| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from shooter:
(ramscrota's Reply)
I agree. The size of the load is much more important than the penis it cums from in porn. With that said a big cock should have a bigger load, but if a small cock can produce a huge cum load thats great too.
|
01-29-12 02:42pm
|
Reply
2
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from ace of aces:
are the videos exclusive or are they also seen on 1byday?
|
09-30-09 09:06am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from RagingBuddhist:
(ramscrota's Reply)
You mean they're all not in porn to work their way through college, on their way to becoming bio-mechanical engineers?
|
08-26-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
4
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from host2626:
I agree, totally rubbish site.
- I like POV as long as it's properly done, I mean POV that shows the whole girl's body legs spread, allowing us to put our eyes on the body part we want and when we want it. Just like in reality. This guy's POV is the cheap and crappy kind of POV, which constantly goes from a closeup of the face to a closeup of the dick. Dick that definitely needs a lot of zooming in btw, considering the field of work he's in. I don't care about face closeups nor dicks, I watch porn to see beautiful female bodies being fucked - I am seeing enough faces in "regular" movies and could get plenty of dicks on gay porn sites were I attracted to these things. And I hate having a narrow field of view with the camera guy telling me on which body part I should focus and when. But doing the "full-body" type of POV would require hiring someone else to man the camera.
- The guy really talks too much crap. He is all about his own prowess while in fact he is, to remain polite, nothing special, and in porn terms, total rubbish. But repeating the same stuff over and over again may help convince a few viewers if not himself I suppose.
"See how hard you're getting me?" - no son, you are small *and* limp to boot. Hire someone with proper "talent".
When cumming, at the very first spurt (and sometimes even before) he goes "when is it gonna end?" - son, males do not stop at the first drop. It's physiological, there are always more than one, and to boot you don't deliver that much in total. A Peter North you're not, and no amount of repeating the same line will make you become him.
I mean I am not trying to make fun of the guy. He is what he is, has what he has, does what he does, seeing huge rock hard dicks is not the reason I am watching porn either, but I wish the guy stopped taking us for complete fools. I don't mind the guy tooting his own horn, some tongue-in-cheek humour could help a scene or two, but when this "joke" is repeated in every scene with nothing on-screen to support it, you know the guy is dead serious and this is getting really unnerving.
All in all, this site looks like the cunning plan of a rather average guy willing to fuck some stars and having us pay for it. I wouldn't mind this either if only I got some quality porn in return: no zoomed in POV and no ridiculous horn tooting. I haven't, so bye.
|
08-22-09 01:39am
|
Reply
5
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from asmith12:
Are you sure it's a good idea to put that low rating for the site just because it's not your cup of tea? I mean that all "cons" in your review (except for the first one) are HIGHLY subjective and there are will be LOTS of people who have an exactly opposite opinion. Personally I'm at least trying to avoid setting low (especially THAT low) ratings to the sites which just aren't my cup of tea, at least if inside member area they provide essentially the same stuff as advertised on the tour pages.
|
04-03-09 06:49am
|
Reply
6
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Hi,
as I saw you submitted a review for DDFBusty so you got your answers ;-)
|
02-25-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
7
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from mbaya:
We all should complain when we experience dishonesty.
|
02-12-09 04:06pm
|
Reply
8
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Anth:
I like the word 'shonks' too.
It's one of those words you just know you've heard, but not sure where from, but automatically know its meaning.
But I came here after reading your reply to my Scoreland / ScoreGroup comments, or I should say my ScoreGroup Debacle notice.
I will definitely avoid this site too.
I have to also add this is a superb feature of TBP to allow users to do this. It would be better if they could also give these comments to these shiester websites that undertake this practice to get an explanation as why the did this.
Sort of like a Porn version of Watchdog.
|
02-12-09 07:25am
|
Reply
9
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
10
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from TrashMan:
Haha, you are the first person to comment about the tendency of male actors to play nice with the camera and angle themselves out of the way to show them working while preventing the female body parts from being blocked (e.g. sex from an angle, cunnilingus from an angle, etc.). I'd rather them either play male POV (put the camera at a place that a person's eyes would otherwise be...its not like I am able to see the angled view in real-life), play female POV (put the camera in a place that the female's eyes would be during the action), or play zoom-out-the-camera (I am much more interested in the facial expressions during the scene and erotic positions than seeing a guy's features up close).
|
02-06-09 03:37am
|
Reply
11
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(ramscrota's Reply)
As you'll notice, we've moved the Review to the correct site.
Good catch morgentau!
|
01-11-09 05:47am
|
Reply
12
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from morgentau:
Fight rounds? Are you sure you are writing your review about Sex And Submission and not Ultimate Surrender ?
|
01-09-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
13
|
Hot Legs And Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from TrashMan:
Everything is sensual on the site.
There are no videos which would fall into the "extreme" category, let alone hardcore. In other words you aren't going to see some guy manually abusing girls' feet to get off. You won't see food n' feet. You won't find massive foot eating (disgusting)...obviously you will see the guy indulge in a girl's feet, but only for a short while.
Sex scenes are nice and easy, with the guy focusing on working the girl's legs and feet during the scene.
Masturbation and glamor scenes are very nice. A lot of focus on the legs and feet, with nothing that would make you turn your head away (e.g. massive in-between toe licking, or awkward leg bends to achieve something sexual).
All scenes come with HQ images and video. Organization could use some work (to get it up to par with the organization of 1By-Day.com), but the layout works (beside being better than a handful of other porn sites out there).
There are not many other sites which are as good in the foot/leg fetish category.
|
01-07-09 02:46am
|
Reply
14
|
Real Spankings Institute
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great review. I agree with all you have said. One of my biggest negatives for this site is one of your "cons," namely there are far too many clothed spankings. This is one thing that has prevented me from re-subscribing to the site.
|
01-05-09 04:02pm
|
Reply
15
|
Hot Legs And Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from jd1961:
This site lives up to the billing IMO.
|
01-05-09 02:36pm
|
Reply
16
|
Hot Legs And Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Well, when you ask about "good erotic taste", you're definitely getting into subjective territory. One person's good erotic taste is another person's sub-standard crap. But having recently had a brief 8-day membership to the site as a bonus to 1-by-day, I found that this was the "niche" DDF site that kept me coming back to it most often during that period. There's a lot of material - I think they had 3 full sets of pics and vids per week, plus a casting special. The women are hot, there's a variety - if you like nylons or bare legs - younger, more mature, slender, more voluptuous, etc.
The vids are really well-filmed and show off the assets of their models beautifully.
That's my opinion anyway. And the reviews on this site have been good generally.
|
01-05-09 05:31am
|
Reply
17
|
Hot Legs And Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from Raven:
Hi ramscrota,
Thanks for your question. HLF has been around since 2001 and our goal from the beginning has been to offer as much variety as possible. We have longtime members who have been members for years and won't go anywhere else. We are as passionate about legs and feet as you are. In 2009 we are adding new studios in the south of France in addition to our existing studios. It will be another great year coming up for HLF.
Best Regards
Raven
|
01-04-09 06:25am
|
Reply
18
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from jd1961:
The models, actresses and other persons that appear in any visual depiction appearing or otherwise contained in this Website (AmourAngels.com) were over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time of the creation of such. AmourAngels hereby certifies that this website, and all graphic images associated therewith, is exempt from both the recordkeeping and labeling requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, because no images of "actual sexually explicit conduct" are contained within. All images were recorded prior to the effective date of the amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2257, pursuant to HR 4472. All photographers / producers are required to submit proper documents of the model, stating that her age is over 18, when submitting photos, and movies to AmourAngels.com.
|
01-02-09 06:45pm
|
Reply
19
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Too bad - I've been tempted to join at times, never have - sounds like it's not worth it. She sure is good at self-promotion.
dewad - I thought I was going to learn some cool new acronym. Oh, well.
|
01-02-09 01:50pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Khan:
(ramscrota's Reply)
If you look through the old polls and/or the forum, you'll see this subject has been discussed at some length. We have no plans to change the Trust Ratings any further in to foreseeable future. We're fully aware that not all Users will agree with that policy.
|
12-31-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
21
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from TrashMan:
Well, the only thing they do well is they get certain girls to do b/g scenes that would otherwise not do them (e.g. Charlie Laine, although there was no penetration in her scene).
I just can't stand that a lot of the scenes feature no actual penetration, just showing genitalia contact.
|
12-30-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
22
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from TrashMan:
When was the last time you visited the members section?
|
12-30-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
23
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Why is it a downer and what is a "dewad" loss?
|
12-29-08 07:02am
|
Reply
24
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(ramscrota's Reply)
Thanks, mate. In the US, the American football term "dropkick" in slang usage is usually as a verb, as in "I'm gonna dropkick yo ass," for example.
Anyway, I've always enjoyed the very creative Australian version of English, "footy" (what Americans call soccer) being but one of the tamer examples.
|
12-29-08 03:22am
|
Reply
25
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
from Drooler:
"A complete dropkick" -- what a great phrase! I just tried Googling it and found nothing. Perhaps you're the creator!
|
12-28-08 05:56am
|
