| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from messmer:
Another great and detailed review. I have one question, some of my Score sites (50plus MILFS, 60plus MILFS) have gone to limited downloads of videos. Did they change this site as well?
|
01-16-12 12:09pm
|
Reply
52
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from otoh:
As per the esteemed gaypornolover - another hugely comprehensive review, good to have you on board and look forward to more!
|
01-16-12 01:53am
|
Reply
53
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from gaypornolover:
WOW now this is what I call a review! Well done - love the grades you give too!
|
01-15-12 08:25pm
|
Reply
54
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from Monahan:
At $39.99 per month, this is one of the more expensive sites out there...and yet they have the audacity to offer Scoreland for "just" $19.99 more.
I like the content as described in this review but I would think the webmaster would make a whole lot more money by getting horndogs like me to sign up at $29.99 for the package.
|
01-15-12 04:25pm
|
Reply
55
|
Scoreland
(1)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from BradlyH:
Unique way of doing a review, but very well done! I was also a member at this site and from my experiences you covered a lot from it and what it has to offer us breast guys :)
|
01-15-12 02:11pm
|
Reply
56
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(BubbaGump's Reply)
Thanks for the excellent information. Your technical knowledge surpasses mine exponentially. I realize that some people might find this level of information boring, but I'm not one of those.
I hadn't thought of the issue you note with streaming versus downloading, namely that a person streaming the video is unlikely to watch the whole thing, where the person downloading takes the whole file. To add to your argument, even though I download, it's rare for me to watch the scene from start to finish. But where downloading is superior is in being able to access the file at any time without having to have an internet connection or still be a member of the site.
I'm one of the members who keeps coming back to the buffet and who likely looks like a glutton, but I only join sites where I know I'm going to enjoy the material so it just makes sense that if I've put a lot of effort into finding a site I know I'll like that I download a lot. I may seem indiscriminate to the webmaster, but the webmaster can't know the effort I put in to finding that specific site.
I am glad to hear that if there are people like me who use a lot of bandwidth that there are more who don't and the site continues to make money. I'm a porn fan and an active porn buyer and I realize that unless sites make money they won't make more porn.
What do you think of tiered pricing? What if RK offered a $20 membership for streaming and up to 10GB a day and $30 for up to 50GB per day? Would that work? I'm certainly willing to pay for what I get.
|
01-13-12 10:01am
|
Reply
57
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(BubbaGump's Reply)
I should have read this response before asking you questions based on your other response! I'd say you answered my questions here.
I agree that piracy is probably a big concern, but limits still bug me!
|
01-12-12 02:02pm
|
Reply
58
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(BubbaGump's Reply)
Interesting thought, and it makes sense with so many people using streaming these days.
I have no technical knowledge at all, but how would streaming and downloading be different from a server's perspective? I didn't download any HD material because of the cap and I don't recall if HD was offered by streaming, but if I download a 2GB scene and you stream it, wouldn't that be the same to the server? But... now that I think of it, I could be comparing apples and oranges here too. I recall that a WMV HD scene is less compressed than an mp4, so streaming may even use a higher compression, thereby making your streaming less of a data hog than my downloading.
Still... it seems odd that I'd be cut off after accessing 10GB of data and other users wouldn't.
|
01-12-12 02:00pm
|
Reply
59
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from Cybertoad:
Nice well , done review. I found out things I did not know about the site. Great Job.
|
01-12-12 10:23am
|
Reply
60
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
from rearadmiral:
Really interesting, informative and well written review! I like the level of detail and I expecially like your thorough descriptions and how your own tastes impact on how you view the site. That's an important element because it allows a reader to make decisions on how their own tastes will be served by the site. I also liked your letter grades for various aspects. That works well within the context of a full review like this.
I was a RK member here recently and HATED the daily download limit. That tainted everything else about the site for me, and I wasn’t that big a fan of the site to begin with. What I find interesting is that the limit doesn’t apply to streaming. Is it possible that you just didn’t hit the 10GB cut-off? I’ll admit though that the contract speaks to a cap on downloads, not data transfer. If they cap downloads by allow data to stream unfettered, this seems odd and may point to another purpose for the limit. Any thoughts?
|
01-12-12 04:09am
|
