Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : MargulisAZ (84)  

Feedback:   All (330)  |   Reviews (47)  |   Comments (85)  |   Replies (198)

Other:   Replies Received (199)  |   Trust Ratings (45)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 199 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (MargulisAZ's Reply)

Looks like corporate-style conformity is winning the day in the Met-Art empire.

I used to like the way photos were named at Errotica-Archives (one of the subject feifdoms): an "m" was tacked onto the end if it was "medium" size, and an "l" or and "e" if it was, respectively, "large" or "extra-large."

But now, as so often happens in times imperial, a singular convention has prevailed, so if I want to mix medium- and large-sized pictures in file number order, I can't just chuck out an "m" and put the "l" in its place, now that those attributes have to appear before the file number.

Petty, I know. But only if you're a fan of the content ... and there's plenty of that.


09-06-14  11:02am

Reply
2
Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from djrc2012:

AS LONG AS IT ISN'T POV THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS BAD CAMERA WORK! SITE'S CAMERA WORK IS DECENT GIVIN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.ALSO NO ONE WANTS TO SEE 20 MINUTE PUSSY ACTION CLOSE UP SHOTS.IF YOU WANT THAT HEAD TO BANGBROS OR ELEGANT ANGEL.AS LONG AS THE GIRLS STAY SMOKING MONOTONY DOESNT MATTER.QUALITY OF THE GIRLS IS WHAT MAKES THIS OUTSTANDING SITE STAND OUT.IF YOU WANT DIFFERENT SCENERY OR A PLOT GO TO SWEETSINNER.COM

08-11-13  10:44am

Reply
3
Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from pat362:

Truer words were never said. It's mind blogging to think that this guy is able to hire such amazingly cute girls willing to do hardcore porn and he has been doing this for a few years and he still can't shoot the porn in any way that can be considered decent.

I tried the site twice and I think I was more pissed the second time than the first because the guy actually managed to do a worse job in the more recent shoots than he did in past ones. I know that all the shots avoid showing the male performers face(not sure why) so that really limits the possible angles but it still doesn't explain the piss poor camera work done by the camera operator.


07-18-13  06:41pm

Reply
4
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from Marcus:

Christ on a bike, that's a woeful policy.

Surely the best way of getting people to return to a site is to keep them engaged, keep them on the site and maintain their excitement. I'd never join a site with such a unrealistic download cap, let alone one that actually LIES on the preview pages like that.


07-17-13  11:21pm

Reply
5
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

Joke is a major understatement.
Is there any mention of that policy in their terms of service?


07-17-13  11:19pm

Reply
6
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from TheSquirrel:

I was a subscriber about three years ago, but would never return because of this policy. They will kill themselves (hopefully).

07-17-13  11:29am

Reply
7
Visit Brutal Fisting

Brutal Fisting
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from Addict:

They do seem to update but it is rare. Looks to be avg a scene a month if you are lucky.

Last 10 update dates
15.01.2013
08.11.2012
08.10.2012
08.09.2012
11.08.2012
23.07.2012
30.05.2012
28.04.2012
10.04.2012
26.03.2012


01-19-13  12:25pm

Reply
8
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from luv lickn clit:

Marqulis, any guess as to what percent of the most recent stuff looks non-exclusive? I've been a member at both sites, both over 2 years ago. I prefered Sapphic Erotica. There was too much anal at Lez Cuties for my liking--no doubt they were jumping on the anal bandwagon that has worked its way into most porn. I'd rather see the girls making out and licking each others pussies. I liked how most of the girls at both sites really seemed to be into girls and appeared to enjoy making their videos--Sapphic Erotica had the edge with this. Last time I checked the free tour, Sapphic Errotica had a lot of new scenes I wanted to download--that was at least 6 months ago. If a lot of new content is not in the original Sapphic Erotica style that would be a bummer.

01-17-13  04:56am

Reply
9
Visit Teach Me Fisting

Teach Me Fisting
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from RustyJ:

Too bad the network is split and this one's on Sextreme side.

01-10-13  06:04am

Reply
10
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(2)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from manholelover:

Obviously, i'm more into the male cams, but Cam4.com is the cam site I keep returning to. Although some models (and they're mainly women) will only do stuff for tips, the vast majority, certainly of men, are amateurs who will perform for free. Anyone who visits this site will see action without having to pay. Of course, for that 1-1 experience, then tipping is recommended.

08-06-11  11:39am

Reply
11
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(2)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from lk2fireone:

It's been many, many years since I've been to a topless bar. But it seems like it would be cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private cam show.

08-05-11  01:10am

Reply
12
Visit Hush Pass

Hush Pass
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from Jay G:

Shady! You made me think twice about this site. Thanks!

06-18-11  09:41am

Reply
13
Visit UK Amateur Vids

UK Amateur Vids
(0)
REPLY TO #13 from dougie: (MargulisAZ's Reply)

Think what you like! The site is worth double the membership just for the REAL Glory Hole videos, there isn’t another site on the net that has proper real Glory Hold videos filmed in a genuine Gents toilet, ALL other sites are just fake Glory Holes filmed in studios

04-30-11  10:00am

Reply
14
Visit French-e-Girls

French-e-Girls
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from mr jam:



Thanks for the heads up. You only have to look at the basic site design to see it's low budget. That would put me off anyway.


04-25-11  08:24am

Reply
15
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from TheSquirrel:

This is true. I put that in my review. The other two sites that come in the package - Picking Up Pussy and TNA Tryouts do have the higher definition downloads, but not 18Eighteen. Don't know why.

04-18-11  06:32pm

Reply
16
Visit Fisting In Action

Fisting In Action
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from MargulisAZ:

Update for 2011 - Site is basically dead, has had 1 update in the last 2-3 months.

02-13-11  11:40pm

Reply
17
Visit Huge Strapon Lesbians

Huge Strapon Lesbians
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from MargulisAZ:

No update since 1/6/11. Site clearly advertises UPDATE EVERY WEEK!!!

Get your stuff together or stop advertising this!


01-23-11  11:18pm

Reply
18
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from Sarah:

I want to personally address this because it is not quite as simple as one may think (I am using Sarahs account to post because I do not have one). The fact of the matter is that this comment would not even be brought up if we did not give our members so much information. We are being negatively viewed because we show our members more than we should, perhaps. Step back and look at this for a moment. When we release a model we show you a full preview of all of her sets that were shot. We then allow our members to vote on which set they would like to see first and in what order they should be released. Everybody has his or her favorite set and if it comes in last place or near the bottom of the voting then that member is not happy. But the voting results are clearly posted and we go with what the majority wants. Plus many think the voting is kind of fun and it provides us feedback as to what types of sets are most popular.

All of this could be avoided if we simply did not present the promo pages, and if we did not allow the members to vote, and if we kept the members in the dark about what content is even available.

As it is we still release new content every single day of the week including weekends, during a time when many sites are moving towards updating once every 5-7 days. Every day we release either a full photoset (usually 200-400 pictures, while most other sites release much smaller sets of 50-70 pictures), or a full-length video scene of 15-30 minutes. During a single shoot we also shoot about 5-7 times the content that most other producers shoot during a modeling session. We do this because we are not in Los Angeles and we do not have ready access to all the models so when we do fly a model out we need to shoot as much as possible in as short of a time as possible so that she can get back to her other bookings. Keeping members in the dark has big advantages from our viewpoint. We could do what other sites do and simply release what we want when we want and the members would have no idea of what types of sets were shot or anything really about that particular model. We have been operating under the principle that we are not the experts – you members are, so we should give you as much information as possible about a model and her shoot and then let you tell us how it gets released. We believe members like having this ability – are we wrong? I would rather not go the route of keeping members in the dark because I prefer to have ALS Scan stand above the others in the area of giving members some input and control. We are only trying to do our best and give our members what they want. Hope this helps explain. Thanks, Alex


12-31-10  10:19am

Reply
19
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from Drooler:

Gee, I remember someone telling me (03-13-10) that "It's just porn." What happened? No more swooping down with another make-you-wrong-so-I-can-be-right-petty-ass head trip?

Oh, well. With you, MargulisAZ, it's a different story. I don't like how they break things up at ALS Scan, either. The promo pics is one item in particular. Once I download the pics of an actual scene, then I have to find the promo pics I saved and pick out the ones that go with the scene and put them in.

Well, I guess I don't have to.

It's nice that they let the users vote on the scenes, but it would be nice if at least after the vote we get the scenes sooner. And they probably do it as they do because it gets the users more involved, so they'll more likely stick around.

Actually, it used to be worse when they had separate categories of outtakes and bloopers. Maybe that got too complicated even for them.


12-28-10  02:27pm

Reply
20
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from anyonebutme:

Totally agree with you there, their release schedule drives me up a wall! By contrast I love the way Only-Tease handles updates, they have a very random/sporadic schedule but you have the option to grab a limited number of future updates each month, and pay extra to download any number of future updates immediately.

12-28-10  10:51am

Reply
21
Visit Hot Teens HD

Hot Teens HD
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment from ipg386:

There's nothing exclusive, and except for the few scenes that are in the preview pages, there's nothing worth looking at.

12-22-10  10:08pm

Reply
22
Visit Teen Models

Teen Models
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from yote78: (MargulisAZ's Reply)

Thanks for the feedback. What you say is pretty much what I thought was the case - that is, the site puts some of their hottest stuff in the trailers (especially the "compilation" trailer on the home page) to get members to join but after you do you find much of the content in the trailers hasn't been released yet, with very little prospect of it being released any time soon. It's true that new content is being released all the time but very, very little of it is what they show in the trailers.

This seems to me like somewhat of a lack of truth in advertising, a "bait-and-switch" for anyone who doesn't stop to compare what they're showing in the trailers vs. what's actually available. Not that porn sites are known for truth in advertising but this site just seems so good that I'd think they could do a little better than the rest. I'd really like to join this site but it really irritates me that they seem to have decided to release everything BUT what 's in the trailers first -some really great scenes, granted - and only give us a trickle of the content they imply is available if you go by what's in the trailers.

BTW, you say you "were" a member. Why did you leave? Just curious...

Happy "surfing!" - yote78

(Also, if you don't mind, I think I'll post the bulk of this reply to the PornUsers website. Maybe others would find it useful.)


06-10-10  08:09am

Reply
23
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Review from MargulisAZ:

**UPDATE** - So here is some new information, the latest update on the site, which went live about 6 days ago, was supposed to be of cameron love, but the video file is the same video file as the previous update Paige. The file is called "cameron", but it is not her, it is paige. So, I e-mailed the guy from the site about the problem. No response, and almost a week later, video is still wrong. Wish it was possible to give a 0 for this site.

05-13-10  11:58pm

Reply
24
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Review from slutty:

Hot damn, that was quite the smack-down. Guess I shouldn't join this site. It is sad when the male performer thinks they are the "star" of the show...

05-02-10  09:27pm

Reply
25
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from turboshaft: (MargulisAZ's Reply)

Yeah, I guess I do...but we all have to love something, don't we? ;-)

Though it has been two years since I last reviewed them, over a year since I was a 'regular' member (I rejoined for the first time in a long while last month), and my newer score is lower than before. I miss the way they were a few years ago but I think they still kick ass for dude-free material.


04-06-10  12:39am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 199 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.76 seconds.