Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : benmar51 (0)  

Feedback:   All (27)  |   Reviews (0)  |   Comments (6)  |   Replies (21)

Other:   Replies Received (20)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
REPLY TO #4 from Ed Freiland: (benmar51's Reply)

Hi,

The changes and improvements of our site are based on the feedbacks we received from our customers. The segmented download option was used by a really small percentage of our users and caused lots of complication.
We turned off a not so popular option and introduced lots of new and useful features. (mobile compatibility, better streaming quality etc.)

I hope you'll find our new features useful in the long run.

Best regards,
Ed Freiland


09-27-13  08:36am

Reply
2
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
REPLY TO #6 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

I'll return the compliment. This kind of dialogue is why I have always loved PU. I hope we can have other discussions and if you haven't taken a look at the forum then hopefully you will do so. It's always great to get new blood and new views.

09-26-13  02:35pm

Reply
3
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

I used to think that Kink was the safest company any girl could work for but the recent HIV events have made me seriously doubt that belief. Not for all of their sites but Public Disgrace is now in serious trouble and it would not surprise me to see it disappear or at the very least see it changed into something very different, The HC gangbang site is borderline for me. The plot themselves aren't an issue for me because they aren't real but the misogynistic way the girls get treated by the guys and the excessive physical violence in the form of face slapping, spitting, chocking means that I rarely join this site and when I do then I only save the odd video.

I know that it was once easier to differentiate between what FA does and what Kink's PD and HCGB do but I think that Kink crossed a line that they didn't realise was there and some of the stuff both of the above named sites do are starting to tread dangerously close to FA territory. I still think that there is a significant difference between both companies philosophy but that could change if Kink isn't careful.


09-26-13  03:40am

Reply
4
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

Just so that you don't think I got on my high horse to comment. I actually joined their site twice in the last 7 years. The last time about 2 years or so ago and the main reason was because they had so many big stars that I got fooled into thinking that these women wouldn't be willing to do the kind of shit women are expected to do for these people. I was wrong but more the second time than the first. Some of their older stuff is in many ways milder than what they have transitioned into.

I'm not sure why some women returned but the fact that some of them did might be worth looking into. I do know that at least one female performer was badly mistreated to the point that she actually stopped the scene in the very beginning and I saw some of the pictures she posted and read her account of the scene. Her testimony and those pictures are why I'm so adamant that these guys need to go away. For some sites the misogynistic style of porn is shtick but not with these guys.

They basically took everything that Max Hardcore did that was wrong and they multiplied it by 10.


09-25-13  02:41pm

Reply
5
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
Reply of benmar51's Comment from pat362:

I guess you are a fan of their type of porn so my following comments are probably not going to please you but I'm not for a few reason and one of them is their attitude toward the performers. Case in point the following description for some of their recent updates:

"Kennedy Adams is a 27 year old financial world fuck up. She couldn't cut it in the mainstream business world so she's trying her mouth, pussy and ass out at porn. Honestly, if she wasn't so plane Jane looking, she could be something. It was fun watching her chug down on hard cock and lose whatever dignity was left floating around in that silly little head of hers. Watch her ass get destroyed! Civilian bitches are always the most fun to film. Their reactions are real. Go ahead and jerk it?

"Veronica Wild is 20 years old, new to porn and talks more than any whore should... but yet she says nothing. Joan Jett haircut, check. Big tits, check. Complete idiot, check. This is the type of dummy built for porn. All holes were used up by Bootleg. This big Amazonian was put through the test with some hard face fucking. She was barfing up a week's load of food and semen when Bootleg drove his cock down her throat. After that miserable experience was over, the next was ready to begin... painal! We're talking hard, rough anal. Her butt cheeks were split in two and she was vocal about it. Bootleg acted like he was in an ice cream shop double dipping his cock from ass to pussy to ass to pussy. Then, the nut shot to the face. Once she said she hates the taste of cum, you know what happened next... we had her eat the load from her face and tits. Watch as she gags trying to put it down. Awesome!?

These are just two samples but it doesn't get any better. I feel sorry for any girl sent to these guys because the vast majority of them don't know what they are in for and it's quite common for many of them to never do another porn shoot after this one.


09-25-13  03:36am

Reply
6
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from hodayathink: (benmar51's Reply)

Search around for tutorials on how to download Youtube videos. Most of those tutorials work for most porn sites.

08-20-13  10:24pm

Reply
7
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(6)
REPLY TO #8 from Ozark: (benmar51's Reply)

The offer i received was for 10 additional sites for that price. Did they alert you that you now had access to "Dancing Bear"? Do you have access to any other additional sites? I have read other comments about how easy it is to add additional sites if not paying close attention (not saying that is what happened). Whatever the case may be, for a site with such good original content (IMO) should really look into all their bad reviews and start some adjustments.

06-01-13  06:02pm

Reply
8
Visit First Anal Quest

First Anal Quest
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

If there is then I have never seen it and I have downloaded at least 90% of their content. I think that might be something they do for their trailers.

03-21-13  06:36pm

Reply
9
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(5)
REPLY TO #9 from hodayathink: (benmar51's Reply)

Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.

03-16-13  09:36pm

Reply
10
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(5)
REPLY TO #7 from hodayathink: (benmar51's Reply)

Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.

03-16-13  08:58am

Reply
11
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(2)
Reply of benmar51's Comment from porn9:

There is good content in there but don't appear like you want to view
It longer than it takes to get off or the interface will make that content unreachable or unviewable, or just provide 14 minutes of interview and stripping on a 30 minute scene.


02-02-13  09:32am

Reply
12
Visit Jules Jordan

Jules Jordan
(2)
REPLY TO #5 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

There are a couple of reasons why I said that. The first one is that although he still shoots porn movies. I find that his earlier stuff was far superior to what he tends to do these days and since the bulk of the ass factory's content is newer stuff then that's why I'm not interested. The second reason is the one that you stated. The site has over 100 videos at the moment but his update schedule is rather poor. The honest thing that he should have done is make only one site but I guess he wanted to make more money by splitting his work. It's his property and he can do what he wnats with it. In return it's my money and I can decide where i want to spend it and it won't be on his ass factory site.

I don't think 30$ is too expensive for what the ass factory has to offer but you should only join for what is inside and not what might become available.


01-18-13  06:29pm

Reply
13
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #1 from Jay G: (benmar51's Reply)

Good point. Probably is my browser, Opera.

01-04-13  04:33am

Reply
14
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

Your suggestion was quite good. I was only trying to tell anyone who's a fan of Elegant Angel movies and who may not be aware that it's probably better to go with Elegant directly then it is to join VB since you'll get a lot more content for your money.

I'd much rather that VB add the older Elegant titles than the newer stuff since that's the stuff that I can't find anymore.

I also wish you a Merry Christmas and in case we don't talk for a while then an Happy New Year as well.


12-23-12  09:21am

Reply
15
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of benmar51's Comment from Dirt D:

Yes as someone has said above, it's a better option to just go direct for most of videobox's premium channels. You will have far more EXCLUSIVE content to choose from, which is always the key. VB never gets the newest stuff anyhow.

12-22-12  09:48am

Reply
16
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of benmar51's Comment from pat362:

Thanks for the info but I don't think it's such a good deal since VB was already offering Elegant movies prior to this. All they've done is add more recent titles but it's not really worth it since you can get all of these titles plus many more by simply joining Elegant Angel directly for 4$ more.

12-21-12  08:52pm

Reply
17
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #4 from mike11w: (benmar51's Reply)

It's apparent that you are associated with vb. You still can't read or reason. VB's problems are not occasional, they are daily. If you are not totally illiterate, do your own research in this and other forums and you will see. Or, you could communicate directory with vb customer support as I have. They acknowledge the problems. Or you could just go back to your gay and tranny sites and calm down. Lastly, what makes you think I am not a girl, and as for my ass, you'll never see it.

10-21-12  02:44pm

Reply
18
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
REPLY TO #2 from mike11w: (benmar51's Reply)

1. As to moving the new releases, they did not announce it, you had no idea where they were or if there even were any. After many complaints they moved them back to the home page. It was a big deal. Nuff said.

2.Many members have complained about 404 redirects, site freeze-ups, long delays, log in failures and similar problems. These are reasons so many members still use VB2, the old site, which IS still available.

3.I agree that there are thousands of good dvds for new members, but the cutback from 5 new movies per day is more a factor of budget problems, as is evidenced by the continuing low quality of the new movies. I for one would be willing to pay more for this site if the technical problems could be addressed and the new updates improved in quality. I have told customer support this. The current price structure is not adequate to support such a large site with such complex options.

4. The page you go to in order to play a scene mysteriously quit displaying the star's name recently, even though it is shown on the prior page and on the movie summary. I was mot referring to uncredited stars. One member has received an email from customer support acknowledging that this is a problem, and that they are trying to fix it. Any fool knows that uncredited stars happen at the studio level, not at the end site level.

I suggest you spend a little more time reading and trying to understand critical posts before you blindly defend a favorite site.


10-20-12  03:09pm

Reply
19
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (benmar51's Reply)

What I said about Brazzer's PSP scene is the official response from Manwin and not my opinion. I agree that Kink's content is more extreme but they are tagged as a BSDM site and therefore no one joining that site will be surpsised by what's inside but you can't say the same thing for Brazzer. I still think that you will one day see a site with al the PSP content but underr a different banner.

09-11-12  05:45am

Reply
20
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(5)
Reply of benmar51's Comment from pat362:

I understand your frustration with Brazzer decision to remove all content attached to their PSP site but they had very little choice in the matter since Visa threatened to stop processing CC for them if they didn't remove all that content. Hopefully you joined at the right time and were able to download the videos before they were all removed.

I rarely have any problem with the site except that r3cently it is sometimes harder to log in to the site.


09-10-12  05:48pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.08 seconds.