| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from williamj:
I had a Comcast issue as you can see from previous post. I now average 1.25MB or a bit higher in HD after local Comcast server crashed ( hope I didn't do that) now the downloads are excellent in relations to dowwnload speed. Great site.
|
01-28-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
52
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from williamj:
Today I'm getting 172KB I have to email them about slow speed.
|
01-24-09 01:47pm
|
Reply
53
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from uscue:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Good point, I may have not taken enough time with the search engine to fully appreciate it. I can definitely admit that. I might have to retry and then see. Only other thing I'll mention is VB's custom clip feature. I normally download full scenes but found that larger file sizes with a lot of time at the beginning spent on stuff I don't really care about much (some of the videos have interviews, acting and while I like it I can do without the fluffing BJ), I can just clip that out and have something I can easily enjoy at a smaller size. If I want to see the interview, I can always do the "Play Now" and watch it, but I don't need to keep it in my downloaded file.
One thing I didn't mention in my initial comment: I also love the editor's pick feature in American Vice. It personalizes the website, as does the review they give. I don't see a point in getting rid of it...either people like it and read it or they can just skip over it.
|
01-15-09 11:14am
|
Reply
54
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from moonbyrd:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Had to check this site out as it was mentioned as an alternative to Videobox in connection with the regional pricing and such.
I dislike the editorial comments. Didn't like them when Videobox had them, don't like them on American Vice. They seem overly smug and often quite vicious. (Videobox's current shoutbox system is not so hot either.)
As for video quality, based on a limited sample, Videobox seems to be better in terms of avoiding pixelation and artecacts. Neither is perfect. Videobox uses the original NTSC DVD pixel resolution of 720x480, American Vice resizes 4:3 video to 640x480. (What do they do with 16:9 videos?)
The good thing is AV lets people download a few scenes for free and also purchase individual movies/scenes as opposed to a all-you-can-eat membership. I'll certainly keep it in my bookmarks.
I don't care for the John Thompson Sexbox stuff at all but no one is forcing me to download it so I can ignore it.
|
01-15-09 01:13am
|
Reply
55
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply from Toadsith:
Btw, I just wanted to note, in message #4, I meant to say "they aren't jutting out..."
Also, more points about their site design, they have in fact just completely redesigned the site. I'm sort of mixed about it - it is easier to browse a scene, but a little more difficult to browse for a model after finding her in a scene. Still, these folks obviously care about the site design quite a bit, that is why the advertising really boggles me.
|
01-13-09 09:03pm
|
Reply
56
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from Wittyguy:
I was trolling for new sites to hit and found that 18yearsold (part of the network) is available along with 5 other sites for $18 on a TBP offer. The TBP stats say there are no hi rez pics so I was wondering if the hi rez pics you noted apply throughout the site (including 18yearsold) or just on some sites and roughly how far back in time the high rez pics go back to. Thanks.
|
01-13-09 03:24pm
|
Reply
57
|
White Ghetto
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Pornviewer:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thanks for your response. I think we have to agree to disagree. I found a number of very attractive women in White Ghetto, particularly the Squirt on Me POV series which I thought were very hot as the women were very much into the sex. Not every single woman was beautiful and in fact one of the girls who I thought was the hottest was in fact below average on the looks scale. But her repeated organism and enthusiasm more than made up the looks. The sets are very average and looked like rented a motel room which was fine with me. Somehow I find the sex and "perfect lighting" in the multimillion dollars homes a little too pretentious. I can imagine the “cut”, “cut”, “cut” going on behind the scenes while the models are touched up and the lightening just right.
Now for me, when I think of having sex with a woman, the lightening is subdued, candles perhaps. The brighter the light does provide more definition in the subject, less light offers a softer touch. But I agree with you, White Ghetto is not about high production values or high on photographic details. The set is often minimalist, background details are often ignored.
But bottom line for me, the sex is hot. I like the “girl next door” look. The models are typically amateur or pro/amateur.
|
12-29-08 09:57am
|
Reply
58
|
White Ghetto
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from Pornviewer:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Personally I like models that are less than perfect. I think the airbrushed, surgically enhanced, perfect lighting and heavily made-up models look artificial. I like variety in looks, average is okay if the sex is hot. Some sex scenes are burning hot with okay looking woman because you can tell they are into the sex and there organisms are not faked.
BTW there are many beautiful women on the Rocco Siffredi site which is now included.
Again, I’m not saying you are wrong in your opinion. I am just offering a different perspective.
|
12-27-08 04:47pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Yes, Hulu rocks!
|
12-23-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
60
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tobi:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hi, the pics are 1100 x 740. I also forgot to mention that you can use download managers (my free download manager works fine)
There is also no download limit.
|
12-07-08 07:03am
|
Reply
61
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Blah! Well this blah not meant against you of course :-)
It's so damn' easy to make the collector happy and still some companies don't get it. O.k. at least it's now one ZIP per set which is a real improvement.
|
12-06-08 03:07am
|
Reply
62
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Lionheart:
I asked for the website to added to PU's list, but I haven't seen any reviews for this site yet, but I saw some sample videos from the site and they look pretty good. I'm planing to join the site in the near the future.
|
12-05-08 02:16am
|
Reply
63
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Wittyguy:
Actually, I saw some previews on a tgp post a while back and took a gander at but didn't sign up in large part due to the lack of TBP/PU reviews. The only thing I could ever find resembling a review, and I can't till if it's a schill or not, is here: http://www.free-handjobs.com/reviews/amateurfacialsuk/ . Sorry can't be of more help.
|
12-04-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
64
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from RipRap:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Toadsmith,
You are very welcome.
I am open to criticism and try to look at things from all POV.
I'll be busy doing lots of GGG, so it may take awhile to add new reviews, but I am sure you understand that there is a LOT of HARD WORK to do.
|
12-03-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
65
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Lionheart:
sweet now I can finally give this site a try
|
11-30-08 01:22am
|
Reply
66
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from RipRap:
Not to be a prick, but even your review states DRM as a negative.
I understand it was almost a year ago, but I stated that my review was based on being a FORMER member.
I updated my review because of your comments, so I respect your opinion. Whether I can respect GGG again remains to be seen.
Keep on DLing.....
|
11-29-08 10:24pm
|
Reply
67
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RipRap:
(Toadsith's Reply)
That was only 2 days ago. Plus, I do not take the word of any site that has used DRM in the past.
Once VERIFIED by myself, my wife and other PU dot cum members, I will Re-Review GGG.
DRM is WRONG. Shame on them for using it in the first place.
If they truly removed ALL of their DRM, I am sure the reviews will reflect that.
http://www.info-mech.com/drm_flaws.html
|
11-29-08 10:15pm
|
Reply
68
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from RipRap:
I have updated my review and noted that they are reported as DRM free as of 3 days ago.
I will believe it when I see it.
By that I mean once I check EVERY SINGLE Video offered for DL by GGG.
Once bitten twice shy.........
Better safe than sorry.........
|
11-29-08 10:03pm
|
Reply
69
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from lk2fireone:
What review are you talking about? Please be more specific. Lol.
I found the review of German Goo Girls by RipRap to be very original in its use of the Cons section. Wish I had the brains and artistry some of these PU posters have.
I vote "No" on DRM, as well.
I think RipRap was emotionally scarred by his DRM experience, which I can understand.
|
11-29-08 07:31pm
|
Reply
70
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from jd1961:
You're right, I took the search engine for a spin and it works great!
|
11-29-08 06:29pm
|
Reply
71
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
He's right, you should edit that out.
We need to applaud sites that drop the evil DRM.
|
11-29-08 05:56pm
|
Reply
72
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from jd1961:
This site seems to be obtaining sites from other companies and improving on them.
|
11-28-08 05:13am
|
Reply
73
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I know what you mean. There aren't a whole lot of "huge" Japanese photos yet for some reason, Vanilla H comes to mind.
|
11-28-08 05:09am
|
Reply
74
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Generally 1280px, but I'm seeing newer sets at 1537.
|
11-26-08 09:49pm
|
Reply
75
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I agree about the good review but 164 uncensored videos out of 1000 doesn't sound that great to me. I hate those pictures and movies where all the good bits are blurred and pixelated.
|
11-26-08 02:22pm
|
