| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Bangbros Network
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Ozark:
(benmar51's Reply)
The offer i received was for 10 additional sites for that price. Did they alert you that you now had access to "Dancing Bear"? Do you have access to any other additional sites? I have read other comments about how easy it is to add additional sites if not paying close attention (not saying that is what happened). Whatever the case may be, for a site with such good original content (IMO) should really look into all their bad reviews and start some adjustments.
|
06-01-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
2
|
First Anal Quest
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(benmar51's Reply)
If there is then I have never seen it and I have downloaded at least 90% of their content. I think that might be something they do for their trailers.
|
03-21-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
3
|
VideosZ
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from hodayathink:
(benmar51's Reply)
Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.
|
03-16-13 09:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
VideosZ
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from hodayathink:
(benmar51's Reply)
Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.
|
03-16-13 08:58am
|
Reply
5
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(3)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
from porn9:
There is good content in there but don't appear like you want to view
It longer than it takes to get off or the interface will make that content unreachable or unviewable, or just provide 14 minutes of interview and stripping on a 30 minute scene.
|
02-02-13 09:32am
|
Reply
6
|
Jules Jordan
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(benmar51's Reply)
There are a couple of reasons why I said that. The first one is that although he still shoots porn movies. I find that his earlier stuff was far superior to what he tends to do these days and since the bulk of the ass factory's content is newer stuff then that's why I'm not interested. The second reason is the one that you stated. The site has over 100 videos at the moment but his update schedule is rather poor. The honest thing that he should have done is make only one site but I guess he wanted to make more money by splitting his work. It's his property and he can do what he wnats with it. In return it's my money and I can decide where i want to spend it and it won't be on his ass factory site.
I don't think 30$ is too expensive for what the ass factory has to offer but you should only join for what is inside and not what might become available.
|
01-18-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
7
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(benmar51's Reply)
Good point. Probably is my browser, Opera.
|
01-04-13 04:33am
|
Reply
8
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(benmar51's Reply)
Your suggestion was quite good. I was only trying to tell anyone who's a fan of Elegant Angel movies and who may not be aware that it's probably better to go with Elegant directly then it is to join VB since you'll get a lot more content for your money.
I'd much rather that VB add the older Elegant titles than the newer stuff since that's the stuff that I can't find anymore.
I also wish you a Merry Christmas and in case we don't talk for a while then an Happy New Year as well.
|
12-23-12 09:21am
|
Reply
9
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
from Dirt D:
Yes as someone has said above, it's a better option to just go direct for most of videobox's premium channels. You will have far more EXCLUSIVE content to choose from, which is always the key. VB never gets the newest stuff anyhow.
|
12-22-12 09:48am
|
Reply
10
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
from pat362:
Thanks for the info but I don't think it's such a good deal since VB was already offering Elegant movies prior to this. All they've done is add more recent titles but it's not really worth it since you can get all of these titles plus many more by simply joining Elegant Angel directly for 4$ more.
|
12-21-12 08:52pm
|
Reply
11
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mike11w:
(benmar51's Reply)
It's apparent that you are associated with vb. You still can't read or reason. VB's problems are not occasional, they are daily. If you are not totally illiterate, do your own research in this and other forums and you will see. Or, you could communicate directory with vb customer support as I have. They acknowledge the problems. Or you could just go back to your gay and tranny sites and calm down. Lastly, what makes you think I am not a girl, and as for my ass, you'll never see it.
|
10-21-12 02:44pm
|
Reply
12
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mike11w:
(benmar51's Reply)
1. As to moving the new releases, they did not announce it, you had no idea where they were or if there even were any. After many complaints they moved them back to the home page. It was a big deal. Nuff said.
2.Many members have complained about 404 redirects, site freeze-ups, long delays, log in failures and similar problems. These are reasons so many members still use VB2, the old site, which IS still available.
3.I agree that there are thousands of good dvds for new members, but the cutback from 5 new movies per day is more a factor of budget problems, as is evidenced by the continuing low quality of the new movies. I for one would be willing to pay more for this site if the technical problems could be addressed and the new updates improved in quality. I have told customer support this. The current price structure is not adequate to support such a large site with such complex options.
4. The page you go to in order to play a scene mysteriously quit displaying the star's name recently, even though it is shown on the prior page and on the movie summary. I was mot referring to uncredited stars. One member has received an email from customer support acknowledging that this is a problem, and that they are trying to fix it. Any fool knows that uncredited stars happen at the studio level, not at the end site level.
I suggest you spend a little more time reading and trying to understand critical posts before you blindly defend a favorite site.
|
10-20-12 03:09pm
|
Reply
13
|
Brazzers
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(benmar51's Reply)
What I said about Brazzer's PSP scene is the official response from Manwin and not my opinion. I agree that Kink's content is more extreme but they are tagged as a BSDM site and therefore no one joining that site will be surpsised by what's inside but you can't say the same thing for Brazzer. I still think that you will one day see a site with al the PSP content but underr a different banner.
|
09-11-12 05:45am
|
Reply
14
|
Brazzers
(7)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
from pat362:
I understand your frustration with Brazzer decision to remove all content attached to their PSP site but they had very little choice in the matter since Visa threatened to stop processing CC for them if they didn't remove all that content. Hopefully you joined at the right time and were able to download the videos before they were all removed.
I rarely have any problem with the site except that r3cently it is sometimes harder to log in to the site.
|
09-10-12 05:48pm
|
