| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(BradlyH's Reply)
Hi. Thanks. It's a nice site for at least a one-month subscription.
|
01-17-12 03:27pm
|
Reply
2
|
I Love Bitties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from yadayada321:
(BradlyH's Reply)
Only one network site has all the goods with a little toy play. Everything else is all big boobs.
|
01-12-12 12:59am
|
Reply
3
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(BradlyH's Reply)
I must admit i don't really have a very critical eye for the technical aspects of the photography as i'm more interested in looking at the models but yes there does appear to be some touching up going on here. I certainly don't get the same natural lighting feel as i did with Breath Takers for instance.
|
01-11-12 03:24am
|
Reply
4
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from yote78:
Looks pretty unexciting to me, although the models all look very hot. Doesn't strike me that there's to much action going on other than a lot of naked posing. I gotta have more than that. If they could bump it up to at least close to the caliber of TeenModels, X-Art or joymii, then I'd definitely be interested.
|
01-09-12 11:06am
|
Reply
5
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from otoh:
Concur with Cap'n - a great and thorough review, Brad. A shame the site is lacking; one thing that appeals to me there is the mix of models; eg I like Asian and Latina models, but wouldn't necessarily join a purely Asian/Latina site; but sadly few sites have a good spectrum of ethnicities. I'm tempted by melina.com which seems good in that area, although it's just a small site.
|
01-09-12 09:11am
|
Reply
6
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from Capn:
A solid review of a frustratingly disappointing site. Nicely done. :0)
You are correct that it looks more like a portfolio than a membership site.
If they could update/clean up the website, & add more photos of higher quality then they might start to get somewhere!
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-08-12 04:20pm
|
Reply
7
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Boutique Media:
(BradlyH's Reply)
Annie here, webmaster and shooter at girlsoutwest.com. We feature real Aussie girls on our site. They are so real they are imperfect in many ways, and perfect in other ways. Big personalities often come with big boobs, nice round booty, and kick arse attitude to sex and nudity.
Unlike other sites that feature European girls, that look like they need a good meal, have blank bored expressions, and clearly are not enjoying themselves, let alone hold a conversation....
I love shooting girls that have that certain energy - that come fuck me look, a desire to express their sexuality, to fuck on camera, a unique body, with a personality that you can hang with all day long, and have a good fun time.
Annie
xox
|
01-08-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
8
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
from otoh:
Still my favourite site too. It's changed a bit this year; we've lost some of the variety in locations, no outdoor shoots etc; but we've made up for it with some great new models, great lingerie and a helpful webmaster providing almost made-to-order sets.
I'm sure I'll be resubscribing (and not at all defiantly... :| ) - $15 is a steal for a daily updated site, but the one year seems to have stayed the same - now equivalent to 10 months, so arguable as to whether it's a good buy?
|
01-04-12 11:14am
|
Reply
9
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Khan:
(BradlyH's Reply)
For our purposes, when a user shares a computer with the webmaster of a site then that's too close.
BTW, we will not make a habit of discussing administrative action in threads.
|
12-26-11 12:18pm
|
Reply
10
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Khan:
(BradlyH's Reply)
I think post #8 above makes that evident.
|
12-26-11 12:04pm
|
Reply
11
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from RLane:
Although you listed in the Cons about some non-nude sets, but for me that's a pro. Thanks for this review, for that I'll be adding this site to my next subscription.
|
12-10-11 09:08pm
|
Reply
12
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from wanker28:
(BradlyH's Reply)
Thank yo.
Unfortunately I joined this site a few days ago, its pretty poor.
|
10-17-11 12:52am
|
Reply
13
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from wanker28:
How softore are the video's?
Any masturbation?
The models look great but not keen on signing up only to find that its just posing etc
|
10-14-11 11:41am
|
Reply
14
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Cybertoad:
(BradlyH's Reply)
LOL hey if I can give an accurate review LOL
|
09-21-11 01:22pm
|
Reply
15
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(BradlyH's Reply)
I should specify that its 19.95 recurring if you stay longer
and there are exactly 155369 pics to be exact LOL
|
09-21-11 01:10pm
|
Reply
16
|
Busty Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from trishabcarson:
nice post
|
09-21-11 06:14am
|
Reply
17
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from otoh:
Another good reviews, Brad - and I agree about zips, why do so few sites not simply include the name of the model and the set name in the zip? I'm not sure if I'd give an instant 100 to one that does :| but still, simply having the model name and set name in the zip would make things much easier. I deal with it by downloading with DownThemAll (a free download manager for Firefox) that lets you change the names of files as you download them.
|
09-20-11 11:23pm
|
Reply
18
|
Busty Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from otoh:
Surely bundling in 'Busty Teens' with '18 and Busty' is a bit superfluous? :D
|
09-20-11 11:19pm
|
Reply
19
|
Want Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
from Khan:
That review was removed because it was 22 words and no real pro/cons so it didn't meet our minimum standards for a Review. We also do not allow Reviews based on limited trials. The user was invited to resubmit as a Comment.
BTW, we don't make a habit of remarking on individual submissions to others.
I have asked our editors to look into if the site is there or not.
|
09-20-11 03:01pm
|
Reply
20
|
Watch My GF
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from sg1guy:
(BradlyH's Reply)
I live in the uk and though this is some high quality stuff, and there is a deal £30 for3 months , 2 tick box's as a bonus NICE!, login and its full of old shite that i think is all on redtube - youporn etc, i then check the billing and its £40 and im like what? they charged me for the other 2 sites? so i checked this billing site called vendo , cancelled over the phone and of course will cancel with the card in the morning, fucking hell, but yeah no contact for the web admin to complain, i would be happy if they had the pictures of the content on the main page and sent the set to me by email, at least i would get half of what i wanted instead of nothing at all, get this , TEEN came up with some creepy fat goths, not what i was expecting and there are NO HD images, they all look like they have been taken with windows 95 web cam and you know the quality of that shit is.
well hope this helps
|
09-20-11 02:40pm
|
Reply
21
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
from tboy:
Yeah it surprises me when webmasters fail on the file/zip naming front, it's actually very easy to automate that kind of thing and there is really no excuse!
Also regarding archive content I guess it's a real difficult one for web masters, it annoys me too when a specific model is broadcast on the front of a site only to find her portfolio is 8 years old in 320x240.
Old digital media can't be re-scanned like film and I guess most studios have used digital equipment since inception, I actually think that on most sites they should cull the older stuff in a yearly quality control process because it can really bring the overall site down.
Or at least archive it with a warning and don't make a point of advertising those models.
I liked this review, thanks!
|
09-20-11 02:27am
|
Reply
22
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
from Capn:
Whilst the regular addition of video has held a little more appeal than I thought it would, it was almost inevitable it was going to increase costs.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-07-11 09:09am
|
Reply
23
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(BradlyH's Reply)
If it were just a minor thing, I wouldn't have even mentioned it. It is enough to bear mentioning.
I usually keep my role to that of a consumer, and I while I could have tried contacting the webmaster about it, I didn't.
Sure, what I've done doesn't solve the problem, but it points out the problem to other consumers, which is my purpose here.
And the problem really isn't errors, it's what causes errors, which is carelessness. And I'm not here to provide parenting services to webmasters of sites to which I've subscribed. ;)
|
09-07-11 01:09am
|
Reply
24
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
from otoh:
That's a shame - as you say, the price was definitely a draw here. Not to belittle the work, it's fun and quirky - but not quite niche enough to demand the same price as other sites.
Still, I may drop by there again sometime, I do really like some of the models.
|
09-07-11 12:42am
|
Reply
25
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from otoh:
(BradlyH's Reply)
Aha, yes, it is billed by CCBill, so at least it's easy to cancel. Can't explain the pricing model though; cheaper to just cancel and resubscribe than to stay subscribed.
This is one of those sites that I put up with the shortcomings of for the quality of the material, it's fairly unique; but one subscription is enough for a while! Might visit again in a year.
|
08-25-11 12:34am
|
