Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (328)  

Feedback:   All (1757)  |   Reviews (134)  |   Comments (117)  |   Replies (1506)

Other:   Replies Received (993)  |   Trust Ratings (70)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 993 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

I'm passing on some very important info to the right people upstairs, RA, about lookin' into providing you with a much deserved reciprocal Company retirement package.
Yep! you heard me right!

The unstoppable flow of your numerous, comprehensively reviewed sites, courted by an unmatched editorial quality born of each review, that would be the envy of any noted, local news pundit serving on any paper within the U-S-of-A ......

I figure your notoriously proven power of sway, guiding judgment, and directing fellow members in the right direction, not to mention the blood-sweat-an-tears that went into each effort on your part.... all of which, adding up to awarding you at least equal monetary allotment.... with and among which the whole being shared by our PU founders, their loyal, time-honored and presently entrenched staff.


04-29-14  02:41am

Reply
52
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

It's not exactly artcore or glamcore. Imagine the format that you're used to for g/g content on ALS, then make it b/g. No condoms, last time I checked!

By the way, I should amend my review in one way. Their latest photosets have increased in resolution to 5000x3000. They have always been the first to adopt the highest resolution formats, and they are making good on that tradition.


04-23-14  05:56pm

Reply
53
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

C'mon, RA ..... lighten up. I'm running out of superlatives with which to cap the anointing praise consistent with your unending display of journalistic talents.

My God, man! ......get some sleep.


04-20-14  07:36am

Reply
54
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Marcus:

Thanks for such a great review, and for addressing the elephant in the room (ie, the upsells). Honestly, as amazing as the site is, and even bearing in mind your recommendations, it's still not worth the risk for me. All it would take for me to think again would be for a 'you will be billed extra for this - are you sure' popup to appear.

04-19-14  10:15am

Reply
55
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from jook:

Thanks as always for a thorough review.

Maybe I need an internet lesson. My experience has been horrible (I'm in my 1st week and basically gave up). First, I was double charged. I was taken to epoch where my card was rejected in a microsecond. I was then brought to a secondary processor where I had no problem. That is, except that I got charged by epoch also. I thought I was joining the site Latina rampage. At least that's what I clicked. . After joining, I saw no reference to this site. My only option was bangbros, which I hate. Tattooed warriors, not my style. I couldn't get any other site without being asked for another $29. I have to think I'm doing something wrong but have no idea what. And I'd rather forego the dough rather than spend hours emailing and trying to figure it out. Does Latina rampage even exist?


04-18-14  12:46pm

Reply
56
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment from rearadmiral:

I should add, in the interest of fairness, that my email received a response that was quick and effective. My advice to anyone joining an add-on here is to keep you joining email for any information you may need to cancel. I did, and though that didn't work I suspect that having all that information to provide in an email helped out.

04-17-14  04:35pm

Reply
57
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Monahan:

Agree with the Squirrel, RA. Another great review.

My only addition is that I use Firefox as my browser and had frequent problems signing on. The unstated limits seemed to arrive even on the first or second D/L. When I had Firefox access issues I could access with IE immediately but couldn't download anything. I also don't like having to switch browsers.

RK's support provided no he;p fixing the issue so I just decided to quit trying. There are plenty of other great sites so fighting to access what I've paid for just ain't worth the frustration.


04-10-14  11:29pm

Reply
58
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from TheSquirrel:

Another great review admiral, and good investigation into the very cloudy download limit situation. Most if us hate download limits, but they're even worse when you're unclear what the download limit is.

04-10-14  08:53am

Reply
59
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Loki: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.

It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.


04-09-14  11:04pm

Reply
60
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

The first time I went to the tour site using the PU link the price was $29.95. I logged out and did something else. I went back a few minutes later, spent more time checking out the talent, then decided to move on. As I was exiting the tour site a pop up offered me was $23.95, 20% off the $23.95. I visited the tour site twice...so maybe they felt I was close to signing up and needed an extra nudge.

Whatever, I decided not to join the site.


04-06-14  11:59am

Reply
61
Visit Industry Invaders

Industry Invaders
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Divinx: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Those that rip off whole sites, know well how to get the movies, no matter what the site owner may try against it. So they are not going to chase away pirates, but are chasing away potential paying customers.

04-04-14  04:32am

Reply
62
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from Marcus: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I agree - I'm never going to join Bangbrothers because of their shady practices, and I don't see why tricking those who do is a good business plan because they're hardly encouraging loyalty.

04-01-14  11:34pm

Reply
63
Visit Hard X

Hard X
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from EverNight:

Thanks for the review

03-31-14  10:42am

Reply
64
Visit Hard X

Hard X
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from TheSquirrel:

Another excellent review. I wasn't aware of this one until I saw your forum post. Question is - will it grow? If they update it looks to be a great site, with professionally shot material, and one that appeals to my taste. Nice find admiral.

03-30-14  05:19pm

Reply
65
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
REPLY TO #3 from Divinx: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I suffered their nasty practices myself. Seems like some cookie retained my credit card info, and upon entering a site, just clicking on an image would suscribe me to it, WITHOUT ASKING FIRST.

Even worse, there are clones, and you can get suscribed to both clones.

Even worse, depending on how you got there, you'll have also a different route out of the whole mess. Each clone can have its own way.

I got the content I wanted, managed to cancel with pain and efforts, and when surfing for porn I immediately close any page that reminds me of Bangbros -just in case.

Compare this with Reality Kings. Looks like they also have some cookie, because they offer me resuscribing to its sites when I enter any of them. But they offer a limited preview, and do not suscribe you without asking you first -so far, at least...


03-29-14  11:02am

Reply
66
N/A REPLY TO #16 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

lol -- I thought you'd like that concept.

03-27-14  03:07pm

Reply
67
N/A REPLY TO #14 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yeppers! I've seen one where some girls head was inserted.

03-26-14  03:07pm

Reply
68
Visit Wired Pussy

Wired Pussy
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from turboshaft:

Great review, rearadmiral!

Can't say I'm a fan of this niche, as it seems to be more about what someone is feeling than can ever really be shown in porn, but Kink has always piqued my curiosity to say the least. And the now dormant Pissing.com made some lovably deviant material in its time.

They do seem to be in love with longer scene lengths on other sites, so maybe that's the reason behind "the lack of 1920x1080." I assume that's the case with this site as well, because you just don't want a 1080i download of an hour-plus long scene.


03-23-14  03:33pm

Reply
69
N/A REPLY TO #12 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well, as I think I said, I would not join such a site if it didn't provide me a lot of content in my main niche. One could join dirtygardengirl.com if one were really interested because that is all they do.

03-23-14  07:03am

Reply
70
N/A REPLY TO #9 from YankeeBastard: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Got nothing against British people I just can't stand the pompous accent, total turnoff. Like nails on a chalkboard to me.

03-22-14  07:29pm

Reply
71
N/A REPLY TO #10 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yes but screw them. I know there are a lot things that are included in porn that will turn someone off. When the heat gets turned up I get turned off.

"Don't feed the trolls"

Certainly there can be no argument in regards to this because whatever floats your boat so be it. Yes, there are several illegal acts (kids, bestiality) though I'm sure there are people who would argue for it. Nonetheless I try not to be judgmental on such matters, though if I knew someone who oversteped those bounds with kids, I would call the cops on them.


03-21-14  04:54pm

Reply
72
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from EverNight: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I agree with you as well. As for the numeric score I can understand why someone would score it much higher. I gave it 80 because I would recommend the site, but my personal experience with it was so-so. But each person's experience is subjective and will be different so that's why it's good there are multiple reviews. If everything was completely fact/stat based there'd be little reason for more than 1 review of anything.

03-14-14  04:07pm

Reply
73
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto what RA said. One thing not mentioned, however, is that many scenes start off very well but go on way too long. A scene can start with the model lying in bed fingering herself. 10 minutes later nothing has changed except that the model may have shifted her position a little.

Another is that all material is in segments requiring many updates. That can be good, however, because if a scene is boring or not very interesting, you can skip it altogether and not download it.

One plus is that several porn chicks got there start on FTV and it's fun watching them do their thing while looking fresh and new.


03-13-14  11:06pm

Reply
74
Visit Gloryhole Swallow

Gloryhole Swallow
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from joekramer08:

Nice review. I joined this site a while ago, but I never got around to putting up a review on here. I agree with your assessment - the realness of the scenes is what makes this site unique - the girls look and feel like real amateur girls - they don't come off as pornstars (though there are 1 or 2 porn girls on here, like Proxy Paige)...but for the most part, the girls on this site appear to be real amateurs, and that is what drew me to the site. A girl on this site named Tiffany was one of my personal favorites - not super attractive, but cute and full figured - she just seemed like a real girl you'd pass on the street who likes to get kinky on the side. You could tell she loved sucking dick and was very sensual with her technique.

Due to the fact that these girls appear to be amateurs, the quality of the scenes can vary depending on the oral skills of the girl...but when you come upon a girl on this site who's really horny and into it, and she has good oral technique, it's super hot - and I'd say there are enough of the hot scenes here to make it worth joining.


03-13-14  08:36am

Reply
75
Visit Seymore Butts

Seymore Butts
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks for the info but I wasn't planning on joining this site only because if I were to join an SB site then I'd only do so if it had all of his movies. I don't know if he owns this one but it's quite possible that he doesn't own all of his movies anymore. He may have sold the rights in the past so no one will be able to release them all.

03-11-14  06:00pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 993 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.14 seconds.