| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Teen Dreams
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
Oh that's different, I click on join and get a form requesting my bank account details to set up a direct debit. Never heard of this billing company webbilling. Don't think I'll be joining Teen Dreams anytime again soon. And yes I also see $29.99 or £19.99 (GBP) so the discount seems to have gone for me too.
|
04-13-13 12:55am
|
Reply
2
|
Teen Dreams
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
I don't think it has ever worked for non-US residents.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-12-13 11:32pm
|
Reply
3
|
Catie Minx
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
I checked her site out and also her blog site and here is what I can tell you.
1-She is a cam model first so be advised that you will probably get bombarded with offers to see her do cam shows. I seems that you get access to some weekly free cam chats but you'll still have to pay to see some action.
2-This is a really hot looking girl who once had great small breasts. She is still hot looking but she recently got implants.
3-There is so little to see in her preview sections that you really don't know what your money will get you.
4-There are no update schedules anywhere so who knows how old the content is. I can confirm based on Freeone that she has been doing cam stuff since 2011 and by default some of the stuff on her preview sections has to be older thana few months since she now has implants and nowhere do you see that.
**It's your money so you can do what you want with it but I wouldn't touch this site even if it was half the price it is. It is afterall 30$ so that is very high for solo model site.**
|
03-17-13 05:37am
|
Reply
4
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Joymii:
SexArt is a cool site. All three of us have different styles and worth a look. In my opinion, here's what to expect:
Joymii - young models, high end productions emphasizing passionate couple sex and girls as natural as possible. Less fantastical. eg. You should feel like that's the bedroom you have(or want), and the girl you want in that bedroom.
X-Art - will remind you of softcore films on late night cable, which is a good thing! A bit more dreamy quality.
SexArt - full on fantasy. If you like Zalman King or porn from the 90s, this is right up your alley
|
03-07-13 01:37pm
|
Reply
5
|
Wow Girls
(4)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from cjd2004:
I am not a member but I would assume that the larger zip contains photos that have not been scaled from the camera resolution.
|
03-01-13 01:04am
|
Reply
6
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RLane's Reply)
I would save you the money and heartache when you join a solo model site hoping to get some intimate stuff and some exclusif content. Only to discover that there is neither and what there is isn't worth the money you paid.
I got burned so badly when I first started surfing the net that I had no choice but to avoid all solo model sites. Luckily it's not as bad now (in large part because of TBP/PU) but it's still wise to ask before you take out your credit card.
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
7
|
MC Nudes
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
Beautiful as the models are, I like to see progression from fully clothed to full nudity in a set. The journey is as important as the destination for me.
It looks like they are nude from photo one in most sets?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-24-13 03:22am
|
Reply
8
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from otoh:
I've not joined Sex Art, but have been a member both at X Art and at Joymii. They are very, very similar sites, so if you liked X Art, you should like this. But for my money, I prefer Joymii - the difference is subtle, but the photography just seems better - the sets, colours, angles are a bit different, a bit more interesting.
|
02-24-13 01:12am
|
Reply
9
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from luv lickn clit:
It is kinda odd RLane, almost like they must be piggybacking on the end of someone else's photo shoot, but they only have the time to do one vid and one photo set. It would definitely be nice to see multiple photo sets and vids from them, as they do have a unique style.
|
02-23-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
10
|
Tegan Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
If you haven't read my comments for Lela Star then do so because they apply to her site as well. The one thing that may be different here is that you do get access to a network of porn performers so $18 is not be such a bad deal. Be advised that a percentage of the performers on the network are no longer active in porn so content is likely to be older and there won't be any addition.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
11
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
My rule of thumb with all solo model sites is that unless you know exactly what you are getting inside the members area then it means that there isn't anything of value. If you have visted her site then you already know that you can't see the content so she falls under the avoiud like the plague.
I'd also like to add that she hasn't posted anything on her Twitter accout since last July and she wasn't really active as a performer a long time before that so you are certainly won't be getting anything recent.
|
02-23-13 06:16pm
|
Reply
12
|
Playboy Plus
(3)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from philfromusa:
I think the size thing was recently changed, as images from Amateur "Holly Jean" in "SERENE DESIRE" are at 3840 on the small side & 5760 on the long side.
|
01-02-13 09:50am
|
Reply
13
|
Playboy Plus
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Mikey24:
(RLane's Reply)
In your experience, which sites come close to Playboy in terms of model quality but also offers truly hi-res photo sets? I think Digital Desire comes close with certain models.
|
11-30-12 02:08pm
|
Reply
14
|
Playboy Plus
(3)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Mikey24:
Hmm so even the newer photo sets have a max resolution of 1920x1280? That's quite disappointing considering most other sites have avg. 3000pixels on the long side.
|
11-29-12 11:49pm
|
Reply
15
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't mean to sound negative, but there are so many, glam artsy photo sites that they tend to get pretty anonymous.
( Actually, Met art is a prime example of that.
It is so formulaic that each set blends into another ).
If he is going to be successful in this venture, he needs to find a good angle on the content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-22-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
16
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah I did notice this photographer had gone solo now with his own site, its good for him I guess as he/she gets to showcase their work only and get more recognition but would have to remain at a lower end subscription fee till it has a good amount of models. Sometimes Metart though does seem a little intimidating with its vastness and you need lots of time to get through it, maybe a smaller site is a good idea if you really their photos.
|
11-22-12 09:45am
|
Reply
17
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Denner:
Ahm - still a rather limited amount of material - and especially vids. Looks fine in general, ok - but I'll put it on hold....and wait for more content.
|
11-22-12 07:30am
|
Reply
18
|
Eva's Garden
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Claypaws:
I was a member about two months ago. They do not really have a download limit (unless it is larger than I would ever hit). But they make accessing and downloading difficult with irritating timeouts. If you click a download link (for a zip), you have to begin downloading it within about 2 minutes or the link times out. You cannot use a download manager but DownThemAll in Firefox works provided you start the download within under two minutes. So you cannot queue them.
Links from thumbnails to photos also time out in a few minutes. If you have had the thumbnail page for a photo set on display for more than about five minutes, then clicking a thumbnail just gives you the black bar that you describe. You have to return to the model's main page, open the photo set again from that page and then you can click thumbnails again successfully for the next five minutes. It is happy with opening in a new tab but only if you work within those timings.
Your entire login times out after a while. I cannot remember how long but I think it was somewhere between one and two hours. If your login has timed out, you cannot access anything until you restart the browser and then log in again.
They have a forum but they ignore all criticism and suggestions. They respond quickly to reports of definite faults though, such as blind links or missing images. Occasionally, they respond to praise of individual photo sets or models. Disrespectful comments are removed, which is fair enough. But they do themselves no favours by ignoring all constructive criticism.
|
05-16-12 05:36am
|
Reply
19
|
Dirty Ashlyn
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
She certainly looks different here, I don't think I've seen her with the blonde hair before. Think I preferred her more as a natural brunette than a fake breasted blonde. Only 2 days ago I discovered some nice pre boob job photo shoots of her at My Glamour Site.
|
05-13-12 01:17am
|
Reply
20
|
Erotic Beauty
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Abel Semen:
Not a member, but it seems to be the *tiniest* bit harder than Met-Art now. Models actually kiss each other, lick their lips and otherwise act overtly erotic, but its still only softcore as far as I can tell from the free portion of the site. Not nearly as big a difference as between Met-Art and Sexart, for example.
|
04-18-12 12:00am
|
Reply
21
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
As a long-time member, I've got to say that their regular price of $59.95/3 months, recurring at $54.95/3 months is a great deal itself, given the quality and quantity of their updates.
|
03-16-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
22
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Sarah:
ALS Scan rarely has any discounts and when we do they are generally offered only to current or past members.
But you can email webmaster@s2.alsscan.com to see if any are currently being offered.
|
03-14-12 01:05pm
|
Reply
23
|
Natasha Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
There might be someone but I rather doubt it so here is what I think you should do. You should stay far away from this site. That is unless you have 25$ dollars that's buring a hole in your pocket and you really don't know what to do with it and even then I think you could find a lot better things to invest in then this site. This is your typical solo model site with a few clothed, semi-nude or all nude photos and videos and not much else. Now that might just be what you want but I still think you can find better. I'm including a link to a another members review of the other site owned by the same company. You'll see that the site didn't get avery good score and i don't think her's will be any better.
http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64579
You could start a thread in the forum on what you are looking for and if you are looking for a model that looks like Natasha then reference her site so that people get an idea of what type of model you like.
|
03-13-12 07:22pm
|
Reply
24
|
Artfemme
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
August, 2006 was the only time I joined. Max size was 1200 pixels. I took a few other notes, too: very slow server, links to 3,000 pixel images that didn't exist anyway.
And: NO ZIPS.
Well, once was enough. Their "recent updates" are from 2006, too, so go figure.
|
01-27-12 11:16am
|
Reply
25
|
Erotic Beauty
(2)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
I think the revamp and renaming of the site is an attempt to give the site its own individual identity. Under the name Met Models I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art.
From the tour it looks like they are using the exact same site layout i've just encountered at the other Met sister site The Life Erotic which is a big improvement as they have addressed some of the cons i mentioned in my review of last year such as the lack of a decent model index. I also notice from the tour that they have doubled the update rate to 2 per day from 19th January so i guess that would be their justification for the price increase.
|
01-26-12 03:41am
|
