| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from shooter:
(ramscrota's Reply)
I agree. The size of the load is much more important than the penis it cums from in porn. With that said a big cock should have a bigger load, but if a small cock can produce a huge cum load thats great too.
|
01-29-12 02:42pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from RagingBuddhist:
(ramscrota's Reply)
You mean they're all not in porn to work their way through college, on their way to becoming bio-mechanical engineers?
|
08-26-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Khan:
(ramscrota's Reply)
If you look through the old polls and/or the forum, you'll see this subject has been discussed at some length. We have no plans to change the Trust Ratings any further in to foreseeable future. We're fully aware that not all Users will agree with that policy.
|
12-31-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from abbywinters:
Clearly, my site is not for you. Hairy models is a forte of ours - we'd never encourage them to trim. There are plenty of places out there that DO have trimmed models - we're not competing with them.
|
07-04-07 04:49pm
|
Reply
5
|
Amour Angels
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from jd1961:
The models, actresses and other persons that appear in any visual depiction appearing or otherwise contained in this Website (AmourAngels.com) were over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time of the creation of such. AmourAngels hereby certifies that this website, and all graphic images associated therewith, is exempt from both the recordkeeping and labeling requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, because no images of "actual sexually explicit conduct" are contained within. All images were recorded prior to the effective date of the amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2257, pursuant to HR 4472. All photographers / producers are required to submit proper documents of the model, stating that her age is over 18, when submitting photos, and movies to AmourAngels.com.
|
01-02-09 06:45pm
|
Reply
6
|
DDF Busty
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from ace of aces:
are the videos exclusive or are they also seen on 1byday?
|
09-30-09 09:06am
|
Reply
7
|
DDF Busty
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Hi,
as I saw you submitted a review for DDFBusty so you got your answers ;-)
|
02-25-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
8
|
DDF Busty
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from TrashMan:
Haha, you are the first person to comment about the tendency of male actors to play nice with the camera and angle themselves out of the way to show them working while preventing the female body parts from being blocked (e.g. sex from an angle, cunnilingus from an angle, etc.). I'd rather them either play male POV (put the camera at a place that a person's eyes would otherwise be...its not like I am able to see the angled view in real-life), play female POV (put the camera in a place that the female's eyes would be during the action), or play zoom-out-the-camera (I am much more interested in the facial expressions during the scene and erotic positions than seeing a guy's features up close).
|
02-06-09 03:37am
|
Reply
9
|
Exploited Teens
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from host2626:
I agree, totally rubbish site.
- I like POV as long as it's properly done, I mean POV that shows the whole girl's body legs spread, allowing us to put our eyes on the body part we want and when we want it. Just like in reality. This guy's POV is the cheap and crappy kind of POV, which constantly goes from a closeup of the face to a closeup of the dick. Dick that definitely needs a lot of zooming in btw, considering the field of work he's in. I don't care about face closeups nor dicks, I watch porn to see beautiful female bodies being fucked - I am seeing enough faces in "regular" movies and could get plenty of dicks on gay porn sites were I attracted to these things. And I hate having a narrow field of view with the camera guy telling me on which body part I should focus and when. But doing the "full-body" type of POV would require hiring someone else to man the camera.
- The guy really talks too much crap. He is all about his own prowess while in fact he is, to remain polite, nothing special, and in porn terms, total rubbish. But repeating the same stuff over and over again may help convince a few viewers if not himself I suppose.
"See how hard you're getting me?" - no son, you are small *and* limp to boot. Hire someone with proper "talent".
When cumming, at the very first spurt (and sometimes even before) he goes "when is it gonna end?" - son, males do not stop at the first drop. It's physiological, there are always more than one, and to boot you don't deliver that much in total. A Peter North you're not, and no amount of repeating the same line will make you become him.
I mean I am not trying to make fun of the guy. He is what he is, has what he has, does what he does, seeing huge rock hard dicks is not the reason I am watching porn either, but I wish the guy stopped taking us for complete fools. I don't mind the guy tooting his own horn, some tongue-in-cheek humour could help a scene or two, but when this "joke" is repeated in every scene with nothing on-screen to support it, you know the guy is dead serious and this is getting really unnerving.
All in all, this site looks like the cunning plan of a rather average guy willing to fuck some stars and having us pay for it. I wouldn't mind this either if only I got some quality porn in return: no zoomed in POV and no ridiculous horn tooting. I haven't, so bye.
|
08-22-09 01:39am
|
Reply
10
|
Exploited Teens
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from TrashMan:
Well, the only thing they do well is they get certain girls to do b/g scenes that would otherwise not do them (e.g. Charlie Laine, although there was no penetration in her scene).
I just can't stand that a lot of the scenes feature no actual penetration, just showing genitalia contact.
|
12-30-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
11
|
Exploited Teens
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Thanks, mate. In the US, the American football term "dropkick" in slang usage is usually as a verb, as in "I'm gonna dropkick yo ass," for example.
Anyway, I've always enjoyed the very creative Australian version of English, "footy" (what Americans call soccer) being but one of the tamer examples.
|
12-29-08 03:22am
|
Reply
12
|
Exploited Teens
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from Drooler:
"A complete dropkick" -- what a great phrase! I just tried Googling it and found nothing. Perhaps you're the creator!
|
12-28-08 05:56am
|
Reply
13
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment from ramscrota:
Have been a member of femjoy, and you are right - the pics are HQ, the poses and postures are very erotic, etc. But it has one great shortcoming - the girls all start nude! I like the classic undressing shoot, where the mdoel begins fully clothed, and undresses ina teasing way, and teases with her face and eyes as well.
|
12-28-08 01:10am
|
Reply
14
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from TrashMan:
Everything is sensual on the site.
There are no videos which would fall into the "extreme" category, let alone hardcore. In other words you aren't going to see some guy manually abusing girls' feet to get off. You won't see food n' feet. You won't find massive foot eating (disgusting)...obviously you will see the guy indulge in a girl's feet, but only for a short while.
Sex scenes are nice and easy, with the guy focusing on working the girl's legs and feet during the scene.
Masturbation and glamor scenes are very nice. A lot of focus on the legs and feet, with nothing that would make you turn your head away (e.g. massive in-between toe licking, or awkward leg bends to achieve something sexual).
All scenes come with HQ images and video. Organization could use some work (to get it up to par with the organization of 1By-Day.com), but the layout works (beside being better than a handful of other porn sites out there).
There are not many other sites which are as good in the foot/leg fetish category.
|
01-07-09 02:46am
|
Reply
15
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from jd1961:
This site lives up to the billing IMO.
|
01-05-09 02:36pm
|
Reply
16
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Well, when you ask about "good erotic taste", you're definitely getting into subjective territory. One person's good erotic taste is another person's sub-standard crap. But having recently had a brief 8-day membership to the site as a bonus to 1-by-day, I found that this was the "niche" DDF site that kept me coming back to it most often during that period. There's a lot of material - I think they had 3 full sets of pics and vids per week, plus a casting special. The women are hot, there's a variety - if you like nylons or bare legs - younger, more mature, slender, more voluptuous, etc.
The vids are really well-filmed and show off the assets of their models beautifully.
That's my opinion anyway. And the reviews on this site have been good generally.
|
01-05-09 05:31am
|
Reply
17
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(1)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Raven:
Hi ramscrota,
Thanks for your question. HLF has been around since 2001 and our goal from the beginning has been to offer as much variety as possible. We have longtime members who have been members for years and won't go anywhere else. We are as passionate about legs and feet as you are. In 2009 we are adding new studios in the south of France in addition to our existing studios. It will be another great year coming up for HLF.
Best Regards
Raven
|
01-04-09 06:25am
|
Reply
18
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from badandy400:
Pics too big for screen. The first I have heard someone complain about resolution being too high. Use a resizing program, solve all these issues. Others of us with high res monitor like the larger pictures!
I must agree with the fast stripping though...slow it down a bit. Add more pictures if you have to. Lead up to the prize and it will be more enjoyed. Kinda like your mouth watering as you try to open a candy bar wrapper, you know it is coming and you know it will be good, it just make you want it that much more!
|
03-24-08 07:03pm
|
Reply
19
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from Boobs4ever:
Bottom Line to short in my opinion many personal cons less fact about what the site does offer ore doesnt offer in this review, no offense man usually I like your short reviews most of the time. This time tho a longer Bottom Line explainin a little more why its overated maybee?
|
07-19-07 02:47am
|
Reply
20
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
You made some good points and I'm (kind of)glad to see someone else point out that his servers are slow. On the other hand, I don't think smashing your computer over someone's lack of imagination would be a good idea.
What amazes me is that you didn't have to do battle with Matt over your rating. Considering how infrequent the video updates have been on the site, I'm now more inclined to agree with your number.
|
07-12-07 02:29pm
|
Reply
21
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Too bad - I've been tempted to join at times, never have - sounds like it's not worth it. She sure is good at self-promotion.
dewad - I thought I was going to learn some cool new acronym. Oh, well.
|
01-02-09 01:50pm
|
Reply
22
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Why is it a downer and what is a "dewad" loss?
|
12-29-08 07:02am
|
Reply
23
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from mbaya:
We all should complain when we experience dishonesty.
|
02-12-09 04:06pm
|
Reply
24
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Anth:
I like the word 'shonks' too.
It's one of those words you just know you've heard, but not sure where from, but automatically know its meaning.
But I came here after reading your reply to my Scoreland / ScoreGroup comments, or I should say my ScoreGroup Debacle notice.
I will definitely avoid this site too.
I have to also add this is a superb feature of TBP to allow users to do this. It would be better if they could also give these comments to these shiester websites that undertake this practice to get an explanation as why the did this.
Sort of like a Porn version of Watchdog.
|
02-12-09 07:25am
|
Reply
25
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
