Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : messmer (137)  

Feedback:   All (2160)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (1847)

Other:   Replies Received (1284)  |   Trust Ratings (77)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 1284 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit JAV HD

JAV HD
(1)
Reply of messmer's Review from otoh:

Hi messmer - good review as always! I loosely plan to subscribe to a Japanese site sometime - but I suspect you are right in saying that this may not be under Japanese control, due to the uncensored content - there is probably more original content in sites that show censored content.

If you are after more mature Japanese girls, then DTI has one, I think - among many others (a couple are listed here such as 1pondo.tv and Caribbean com), I think it is Paco Paco Mama. May be worth you asking for it to be listed here.


04-28-13  02:42pm

Reply
52
Visit JAV HD

JAV HD
(1)
REPLY TO #6 from tboy: (messmer's Reply)

I'm pretty sure all 3 sites I mentioned are 100% pixellated, there has been a movement over the past 5 to 10 years though of these 'super fine mosaic' films which are still pixellated but not so brutally.

I'd say it's something that you have to come to terms with if you want to join in with main stream Japanese porn, I barely notice it now to be honest.

I suppose also that's one aspect of Japanese porn where innovation does actually thrive, you can see a lot of the weirdness of Japanese porn stems from not being able to show genitalia.

The best I saw were pants made out of some kind of elastane/lycra material which had cock glove of sorts, so it get's past the censors because technically you can't see the flesh and the woman just sucks the 'penis like shape', no pixellation.

Maybe they wont ever fully de-censor to ensure they are being seen to uphold their moral standards, but I can imagine them introducing a 'ultra-super fine mosaic' which is essentially a 1x1 pixel filter :)

Toby


04-28-13  09:59am

Reply
53
Visit JAV HD

JAV HD
(1)
Reply of messmer's Comment from tboy:

I'd suggest you give Action JAV, Asia Movie Pass or JSex Network a go if you want to find something a bit more interesting.

Action JAV and AMP both have pretty good category breakdowns easily visible without joining so you can see what you're getting.

With Jsex I recommend just clicking on New Stuff and reading through the names of all the files so get a taste.

You might generally be disappointing though, Japanese porn isn't terribly innovative, it's only weird because it's different but then that difference becomes all very samey quite quickly.

Be sure to check out that bandage-porn ;)

Toby


04-28-13  09:20am

Reply
54
Visit JAV HD

JAV HD
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from Khan: (messmer's Reply)

That is odd. I'll assume Epoch didn't have any explanation of why the signup page didn't work.

Anyway, at least you found a way to sign up for the site.


04-28-13  07:23am

Reply
55
Visit JAV HD

JAV HD
(1)
Reply of messmer's Comment from Khan:

Perhaps I'm missing something but despite your remark, "(see comment below)" ... I didn't see any explanation (in your comment) of why signing up through us didn't work for you.

04-27-13  02:53pm

Reply
56
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Capn: (messmer's Reply)

Well, I can only speak from my own perspective.

I never print photos out, so as long as I can get a crisp full image on screen I am happy.

I am not that bothered about 'zooming in' to the nth degree.

Cap'n. 8)


04-16-13  03:07pm

Reply
57
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (messmer's Reply)

I figured it was the lawyers who recommend that.

But actually, to enter the PU web site, or to become a member, you also have to "state" or agree that you are of legal age, explicit material does not offend you, etc.

Just the way you have to operate, with the laws you need to be careful.
I went to see a dentist, had to sign an agreement that any disputes would be settled by arbitration (instead of in court), and that each dentist had their own separate practice, that you can't sue or arbitrate against all the dentists in the office or practice, just your own personal dentist.

We need to have are own personal lawyer with us, whenever we see a dentist, go to the hospital, etc., to be sure we are not giving up our legal rights.


04-10-13  01:25pm

Reply
58
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from The Bishop: (messmer's Reply)

messmer,

Sorry old chap if I was a bit direct, but I felt what you said was way off the mark!

Well one thing I'm completely in agreement with you (and it's something I raise on the N&H forum) slow strips - any set that goes to the pussy quick, or for that matter doesn't at least tease I find a bit too direct. Though of course not all sets can be classics, the day of the shoot the model may be off or several other factors going on.
Anyway, letís not get sidetracked on this.

I still donít see where youíre coming from with the hairy legs (Iím not a fan either but I guess it is natural &#61514; - there has been an increase of late Ė and this has tended to be returning modelsí Ė but not so much as to take over the content as you suggest.

Jennifer for example (if youíve looked in recently) is simply gorgeous, Sadie Mathews (returning model) Sophia Delane, Amber Lustfull, Crystal and Melissa (another returning model) Ė at the time of writing these are all Ďliveí models and without hair on their legs!

With regard to what you call ďhomemade tattoosĒ Ė Iíve little concept of what you mean (unless you refer to the quality) as I always thought tats were carried out at Tattoo Parlours. A lot of the British modelsí (younger ones) Iíll agree have them Ė but itís entered the mainstream in someways and we have it like it or not. My preference is, if the model is good Iím not going to let a few tats ruin it for me Ė though I know from the comments section Ė some posters seem to think they own the model. It starts all sorts of comments some mildly unpleasant to worse (from a few of the usual suspects).

Iím finding N&H better than ever before, there was a time where there used to be lean periods but thatís stopped completely now, there is new models coming at a steady pace Ė though here I am biased as I like Sean Rís dedication to big sets with great clarity the best.
Iím sorry youíre jaded with it all, itís a shame I imagine, if you canít find your particular niche.
I wish you good luck finding something out there!

BTW, have you looked at satinplay ?

I havenít but it might be of interest, lots of lingerie though I think the models are shaven (not good for me!)
All the best,
Bish


03-22-13  05:17pm

Reply
59
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)
REPLY TO #2 from The Bishop: (messmer's Reply)

That's bollocks.

I've been a member a long time and no way is N&H going as you put it to the 'gross out' crowd, not a bit of it.

I'd say the opposite, the site's producing some lovely sets of gorgeous women (there is the harier content for those that want that i.e. legs) but that content is the minority. There is more than enough of other content to keep one happy.

The site has gone to high-res two years ago and their top photographers produce stuff in stunning clarity.

The model you refer to I've no idea which one you mean. There is certainly more ladies with tattoos, but that's reflecting the current trend (in Britain anyway) of getting tats.

Not everyone like this nor I'm not a total fan but get with the times.

Bishop


03-22-13  01:49pm

Reply
60
Visit Sex See

Sex See
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment from Khan:

The sites are back up now. Must have been a short term thing.

BTW, if either of you feel/find that there is wrong info in the TBP listing, then you'll want to submit an error report so the editors can check it out.


03-20-13  06:41am

Reply
61
Visit Sex See

Sex See
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from slutty: (messmer's Reply)

I saw the reviewer said that, I was just pointing out the site says the opposite (unlimited downloads) on both the main screen and the join page. Just thought it was funny that it said something different from a 3 day old TBP review - I would be inclined to trust the review over the site, and thus it is most likely pretty horrible false advertising.

03-20-13  01:19am

Reply
62
Visit Sex See

Sex See
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment from slutty:

Their site is up and it says "unlimited downloads", false advertising perhaps, it would seem odd if they changed their policy 3 days after a TBP review...

03-19-13  11:11pm

Reply
63
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from lk2fireone: (messmer's Reply)

i also used XNews. But it stopped updating years ago. And now, to use SSL, you have to use some other program with it. And it's for 32-bit computers, and mine is a 64-bit. And there are other reasons it's outdated.

So I have been playing around with some newreaders, but none are as simple as XNews was.

NewFlash Plus is free, easy to use. But when you download a file, for example, a JPG file, it opens an instance of the file, as well as downloads it.

I have an anti-virus program, Norton Internet Security, but if the files open at the same time that they download, then I think that is a security risk.

I want to download files, scan them for malware, BEFORE I open them.

That's what I do, even from sites I trust, like my paid pornsites: Metart, Diesel Access network, TMW, whatever.

I read years back you can use a stenography program and encode a virus inside a picture of any extension. Jpeg, jpg, bmp, etc.

By "you", I don't mean me and you, but someone who has hacking skills.


03-19-13  08:23pm

Reply
64
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from lk2fireone: (messmer's Reply)

Thanks.

It's been years since I was a newsgroup member. So I have to re-learn how to use them.

The main thing I have to worry about is catching a virus or other malware.

But I need a newsgroup reader that's easy to use.

And some other things, to make it easy to use.


03-19-13  03:12pm

Reply
65
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from critic: (messmer's Reply)

In this case I meant 'naturalistic' in that the women should act naturally, not as if they'd been instructed to fake their pleasure.

03-14-13  11:17am

Reply
66
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Cybertoad: (messmer's Reply)

I think many of us share and apartment here LOL

03-11-13  07:30am

Reply
67
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
REPLY TO #6 from rearadmiral: (messmer's Reply)

It sounds like you and I are on the same path - now that we've taken the plunge into HD there is no going back.

I agree that if your tastes are for mature women this isn't the site for you as a frequent rejoin or as a long-term member: the updates you're interested in just aren't that frequent and they are rarely in HD. You're right though that my tastes make this a better deal. But the reality of porn is that my tastes are just better served by the market anyway. I do have a few niches that aren't well served so I can empathize with you in your search for good quality porn with mature models even if I don't share that specific interest.


03-09-13  04:52am

Reply
68
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (messmer's Reply)

I completely agree with you. I've rarely had to deal with webmasters
but if they start to use every possible excuse to justify what I consider to be bad business decisions or practices and/or treat me like some piece of crap then they can kiss my money goodbye because I will never spend another penny on any of their products.


03-08-13  08:22am

Reply
69
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (messmer's Reply)

Thanks for the comments - and for correcting my error. They do upload 5 videos per day. I agree that if you have a specific niche you like you're better off going to sites that cater to that niche rather than relying on VB. The lack of anything above 640x480 on 80% of the uploads is a real drawback.

03-07-13  01:21pm

Reply
70
Visit Dominated Girls

Dominated Girls
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (messmer's Reply)

I agree 100% that interviews at the end are better, but the reason I prefer them there is I like to hear the model's perspective on the actual scene rather than hear about her theoretical likes and dislikes beforehand.

I'm okay with how they do the bondage and torment, but like you, I do wish they'd build in more humiliation and public scenes.

Thanks for the comments! It's good to hear from another BDSM fan.


03-05-13  01:40pm

Reply
71
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from Abel Semen: (messmer's Reply)

Yes, as I said, they only go back a few months.

03-02-13  04:12pm

Reply
72
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
REPLY TO #4 from Dracula: (messmer's Reply)

That's very possible. I don't download movies, but instead stream them through my Roku device. With the Roku, it's clean, at least from what I've seen. I haven't tried any other methods to download their movies. Thanks for your input!

03-01-13  03:10pm

Reply
73
N/A REPLY TO #16 from Monahan: (messmer's Reply)

Ditto.

Captcha make no sense at all and all that the assignment of a random p/w and user name serves no real benefit to the site.


02-20-13  11:52pm

Reply
74
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Cybertoad: (messmer's Reply)



My thoughts exactly !


02-20-13  08:29am

Reply
75
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)
Reply of messmer's Comment from Capn:

So what happened to quote:

ATK 100% NATURAL BREASTS AND UNSHAVED PUSSIES!

No mention of hairy armpits, asses or legs there that I can see!

Cap'n. :0E


02-15-13  04:56pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 1284 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.56 seconds.