Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (400)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (358)

Other:   Replies Received (159)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 159 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Jay G: (Marcus's Reply)

Doorstop...... good, but I already have so many doorstops going back to my old Texas Instruments & Commodore 64 computers (Remember 64 KILOBYTES!)

06-20-14  07:35am

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #2 from LPee23: (Marcus's Reply)

When HD came out years ago, some people cautioned that the extra detail may not be appealing when it shows blemishes. As we all know, the market has since voted overwhelmingly in favor of HD, with standard definition video being below almost anyone's standards today for a paysite.

04-30-14  01:03pm

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #7 from pat362: (Marcus's Reply)

In that case then I definitely don't watch porn for more than an hour.

07-20-13  06:47pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #9 from graymane: (Marcus's Reply)

A resounding echo for Marcus's sentiments for Fame Girls.
I've found nothing, anywhere in commercial porn, whether hardcore or otherwise that gets my juices flowing like these three gals ....above and especially prominent among them being Ella, a stunning blond knockout whose body I suspect must'a been sculptured by the Gods, who started modeling for Fame Girls either in early or preteens, who, now is twenty, is still non-nude, still WOWS'EM ... and who's notoriety has grabbed global attention.
Yeah ..... there's a lot of non-nude action out there better than the hard stuff.


07-16-13  03:49pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #7 from pat362: (Marcus's Reply)

The art of tease is one thing but how much tease can you really get out of a non-nude model doing mostly glamour shots? I can understand being attracted to a specific model because of her overall appearance
but at some point you must want more than just looking at her with clothes on. My biggest issue with non-nude or for that matter nude modeling is that it can be visually pleasing to the eyes but it's not going to sexually excite me and sooner or later I want more from that model.


07-16-13  03:00pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Cybertoad: (Marcus's Reply)

Yes thats dead on to my thoughts on this.

06-08-13  08:14am

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #15 from gaypornolover: (Marcus's Reply)

LOL I'll take her husband - I always liked him, though I prefer Joe in Family Guy!

01-06-13  08:37pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #5 from marcdc1: (Marcus's Reply)

I'm with Marcus. This is acting and a fantasy.

If done well I think it can be very hot especially in some of the amateur sites where I think it is more about fantasy and less about acting.

I agree with the rest of the post where if it is done as abuse - that's not my think. to put some context to this conversation I think myhotwife is an incredible sexy wife where the husband talks about "pimping out his wife. A site like facial abuse is less erotic.


10-27-12  06:29am

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (Marcus's Reply)

Interestingly enough I found on a Google search a site called Barelist a Bio that states:

Biography: Nikky Cassidy was born in Quebec Canada and is 5'5 and 114 lbs with a big pair of enhanced 32D tits.

Looking at the photos from her website, some of them don't look enhanced and they don't look D'd, but then some do, so it's hard to say.

I found no other reference to my query of "Nikky Cassidy" cup size.


06-01-12  08:59am

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Monahan: (Marcus's Reply)

I agree with Marcus. A solo model site with an update once or twice a week is fine, but most sites should post an update at least once a day (or 6 times a week) to boast having "frequent updates."

05-16-12  10:53pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Monahan: (Marcus's Reply)

I agree with Marcus...except in one aspect. Many ads are now disguised as part of a site's content so clicking on the link and expecting to see something created by the site instead gets you redirected to another site and a sales pitch. That's an intrusive pain in the ass that I don't need and, if it continues, would make me change my vote to "I hate them."

05-11-12  10:08am

Reply
12
Visit Ann Angel XXX

Ann Angel XXX
(2)
Reply of Marcus's Review from dgerity:

Ann Angel has left her site to persue

new technological breakthru in Glamor

Model live broadcasting. Her site

webmaster and the corporation owners

have refused to drop live showing of

Ann Angel Instead they now broadcast

ten year old video and photos on their site as

live performances and galleries of Ann Angel

scamming their cutomer who pay to see

Ann Angel live. They keep scheduling the video

reruns as live performances. I have

traced the server to their staten

island server.


04-13-13  05:57am

Reply
13
Visit Ann Angel XXX

Ann Angel XXX
(2)
REPLY TO #4 from pat362: (Marcus's Reply)

I find that her other site is even more of a scam because you can't download anything. I don't agree with sites that offer streaming only of their videos but I at least understand why they do this but I really don't understand why you would prevent paying members the ability to download the photosets. She appears to still be doing cam shows but I'm not sure if they are only for ehr site or if she freelances on other sites. She is quite active on Twitter.

03-10-13  07:50am

Reply
14
Visit Ann Angel XXX

Ann Angel XXX
(2)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (Marcus's Reply)

The only reason I called it a scam is because there is so little HC on this site that almost everyone joining will feel cheated since this is suppose to be her HC site. This is compounded by the fact that she has a few other softcore sites so unless someone sees your review prior to joining then they will rightly assume that Ann is doing only HC stuff on this site.

That's not to say that a few months or a year from now that the site won't be full of HC porn but that won't help all the people who like you joined expecting some HC porn from a favorite girl.


03-10-13  05:37am

Reply
15
Visit Ann Angel XXX

Ann Angel XXX
(2)
Reply of Marcus's Review from pat362:

Thanks for the review.

If I read your review correctly then her site is pretty much a scam since she hasn't actually done any hardcore sex yet. She may have done some midcore stuff but that is not the same thing at all.


03-09-13  06:48pm

Reply
16
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from tangub: (Marcus's Reply)

It seems like she's paranoid about having her content stolen...I wonder what's the betting there's no downloads available like in her old site.

I also found this in the news...."This is the only place you will be able to see over 50,000 pics of me that I have been adding each week for the past 3years, as well as over 60hrs of video".....but when i check the tour I only see 18 updates listed. Will look forward to your review if you take the plunge.


10-14-12  01:17am

Reply
17
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Khan: (Marcus's Reply)

ok, thanks. They're going to look into adding that site.

10-13-12  05:47am

Reply
18
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Khan: (Marcus's Reply)

I mentioned the info in your post to our editors and they asked me to ask you where on the site you found this info?

10-13-12  05:33am

Reply
19
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
Reply of Marcus's Comment from tangub:

I guess she's not bothered about making any money from the new site since the "join now" button leads to a 404 page.

10-05-12  11:16am

Reply
20
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
Reply of Marcus's Review from tboy:

Wow that's a new low, thanks for the warning.

12-31-11  11:23am

Reply
21
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)
Reply of Marcus's Review from rearadmiral:

Good God! If I had spent $25 to get NOTHING I think I'd be less polite than you! Wow! Thanks for the warning.

12-31-11  09:03am

Reply
22
Visit Ass Parade

Ass Parade
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from pat362: (Marcus's Reply)

I think we can both agree that whichever option someone picks. That person will have had at least one dollar stolen from his pocket and if he or she is not carefull than that amount could go up pretty quickly.

03-29-13  06:32pm

Reply
23
Visit Ass Parade

Ass Parade
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from marcdc1: (Marcus's Reply)

Excellent points. Like I said in my opening remarks. I surprised they do this. I don't think I'm that savvy of a customer (lord knows I've maid plenty of mistakes in my time). It seems to me they'll lose more in bad reputation then they'll ever gain with these practices.

03-29-13  08:47am

Reply
24
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from martinlongbow: (Marcus's Reply)

here is the problem. when i sort the websites by anal niche, the highest scored website is the one that was not updated for years. obviously when someone who does not know looks into that , they will think it is the best anal site. however, sites like anal teen angels, or bwb are way way better than. so either give them higher scores and take this one out.

03-20-13  06:43pm

Reply
25
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (Marcus's Reply)

Thanks for the comments.

I agree that the upsells are what causes the site to lose a lot of credibility. But the baffling thing is that they don't need the upsells. They have an incredibly good product that sells itself. And the problem that many report with the upsells is that you don't even get a warning that you're heading into extra-cost territory. I didn't experience that. The one add-on I did buy was clearly an extra cost.


04-20-14  06:35am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 159 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.17 seconds.