Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : cjd2004 (0)  

Feedback:   All (63)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (8)  |   Replies (50)

Other:   Replies Received (41)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 41 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Hidden Zone

Hidden Zone
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from David19: (cjd2004's Reply)

Interesting. As I noted in my review, it is always possible that this material is staged, but if so, they've definitely done a great job in making it appear real--much better than most similar sites.

Most sites do contain a generic 2257 disclaimer to try to keep the US authorities satisfied. You'll notice that usually--and this site is no exception--they are not exactly encouraging of efforts to actually obtain the 2257 records. Usually to actually get the records they claim to have, you need to write--snail mail only--to some address in a foreign country where it is presumably difficult and slow to enforce US law.

I'm not saying for sure that the material is real as opposed to staged. It is just it is often difficult to know what these 2257 disclaimers really mean. 2257 disclaimers are there for the sole purpose of legal protection, not to disseminate any real info about what the site is all about.


04-15-14  08:58am

Reply
2
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from brotherlove:

Several of Twistys top models, including, but not limited to, Elle Alexandra, Bree Daniels, Vanessa Veracruz and Emily Addison, who was planning to come back and shoot for them again have all said they will never shoot for Twistys again. Follow them on Twitter for more info.

Additionally, one of the best photographers they use, Tammy Sands, who shoots a lot of the Treat content, has said she will never shoot for Twistys again.

The content manager, know as Twistys Rob, quit because he didn't want to be part of fixing the Treat of the Year contest.

Twistys also shut down the forums and is now deleting most critical comments posted to content. Basically the new people in charge now are big on censoring/silencing customers complaints.

Twistys is also rumored to be planning to be reducing new solo and g/g content and going with more b/g content eventually, which is why the named the 5th place finisher the 2014 Treat of the Year runnerup, because she does b/g.

Look into #BoycottTwistys on Twitter for more details on the drastic changes to Twistys management.


03-22-14  11:10pm

Reply
3
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from PinkPanther:

Looks like the heat in the forums got to be too much for them - the forum is now "unavailable" while it is being "upgraded"

03-15-14  05:34pm

Reply
4
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from monty2222:

What a bunch of a**holes. Cancelled my membership immediately and I'm never going back.

03-15-14  11:06am

Reply
5
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from brotherlove:

From a Twitter post I saw the only one allowed to do or say anything negative is Twistys (MindGeeks). It's ok for them to $hit all over models, members, photographers and employees, but if you complain about it you are banned.

03-15-14  10:44am

Reply
6
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from cjd2004:

Well it appears they have gone crazy on the forum, banning people left right and centre. Looks like it's only a question of time before they get deleted entirely.

03-15-14  07:24am

Reply
7
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from pat362:

Here are two pieces of information to explain what's likely to happen to most Manwin properties in the months to come.

http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/manwin-m...am-in-montreal-9324/

http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/twistys-...-complete-scam-9311/


03-14-14  08:21am

Reply
8
Visit Burning Angel

Burning Angel
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks! It looks like I'll be taking a trial membership this weekend to get some of the photos sets I wanted.

02-12-14  05:15pm

Reply
9
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(2)
REPLY TO #9 from Joymii: (cjd2004's Reply)

Anal sex is painful to most women and men without proper training and practice. Compared to porn, anal sex is uncommon in people's sex lives.

That said, shouldn't anal porn be an outlet for couples to enjoy something they cannot have in their real life?


12-26-13  07:05pm

Reply
10
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from Parsnip: (cjd2004's Reply)

Try talking to a few... I didn't actually say all women hate anal, that would be ridiculous. A tiny percentage can enjoy it, and a few more can withstand it when pressured into it ("if you really loved me you would...") - but seriously, 80+% of BG porn is anal, do you really think that when maybe 2 or 3% in the real world can do it, 80% of porn girls want to?
My wife's kid sister did some porn a few years ago, the typical porn career of one trip out to LA. She hadn't planned on telling the family, but the injuries she received meant in the end she had to, so we know about how the girls are bullied and pressured into it, and about the injections and drugs they take to get through it. If you have any empathetic intelligence at all, you will see most of the time in an anal scene that you are watching a girl in pain or distress - obviously most porn is made by and for men who don't notice or don't care. Sure, at the top of the market they can do it a bit nicer, but it is still essentially the same act.


12-26-13  12:12pm

Reply
11
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(4)
REPLY TO #2 from Addict: (cjd2004's Reply)

They now have mp4 downloads as well. Unfortunately I think download manager issue remains.

09-17-13  12:52am

Reply
12
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(5)
REPLY TO #1 from RLane: (cjd2004's Reply)

I just found that out, It was confusing that they put Original and not 5616px.

03-01-13  12:01pm

Reply
13
Visit Action Girls

Action Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from PinkPanther: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yeah, and it looks like they added some original material on Feb 13 & Feb 15 - then decided they were tired and needed a nap and haven't updated again since then. On their last legs, that's for sure!

02-27-13  10:24pm

Reply
14
Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from tangub: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks for the reply. I couldn't get your wayback link to work at first until I changed the https to http, anyway it seems to confirm that they are posting old content masquerading as recent updates. Comparing the number of covers in the old tour to the latest one I would guess they've removed something like 50 sets from the site to rotate as new updates which makes me even less likely to join than if they were being honest and simply leaving the entire collection online available to download in a membership.

02-27-13  03:18am

Reply
15
Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (cjd2004's Reply)

Some photosets at Erotic Beauty do have the metadata "date taken", other photosets do not.
The Avril photoset does not have the "date taken" metadata.

The same thing for Metart. Some photosets have the metadata "date taken", others do not.

It would be nice if more of these photos had that information.


02-12-13  07:28am

Reply
16
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(5)
REPLY TO #2 from timeac1: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yes that too...

At least the only want the number not the expiry date or CID number.

It is sad a site with decient content would resort to crap like that and what I complained about.


02-01-13  09:19pm

Reply
17
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(1)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from Drooler:

Holly Randall has good content, but for me it hasn't had the same draw as MetArt. Hopefully, this affiliation will give the Holly Randall content a boost. Two things would help in the process. One is to make sure that the HR site (or sites) are as web-friendly as the MetArt sites are. Just look at the difference between them. MetArt has a nice, subdued visual approach, whereas the Holly Randall site is garish and cluttered. They clearly speak in two very different visual languages.

The second is to make the approach to the photography, especially the types of poses, more consistently like MetArt's as well.


01-26-13  04:00pm

Reply
18
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(1)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from luv lickn clit:

Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.

01-25-13  05:27pm

Reply
19
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from Drooler: (cjd2004's Reply)

Why, yes! Funny, I hadn't noticed the connection. Well, it isn't as though they've cornered the "joy" market. ;) Thanks for pointing that out.

01-25-13  05:00pm

Reply
20
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(1)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from lk2fireone:

I'm currently a member of Metart. Years ago it was just Metart and Metmodels. I knew they had added a few other sites recently, but didn't realize how many they have added. I hope it increases the financial stability of the Metart site itself, which is my favorite site for softcore photography. A lot of sites fall on hard times, and either go out of business or become archive sites that no longer update.

And now, Metart is not just a mega-site by itself, but is becoming a mega-network.


01-25-13  07:41am

Reply
21
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(1)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from otoh:

Interesting news indeed! I've been a member of her site before, and whereas it's more glam-porn-y than my usual taste, I do have a fondness for it. Seems Met Art are definitely branching out into more racy material... which can only be a good thing IMHO, given the banality (purely subjective!) of the main site.

01-25-13  06:29am

Reply
22
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(4)
REPLY TO #8 from exotics4me: (cjd2004's Reply)

I'm not for sure on that one. But it's the point I was making. If he's going to just have one update per week, what does it hurt him to post the high superpics of every set instead of the 1600 high end ones? Would it really hurt his profits to offer past members a slightly lower price knowing he only updates once per week and there wouldn't be much new for them to download? As it is, I'm bumping it back to joining maybe once every two years. I do know the webmaster can be a jerk. If you haven't seen that look up how he talked about Eufrat and complained about her "poor English" knowing good and well when he hired her she wasn't a native English speaker. He went as far as leasing that set to other sites and went on a rant about how he would never hire another Euro model, seems like he called them "fake, plastic, robotic". His comments on Danni Yeager's sets were also bad. He blames the models when the sets don't go how he thinks they should go.

12-10-12  03:27pm

Reply
23
Visit Erotic Beauty

Erotic Beauty
(2)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (cjd2004's Reply)

You're right. I wasn't aware of it, or didn't think of it. And they do call it the MetArt Network of sites.

Thanks for the correction.

And if I hadn't already given you a positive trust rating, I would give you one now!


11-28-12  04:43am

Reply
24
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(4)
Reply of cjd2004's Reply from cjd2004:

Oops - I meant upscaled.

10-13-12  08:13pm

Reply
25
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(7)
REPLY TO #2 from Micha: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thank you cjd2004 for your reply. It did no help to log off and then log back on. I tried to delete history with cookies un-checked, but that didn't help. Twisty's tech support guy was helpful and seemed more knowledgeable than most. He said all cookies must be deleted, so I bit the bullet and deleted them. Email, Facebook, TV listings and every other site that requires passwords or stores my personal info in a cookie, was affected. Every time I log on to them, the cookies are reset, only to be deleted the next time I wanna see a thumbnail. My browser is the latest version of Firefox.

I have nothing bad to say about Twistys content, it's great. So good that I will struggle through for the remainder of my month, but I will not renew or return. The CAPCHA bullshit is insufferable. These tired old eyes cannot work out their puzzle.

micha


10-04-12  12:04am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 41 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.17 seconds.