| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
It's hard to tell if you would like the bulk of their content. If you aren't dead set on HD then you might go ahead but you should definetely avoid if you need HD. There is simply not enough HD on the entire network to warrant the join price.
|
05-22-12 10:20am
|
Reply
27
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from dieselman:
Hey guys! Like always, it took a bit more time. The alpha version was not up to my expectations so I sent it back for improvements. I think, it will be released during this week, my best guess it will be Tuesday or Wednesday but again, something may go wrong!
Thank you for your interest!
|
03-03-13 08:08am
|
Reply
28
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Dracula:
(elephant's Reply)
That $69 is a one time charge, but I agree, it's a lot of money.
|
03-03-13 06:37am
|
Reply
29
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Dracula:
Here's the latest promo from Diesel ...
We were thinking how to REWARD our loyal members....
Here is the deal!
Stay with us for two months and get all these sites without any additional charge!
Or upgrade for ONE TIME fee of $69 right away and access, without any delay,
40 exclusive teen scenes per week RIGHT NOW!
ACCESS ALL SITES NOW (Or wait 59 days)
|
03-02-13 08:20pm
|
Reply
30
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from luv lickn clit:
Your eyes didn't deceive you elephant, but it still apparently hasn't happened yet. Maybe Dieselman will chime in.
|
02-23-13 05:51pm
|
Reply
31
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I disagree (but really agree with your intention) with one point you make, namely that the sites are so similar. I don't think they're similar - they're really the same site just cut up into three separate pieces with no common theme. I could see if they grouped models, or put all anal on one site. But it seems like they just randomly choose where to upload each new scene. That adds to the frustration.
I really hope the webmaster rethinks his approach.
|
02-01-13 03:58pm
|
Reply
32
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I agree with you that their business model may actually be hurting them. I LOVE these sites but I haven't been back to any of them because as much as I love them they aren't a good value. And, as you say, they change so often that I don't have as much confidence that I'm getting what I think I'm getting.
To make matters worse, the way they spread scenes across all the sites is a problem. There are several models I really like but just joining one site means I don't get access to all their stuff. Even with Gloria, who is one of my favourites, I can get the bonus site that features her (Skinny Super Girl) but then there is so much more on the other sites that I don't get. Like you, I find it so frustrating that so far my approach has just been to avoid it.
|
02-01-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
33
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I really hope the site rethinks this and bundles a better package. I realize that the access and price they used to give us was probably too good to last, but the current structure can't help them either. I wouldn't give it a second thought except that they make some of the best porn available today.
|
01-31-13 03:59pm
|
Reply
34
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from slutty:
They have done this before, when I joined a couple of years ago, they had the same setup. I would just wait around until they switch it back to giving network access. If they never do that, I probably wont be rejoining as often. I wonder if they are trying to make younglegal more of a standalone, as only 18only seems to be offered as a bonus to any of the individual sites.
|
09-16-12 09:53pm
|
Reply
35
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Goldfish:
(elephant's Reply)
I agree. I recall finding the content wasn't totally exclusive between the sites so needing to join each individually wouldn't be worth it to me.
Wasn't network access $39 a month earlier this year? I don't think it was ever $29 for the whole network.
UPDATE: If you scroll down to my last review you'll see in the "Cons" that I mention network access was expensive at $34.97 a month.
|
09-16-12 07:32am
|
Reply
36
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I hope this isn't the case. This is an amazing network that I'll continue to rejoin, but if it gets confusing or loses value I probably won't bother.
|
09-16-12 06:59am
|
Reply
37
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Goldfish:
I've had a beef with this network since I found them a few years ago. They are always tinkering with the network access levels. At least with the one site now there is a good amount of content to make it worth a subscription.
|
09-16-12 06:41am
|
Reply
38
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from tangub:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for the extra info elephant. It sounds like i'll be better off delaying a join here for a while until the amount of new better quality stuff has grown a bit especially with a price tag of $30...if it was $20 i'd be more inclined to take a chance on it but its definately a site to keep an eye on.
|
09-19-11 07:32am
|
Reply
39
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for the review and heads up on this one, elephant...
It certainly seems like the site has grown a lot better since I gave it a 65...in January 2010.
The material, the quality seems to have improved a lot since then - the vids quality, too.
Still, I'm not crazy about the Co. - from Holland. The price first and then the fact that some of their site have the same content. They ought to come up with a general network deal - not that it'll make much difference according to the content of their 14 sites listed - but a network price would be fair (it's not cheap):
http://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
|
09-19-11 06:43am
|
Reply
40
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from tangub:
I was looking at the tour here the other day and yes i agree that Stasha is a real cutie and almost had me reaching for my credit card but being a photo fan and having read some of the other reviews for this site i have a feeling i would be left feeling disappointed with the size and quality of the photos here.
|
09-18-11 03:29pm
|
Reply
41
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from messmer:
Good review, elephant! It tempted me to take a look at this site. Very impressive. One very strong plus for me would be their rate of update!
|
09-18-11 10:24am
|
Reply
42
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from rearadmiral:
This looks like a great site. I'm not normally into these kinds of sites but I have had memberships to a few. This looks like one that I'll add to my list of future memberships. Thanks for the review.
|
09-18-11 06:00am
|
Reply
43
|
18 Only Girls
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from slutty:
(elephant's Reply)
you are right that recently a lot of the more attractive newer girls are only doing photosets. But, hopefully that will change.
the sites that are still updating are:
younglegalporn
18onlygirls
alicewonderbang
natashashy
vikanymph
beataporn
sashablonde
ivanafukalot
|
12-10-10 09:43am
|
Reply
44
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from dracken:
As far as I understand this site has a lot of problems with password thieves. Your account might have been hacked and then shared. I am always suspicious of this happening and I know many porn websites don't take as much care as they should regarding multiple ip log-ins. I always use different passwords for each site I sign-up for and I always make sure that no one else is using my log-in illegally.
Have you tried contacting customer support regarding poor bandwidth?
|
08-05-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
45
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
You have no problem with your connection it is slow. They have no zip files, and every time I would download a photo, the whole page would load again slowly. It was very frustrating. Needs improvement.
|
01-25-08 09:38am
|
Reply
46
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Hey, thanks a bunch! It's nice having the Kacey "buffet" all in one place. Much appreciated!
|
01-20-08 02:07pm
|
Reply
47
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Well, you might be interested in her on StuffedPetite, which I just did a review of. It's some of the most prolonged belly flat fucking I've seen anywhere, on a bed, on a couch, and then at the bed edge. There's a good 4 and a half minutes of it, all told, in concentrated form.
Kacey also has a cute face and a sexy mouth.
|
01-20-08 04:02am
|
Reply
48
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
I agree, they're not unwatchable, and if the vid really gets to me, the dimensions matter less. I would like sites these days to do at least 640x480, but as Mick Jagger once said ...
|
01-20-08 03:36am
|
Reply
49
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for the add'l info. The info you get on hovering are the dimensions of the vids and the bitrate. Those dimensions are small and certainly not up to current baseline standards, IMHO. 640x480 or near that is as small as I can take.
|
01-20-08 03:22am
|
Reply
50
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
On google, I found a sign up page for Playboy Cyber Club with this billing company. I found it on a search. When I did a mock sign up with PCC, I didn't get this billing company. However, when I did a fraud check on the local billing Playboy sign up page, it did show it as "trusted" and secure. Well...good night !!
|
01-20-08 02:56am
|
