Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : cjd2004 (0)  

Feedback:   All (74)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (12)  |   Replies (57)

Other:   Replies Received (47)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
REPLY TO #5 from Parsnip: (cjd2004's Reply)

Both these look possible - I knew about EroticaX, but my concern is that the main target of the producers is HardX which is a site I wouldn't go near, EroticaX just looks like something they're not really interested in.

I hadn't heard of Lust Cinema - from the review it looks like it doesn't allow downloads. Is this the case?

02-14-15  11:20am

Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from lk2fireone:

Really pays to read the fine print.
$US99.95 every 30 days after the initial period!
Either that is a mis-print (pricing error), or a scam to trap the unwary.
I wonder how many people will be caught by this?
I've always thought Hegre was a major site, ethical.
If I was stupid enough to pay S99.95/month on re-bills, I'd never join this site again.

11-27-14  01:47am

Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
REPLY TO #2 from Yosemite: (cjd2004's Reply)

It's been so long ago that I changed my email address it seems that they've changed the feature that I used. It's a little easier now but my curiosity got the best of me and I used the "chat" feature to find out how it is done now.

You can use several avenues to make the change but I would recommend using the "chat" or "Live Help" button in the top right of the Home page. The "chat" feature is available 24/7 as is their help contact phone number which is 1-800-345-6684.

Whichever feature you use you will need the following information to make the change:

1. Your current Vod.com registered email address.
2. Your complete name and address.
3. The last 4 digits and expiration date of your credit card or last 4 digits of your checking account and bank routing number, whichever you used to purchase your minutes.
4. The new email address you wish to use as your new logon information.

Hope this solves your problem.

10-26-14  10:52pm

Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from Yosemite:

I changed my email on Hot Movies/Classic VOD with no problems. In fact, it was the least of my problems. LOL!

10-23-14  12:55pm

Visit Life Selector

Life Selector
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from LifeSelector:


Thanks for sharing your thoughts/concerns about LifeSelector.

We use a unique encoding method for user passwords that can only be reversed/unencoded via secure tokens by our dedicated support personnel. The option is only used in rare cases where manual assistance (such as in your case) is required.

We have added the option to change the email address associated with the account to our development queue, this should simplify the process you described.

Member Relations

06-18-14  07:36am

Visit Twistys

REPLY TO #2 from PinkPanther: (cjd2004's Reply)

Is there a difference? Didn't they become Mindgeek in order to deal with tax evasion charges or some crap?

06-18-14  12:12am

Visit Hidden Zone

Hidden Zone
REPLY TO #1 from David19: (cjd2004's Reply)

Interesting. As I noted in my review, it is always possible that this material is staged, but if so, they've definitely done a great job in making it appear real--much better than most similar sites.

Most sites do contain a generic 2257 disclaimer to try to keep the US authorities satisfied. You'll notice that usually--and this site is no exception--they are not exactly encouraging of efforts to actually obtain the 2257 records. Usually to actually get the records they claim to have, you need to write--snail mail only--to some address in a foreign country where it is presumably difficult and slow to enforce US law.

I'm not saying for sure that the material is real as opposed to staged. It is just it is often difficult to know what these 2257 disclaimers really mean. 2257 disclaimers are there for the sole purpose of legal protection, not to disseminate any real info about what the site is all about.

04-15-14  08:58am

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from brotherlove:

Several of Twistys top models, including, but not limited to, Elle Alexandra, Bree Daniels, Vanessa Veracruz and Emily Addison, who was planning to come back and shoot for them again have all said they will never shoot for Twistys again. Follow them on Twitter for more info.

Additionally, one of the best photographers they use, Tammy Sands, who shoots a lot of the Treat content, has said she will never shoot for Twistys again.

The content manager, know as Twistys Rob, quit because he didn't want to be part of fixing the Treat of the Year contest.

Twistys also shut down the forums and is now deleting most critical comments posted to content. Basically the new people in charge now are big on censoring/silencing customers complaints.

Twistys is also rumored to be planning to be reducing new solo and g/g content and going with more b/g content eventually, which is why the named the 5th place finisher the 2014 Treat of the Year runnerup, because she does b/g.

Look into #BoycottTwistys on Twitter for more details on the drastic changes to Twistys management.

03-22-14  11:10pm

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from PinkPanther:

Looks like the heat in the forums got to be too much for them - the forum is now "unavailable" while it is being "upgraded"

03-15-14  05:34pm

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from monty2222:

What a bunch of a**holes. Cancelled my membership immediately and I'm never going back.

03-15-14  11:06am

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from brotherlove:

From a Twitter post I saw the only one allowed to do or say anything negative is Twistys (MindGeeks). It's ok for them to $hit all over models, members, photographers and employees, but if you complain about it you are banned.

03-15-14  10:44am

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from cjd2004:

Well it appears they have gone crazy on the forum, banning people left right and centre. Looks like it's only a question of time before they get deleted entirely.

03-15-14  07:24am

Visit Twistys

Reply of cjd2004's Comment from pat362:

Here are two pieces of information to explain what's likely to happen to most Manwin properties in the months to come.



03-14-14  08:21am

Visit Burning Angel

Burning Angel
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks! It looks like I'll be taking a trial membership this weekend to get some of the photos sets I wanted.

02-12-14  05:15pm

Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
REPLY TO #9 from Joymii: (cjd2004's Reply)

Anal sex is painful to most women and men without proper training and practice. Compared to porn, anal sex is uncommon in people's sex lives.

That said, shouldn't anal porn be an outlet for couples to enjoy something they cannot have in their real life?

12-26-13  07:05pm

Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
REPLY TO #6 from Parsnip: (cjd2004's Reply)

Try talking to a few... I didn't actually say all women hate anal, that would be ridiculous. A tiny percentage can enjoy it, and a few more can withstand it when pressured into it ("if you really loved me you would...") - but seriously, 80+% of BG porn is anal, do you really think that when maybe 2 or 3% in the real world can do it, 80% of porn girls want to?
My wife's kid sister did some porn a few years ago, the typical porn career of one trip out to LA. She hadn't planned on telling the family, but the injuries she received meant in the end she had to, so we know about how the girls are bullied and pressured into it, and about the injections and drugs they take to get through it. If you have any empathetic intelligence at all, you will see most of the time in an anal scene that you are watching a girl in pain or distress - obviously most porn is made by and for men who don't notice or don't care. Sure, at the top of the market they can do it a bit nicer, but it is still essentially the same act.

12-26-13  12:12pm

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
REPLY TO #2 from Addict: (cjd2004's Reply)

They now have mp4 downloads as well. Unfortunately I think download manager issue remains.

09-17-13  12:52am

Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
REPLY TO #1 from RLane: (cjd2004's Reply)

I just found that out, It was confusing that they put Original and not 5616px.

03-01-13  12:01pm

Visit Action Girls

Action Girls
REPLY TO #1 from PinkPanther: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yeah, and it looks like they added some original material on Feb 13 & Feb 15 - then decided they were tired and needed a nap and haven't updated again since then. On their last legs, that's for sure!

02-27-13  10:24pm

Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
REPLY TO #1 from tangub: (cjd2004's Reply)

Thanks for the reply. I couldn't get your wayback link to work at first until I changed the https to http, anyway it seems to confirm that they are posting old content masquerading as recent updates. Comparing the number of covers in the old tour to the latest one I would guess they've removed something like 50 sets from the site to rotate as new updates which makes me even less likely to join than if they were being honest and simply leaving the entire collection online available to download in a membership.

02-27-13  03:18am

Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (cjd2004's Reply)

Some photosets at Erotic Beauty do have the metadata "date taken", other photosets do not.
The Avril photoset does not have the "date taken" metadata.

The same thing for Metart. Some photosets have the metadata "date taken", others do not.

It would be nice if more of these photos had that information.

02-12-13  07:28am

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
REPLY TO #2 from timeac1: (cjd2004's Reply)

Yes that too...

At least the only want the number not the expiry date or CID number.

It is sad a site with decient content would resort to crap like that and what I complained about.

02-01-13  09:19pm

Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from Drooler:

Holly Randall has good content, but for me it hasn't had the same draw as MetArt. Hopefully, this affiliation will give the Holly Randall content a boost. Two things would help in the process. One is to make sure that the HR site (or sites) are as web-friendly as the MetArt sites are. Just look at the difference between them. MetArt has a nice, subdued visual approach, whereas the Holly Randall site is garish and cluttered. They clearly speak in two very different visual languages.

The second is to make the approach to the photography, especially the types of poses, more consistently like MetArt's as well.

01-26-13  04:00pm

Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
Reply of cjd2004's Comment from luv lickn clit:

Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.

01-25-13  05:27pm


REPLY TO #9 from Drooler: (cjd2004's Reply)

Why, yes! Funny, I hadn't noticed the connection. Well, it isn't as though they've cornered the "joy" market. ;) Thanks for pointing that out.

01-25-13  05:00pm

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 2.38 seconds.