexotica ever was.
|
05-19-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
23
|
Rubber Tanja
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LatexRyan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I've seen it plastered all over certain forums and been pretty shocked at how much has been taken - I'm talking hundreds of posts and a fairly decent sized chunk of the site in terms of the videos.
True they have effectively dug their own graves by implementing DRM - of course this assumes that it is DRM we are talking about as the security measure (hardly likely to be anything else tbh) - but even if they do that, they'll still find content making it's way onto sharing sites because people will find ways to break the DRM encoding on the video.
A pity that a site with such potential has to resort to this sort of tactic, and thereby go and ruin any sort of chance they have of having a top notch site.
|
05-16-12 08:04am
|
Reply
24
|
Rubber Tanja
(1)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from LatexRyan:
Good review, I had a look at the front page and I have to say that it looks very clean and tidy that's easily navigated. This site looks promising and given the front page you would think that the site would deliver well on that front.
However as mentioned the site is young and maybe given a year or so the site can improve as the potential is there.
Glad to see that the webmaster has replied and has done so positively.
Will keep an eye on the site to see what happens.
EDIT: Or maybe I won't looks like DRM is going to be implemented due to "massive copyright infringements and illegal downloads"
It's a pity.
|
05-16-12 07:12am
|
Reply
25
|
Rubber Eva
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LatexRyan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
There are some decent scenes and Rubberdoll is hot, but she's prioritised her stage show to the detriment of her site that I feel it's not worth the money.
I find it odd that even though The Rubber Clinic is part of the RE Productions banner that the two sites do not have a similar layout, combining the best of both?
|
05-16-12 06:56am
|
