Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : cjd2004 (0)  

Feedback:   All (72)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (12)  |   Replies (55)

Other:   Replies Received (46)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from abbywinters:

Unfortunately, Maddison Yong and us did have some problems when she came to shoot with us.

Maddison's report above is accurate, though does miss out some aspects (She had several grooming issues, including a rash, an allergic reaction to sometimes). We engage models well before their shoot date to discuss how seriously we take grooming matters (several emails, and several phone calls), and make it very clear that we will not proceed with the shoot if they do not meet the standards our customers require and expect.

We do this, because we do not allow models to wear makeup (our customers tell us again and again, they want no makeup), and we never photoshop images (to remove blemishes). Ms Young alluded that in her previous work with other companies, makeup and post-production work had solved these problems, and she was mystified as to why we could not use the same tools. We explained that this was one of our selling points, but she was not satisified with that.

We prefer to simply wait until the model is looking her best. Most of our models appreciate this, and let us know in advance if they have any issues (for example, by texting us the night before, or emailing pictues of the affected area from their phone).

Unfortunately, Ms Young had a pressing schedule, and was unable to wait a few days for the blemishes to go away.

In our emails to her, we apologised for our harsh rules, reminded her that we did make this very clear that it was a condition of working with us, complimented her on the excellent shoots she did do for us, and invited her to return to do more shoots at her convenience. That invitation is still open.

We have shot around 1500 models over the last 12 years, and never had a model so upset about our grooming requirements as Ms Young was. We reviewed our procedures in several meetings afterwards, to idnentify where we "went wrong", with a view to improving our processes, and identified that we made every reasonable effort to communicate clearly.

At the end, we resolved that we just "rubbed eachother the wrong way".


07-10-12  01:11am

Reply
2
Visit Action Girls

Action Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from PinkPanther: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yeah, and it looks like they added some original material on Feb 13 & Feb 15 - then decided they were tired and needed a nap and haven't updated again since then. On their last legs, that's for sure!

02-27-13  10:24pm

Reply
3
Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from tangub: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks for the reply. I couldn't get your wayback link to work at first until I changed the https to http, anyway it seems to confirm that they are posting old content masquerading as recent updates. Comparing the number of covers in the old tour to the latest one I would guess they've removed something like 50 sets from the site to rotate as new updates which makes me even less likely to join than if they were being honest and simply leaving the entire collection online available to download in a membership.

02-27-13  03:18am

Reply
4
Visit Burning Angel

Burning Angel
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks! It looks like I'll be taking a trial membership this weekend to get some of the photos sets I wanted.

02-12-14  05:15pm

Reply
5
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
REPLY TO #2 from timeac1: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yes that too...

At least the only want the number not the expiry date or CID number.

It is sad a site with decient content would resort to crap like that and what I complained about.


02-01-13  09:19pm

Reply
6
Visit Erotic Beauty

Erotic Beauty
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (cjd2004's Reply)

You're right. I wasn't aware of it, or didn't think of it. And they do call it the MetArt Network of sites.

Thanks for the correction.

And if I hadn't already given you a positive trust rating, I would give you one now!


11-28-12  04:43am

Reply
7
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
REPLY TO #9 from Drooler: (cjd2004's Reply)

Why, yes! Funny, I hadn't noticed the connection. Well, it isn't as though they've cornered the "joy" market. ;) Thanks for pointing that out.

01-25-13  05:00pm

Reply
8
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from Addict: (cjd2004's Reply)

They now have mp4 downloads as well. Unfortunately I think download manager issue remains.

09-17-13  12:52am

Reply
9
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
REPLY TO #8 from exotics4me: (cjd2004's Reply)

I'm not for sure on that one. But it's the point I was making. If he's going to just have one update per week, what does it hurt him to post the high superpics of every set instead of the 1600 high end ones? Would it really hurt his profits to offer past members a slightly lower price knowing he only updates once per week and there wouldn't be much new for them to download? As it is, I'm bumping it back to joining maybe once every two years. I do know the webmaster can be a jerk. If you haven't seen that look up how he talked about Eufrat and complained about her "poor English" knowing good and well when he hired her she wasn't a native English speaker. He went as far as leasing that set to other sites and went on a rant about how he would never hire another Euro model, seems like he called them "fake, plastic, robotic". His comments on Danni Yeager's sets were also bad. He blames the models when the sets don't go how he thinks they should go.

12-10-12  03:27pm

Reply
10
Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (cjd2004's Reply)

Some photosets at Erotic Beauty do have the metadata "date taken", other photosets do not.
The Avril photoset does not have the "date taken" metadata.

The same thing for Metart. Some photosets have the metadata "date taken", others do not.

It would be nice if more of these photos had that information.


02-12-13  07:28am

Reply
11
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from lk2fireone:

Really pays to read the fine print.
$US99.95 every 30 days after the initial period!
Either that is a mis-print (pricing error), or a scam to trap the unwary.
I wonder how many people will be caught by this?
I've always thought Hegre was a major site, ethical.
If I was stupid enough to pay S99.95/month on re-bills, I'd never join this site again.


11-27-14  01:47am

Reply
12
Visit Hidden Zone

Hidden Zone
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from David19: (cjd2004's Reply)

Interesting. As I noted in my review, it is always possible that this material is staged, but if so, they've definitely done a great job in making it appear real--much better than most similar sites.

Most sites do contain a generic 2257 disclaimer to try to keep the US authorities satisfied. You'll notice that usually--and this site is no exception--they are not exactly encouraging of efforts to actually obtain the 2257 records. Usually to actually get the records they claim to have, you need to write--snail mail only--to some address in a foreign country where it is presumably difficult and slow to enforce US law.

I'm not saying for sure that the material is real as opposed to staged. It is just it is often difficult to know what these 2257 disclaimers really mean. 2257 disclaimers are there for the sole purpose of legal protection, not to disseminate any real info about what the site is all about.


04-15-14  08:58am

Reply
13
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from Drooler:

Holly Randall has good content, but for me it hasn't had the same draw as MetArt. Hopefully, this affiliation will give the Holly Randall content a boost. Two things would help in the process. One is to make sure that the HR site (or sites) are as web-friendly as the MetArt sites are. Just look at the difference between them. MetArt has a nice, subdued visual approach, whereas the Holly Randall site is garish and cluttered. They clearly speak in two very different visual languages.

The second is to make the approach to the photography, especially the types of poses, more consistently like MetArt's as well.


01-26-13  04:00pm

Reply
14
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from luv lickn clit:

Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.

01-25-13  05:27pm

Reply
15
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from lk2fireone:

I'm currently a member of Metart. Years ago it was just Metart and Metmodels. I knew they had added a few other sites recently, but didn't realize how many they have added. I hope it increases the financial stability of the Metart site itself, which is my favorite site for softcore photography. A lot of sites fall on hard times, and either go out of business or become archive sites that no longer update.

And now, Metart is not just a mega-site by itself, but is becoming a mega-network.


01-25-13  07:41am

Reply
16
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from otoh:

Interesting news indeed! I've been a member of her site before, and whereas it's more glam-porn-y than my usual taste, I do have a fondness for it. Seems Met Art are definitely branching out into more racy material... which can only be a good thing IMHO, given the banality (purely subjective!) of the main site.

01-25-13  06:29am

Reply
17
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from otoh: (cjd2004's Reply)

Unfortunately I'm so into teens; ideally I like girls in maybe mid-20s or more. But still, a good site and worth considering - thanks for the tip!

10-08-11  12:39am

Reply
18
Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from Yosemite: (cjd2004's Reply)

It's been so long ago that I changed my email address it seems that they've changed the feature that I used. It's a little easier now but my curiosity got the best of me and I used the "chat" feature to find out how it is done now.

You can use several avenues to make the change but I would recommend using the "chat" or "Live Help" button in the top right of the Home page. The "chat" feature is available 24/7 as is their help contact phone number which is 1-800-345-6684.

Whichever feature you use you will need the following information to make the change:

1. Your current Vod.com registered email address.
2. Your complete name and address.
3. The last 4 digits and expiration date of your credit card or last 4 digits of your checking account and bank routing number, whichever you used to purchase your minutes.
4. The new email address you wish to use as your new logon information.

Hope this solves your problem.


10-26-14  10:52pm

Reply
19
Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
(1)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from Yosemite:

I changed my email on Hot Movies/Classic VOD with no problems. In fact, it was the least of my problems. LOL!

10-23-14  12:55pm

Reply
20
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from humiliatrix: (cjd2004's Reply)

Guess who loves Humiliatrix? Sissies. I know, crazy.

Lol seriously I told my twitter followers I had a sissy mission for them, and posting some new reviews here was one of their tasks.

https://twitter.com/humiliatrix/status/218390172608376832


07-01-12  09:19am

Reply
21
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yeah, but in fairness to these guys if Tanner Mayes had a site and told me to review it, that would be the first score of 200 ever awarded on PU.

Seriously though, there might be some bias in these reviews...


06-29-12  08:23pm

Reply
22
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(1)
REPLY TO #9 from Joymii: (cjd2004's Reply)

Anal sex is painful to most women and men without proper training and practice. Compared to porn, anal sex is uncommon in people's sex lives.

That said, shouldn't anal porn be an outlet for couples to enjoy something they cannot have in their real life?


12-26-13  07:05pm

Reply
23
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(1)
REPLY TO #6 from Parsnip: (cjd2004's Reply)

Try talking to a few... I didn't actually say all women hate anal, that would be ridiculous. A tiny percentage can enjoy it, and a few more can withstand it when pressured into it ("if you really loved me you would...") - but seriously, 80+% of BG porn is anal, do you really think that when maybe 2 or 3% in the real world can do it, 80% of porn girls want to?
My wife's kid sister did some porn a few years ago, the typical porn career of one trip out to LA. She hadn't planned on telling the family, but the injuries she received meant in the end she had to, so we know about how the girls are bullied and pressured into it, and about the injections and drugs they take to get through it. If you have any empathetic intelligence at all, you will see most of the time in an anal scene that you are watching a girl in pain or distress - obviously most porn is made by and for men who don't notice or don't care. Sure, at the top of the market they can do it a bit nicer, but it is still essentially the same act.


12-26-13  12:12pm

Reply
24
Visit Life Selector

Life Selector
(0)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from LifeSelector:

Hello,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts/concerns about LifeSelector.

We use a unique encoding method for user passwords that can only be reversed/unencoded via secure tokens by our dedicated support personnel. The option is only used in rare cases where manual assistance (such as in your case) is required.

We have added the option to change the email address associated with the account to our development queue, this should simplify the process you described.

Regards,
Ed
Member Relations
LifeSelector.com


06-18-14  07:36am

Reply
25
Visit Meow Misti Dawn

Meow Misti Dawn
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (cjd2004's Reply)

The new stuff is free. You can only stream it but then again I don't see the point in saving it anyway.

04-11-12  05:51pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.76 seconds.