Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : martinlongbow (0)  

Feedback:   All (50)  |   Reviews (0)  |   Comments (22)  |   Replies (28)

Other:   Replies Received (47)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #4 from gaypornolover: (martinlongbow's Reply)

I expect it'll keep growing if you keep joining that many porn sites!

08-01-13  01:18pm

Reply
2
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from Ed Freiland:

Hello Guys,

Here's Ed from 21Sextury. Thank you for your feedback, it's really useful for us to see our customer's needs.
We're working hard to produce fresh scenes with the most beautiful models in wide range of niches, but of course we can't satisfy all special needs.
It's true, our Networks has channels without recent updates but you can be sure that we're eager to show you more and more scenes on our most popular sites. Your satisfaction is really important so we're trying to find new directions as well. For example we introduced a brand new network called 21Naturals which will have more and more channels as well.

Thanks again for your valuable feedback!

Kind regards,
Ed


08-07-13  12:51am

Reply
3
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from thirstyfish:

I recently canceled after six months on 21Sextury. The women are usually quite good looking and the photography, lighting and sets are generally very good.

As Pat mentions: many of the scenes seem pretty much the same. It's as if 21S has 20 (or so) canned scenarios and most of the scenes are based on those scenarios.

Shortly after joining I did a little analysis: of the 21 sites (on 21Sextury), 10 of them were no longer updating and of the 18 bonus sites, 16 were no longer updating. I think 21S added a new bonus site: 'The Best Of' which consists of compilations.

I'm guessing the decline in volume and quality is happening on many sites - not just 21S. The European and US economies are still in bad shape, there seems to be a renewed 'war on porn', and the proliferation of 'free' tube sites doesn't help matters either.

These factors probably drive producers and directors to compete based on imitation and cost (rather than originality and quality).


08-01-13  07:36pm

Reply
4
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from pat362:

They still have some gorgeous performers but the number of new girls as seriously dropped in the last couple of years but that has nothing to do with 21Sextury. It's a question of economics and one of their primary source for talent makes it really hard for girls to work in porn. The quality of the finish product is also affected by the two above reasons.

I had a long term membership that I let go last year and I haven't joined since then. I still visit at least once a week and I may join in the future but I know I won't be downloading all that many scenes since there is way too much duplication now and not that much that I care to watch over and over.


07-27-13  08:53am

Reply
5
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from Sandstone:

Heya,

If you're coming through an affiliate discount offer, you won't see anything else but that offer (and it is usually a monthly discount). It could happen that your browser saves the information... to see the original offer, delete all cookies for the given sites and check the sign-up page that way. It could work.


01-14-11  07:36am

Reply
6
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from PinkPanther:

If you click on the TBP link, they are only offering the monthly join, with a decreasing rate of payment - however from the TBP link, you start off paying $10 less for that first month than you otherwise would.

If you don't go through the TBP link you will be offered a choice of the monthly join with a decreasing rate starting at $29.95 for the first month - or an annual membership.

So if you're thinking it's worth it to join for a year, then don't click on the TBP link. If you want the best monthly join price, click on the TBP link.


01-12-11  05:47pm

Reply
7
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from BadMrFrosty:

I just logged in and it popped up a special offer for a annual membership so they do offer them.

01-12-11  08:30am

Reply
8
Visit Anal Sex HDV

Anal Sex HDV
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from Khan:

spot checking, I see an update for 11th December 2013 for HD content.

They show "coming soon" updates for the 15th, 16th and 17th of this month.

Hope that helps


12-14-13  09:23am

Reply
9
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from tetros:

Ok, it's not updating anymore, and? Although there are over 100 of movies and it's still the best "anal" site in my eyes. Or which one should be better?

06-11-13  03:07am

Reply
10
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Marcus: (martinlongbow's Reply)

Oh yes, I completely understand that. Make sure you nominate it for a re-review and/or submit a correction. The problem is obviously that there's many hundred sites and sadly adult sites do have a habit of slowing down or stopping updates altogether.

I've only reviewed about 10 sites here, but it seems to be a never-ending job to keep them up-to-date, so can only imagine how difficult it is with all the sites on TBP.

Make sure you review the site here giving the site the score you think, as people do check Porn Users as well as TBP.


03-20-13  11:58pm

Reply
11
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from Roberto281:

I would like to know the answer to your question about compensation to Pornusers.com for site reviews.

03-20-13  09:13pm

Reply
12
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from Marcus:

What review? If you mean the one on The Best Porn, that hasn't been updated since 2009, so I think it's unfair to cry conspiracy. Why not write a review here as that's the point of Porn Users.

03-19-13  11:33pm

Reply
13
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

You might notice that the reviews for those two sites weren't done by the same person. Tastes and ratings do vary from person to person. And I certainly wouldn't quibble over a two point difference.

As was suggested in a reply to your comment about Ass Traffic, why don't you put up reviews of both Brazzers and Reality Kings, with your opinion and what you consider to be a fair scores?


03-20-13  12:05am

Reply
14
Visit Brazzers Reel

Brazzers Reel
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from malikstarks:

The problem with that site is you would really just be better off with a VideoBox membership. Most of the guys that might join that site are probably members at VideoBox or another similar site that has more content.

05-23-11  01:56pm

Reply
15
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from DDFNetwork:

Hi Martin,

Thank you for your honest feedback, please let us react to the concerns you raised.

We are republishing weekly about 4-5 of the best of our older sets, completely reedited and remastered. Compared to the 27 exclusive updates we publish a week, and the fact that the republished sets are remastered, I wouldn't consider this as a downside.

We have a huge archive of scenes, and some of our best material is worth a re-edit and remaster with today's new technologies, also it's worth a revisit, as which we select for these purposes are simply epic scenes, and still they are exclusive. We are also increasing the overall quality of our archives, now closing to 13,000 scenes.

We won't ever republish scenes what reached their Best Before Date, that's for sure, so I hope you forgive us for not communicating the remasters so clear and will find satisfaction in either these, or the 22 brand new and exclusive weekly updates.

Kind regards

Kris
DDF Network Representative


07-25-14  03:55am

Reply
16
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from pat362:

You can add using leased material to the list of things they do that can be considered less than desirable but all of these semi-negative things have to be compared with the fact that they update with about

07-24-14  04:06pm

Reply
17
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from careylowell:

Approximately one-third of DDF Busty is hardcore male/female. Say forty flicks. The rest of the site is solos and girl/girl.

01-16-11  06:57pm

Reply
18
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from RustyJ:

There's lots of good old hardcore content with anal, less lately. It's turning more and more into a non hardcore site. DDF busty has some hardcore with anal but not much.

01-13-11  03:01am

Reply
19
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from exotics4me:

There is quite a bit of anal though I couldn't put a number on it just because there's so much content. Most of the House of Taboo content has anal that I've seen, though it's sometimes women only, anal fingering/dildos, but with the other sites, in the network, I would be confident in saying 30-40% has anal in it. Especially on 1byday.

01-13-11  12:36am

Reply
20
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from BadMrFrosty:

Cant help with DDF Prod but I do know a little about DDF Busty. The focus is of course on breasts but there is also a fair amount of HC and masterbation too. I would guesstimate 15% is hardcore, 75% is solo or lez and 10% softcore.

01-12-11  11:57pm

Reply
21
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (martinlongbow's Reply)

It bills through a biller I'm not familiar with (Zombaio) and I'd guess that this was a cost issue for the site. I checked the cancellation link and it seems straightforward and just like other billers so I'm not anticipating any problems. If I do have a problem I'll let the gang here know, but my silence on the issue will mean there is no problem.

If I do encounter a problem I'd email the webmaster though. He's prompt, courteous and customer oriented so I suspect he could resolve any problem that came up.


08-02-13  08:03am

Reply
22
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from pat362: (martinlongbow's Reply)

There is recycling and than there is excessive recycling. I am a fan of Sarah or at least I was prior to her desire to show rosebuds in every one of her anal scenes but I don't need or want to see her do another EB scene. I think her first 8 were more than enough. In fact I think that five was already more than I needed.

That's not to say that I don't agree with your statement because I do believe it's getting harder to find women willing to go the extreme anal penetration route. In fact I would say that EB is already there now because some of the last performers to have appeared on EB have had only toys in their asses as opposed to fist.


08-20-14  03:42pm

Reply
23
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
REPLY TO #9 from pat362: (martinlongbow's Reply)

I'm not so sure that Sex and Submission or for that matter any of the other Kink sites have cut down on anal as much as they now hire such a wide variety of performers and some of these do not do anal so you know that if they are in any of the Kink sites then there will not be any anal. There have been a few of these on Everything Butt and I can remember one on bound gangbang who did not do anal and both sites by default have to at least include anal. I know the Bound Gangbang scene was not well received and Kink learned that they should never hire non-anal performers for a gang bang. It's somewhat different in the case of EB. If it's a non-anal performer in a two or more women scene then you know she will play the part of the dom who gives but never receives. Those aren't as bad because you still get anal but I usually feel cheated when the scene is advertised as starring a specific performer and she is not the one having anal sex.

I checked the number of anal VS non-anal scenes on S&S and out of the 50 latest scenes. I'd say about half or so are anal. Now out of the non-anal scenes you have 2 with Dani Daniels. She was a mostly g/g only performer until recently and she has always been a non-anal girl. Riley Reid has 2 scenes and she is also a non-anal girl so of course she won't do anal for Kink. Although it would be great to see more anal on S&S. The fact that they can hire some of the above performers is good news.

P.S: The only Kink site that is able to hire a wide variety of women willing to do anal is Everything Butt. They are even able to hire those that have never done anal elsewhere. I think the main reason is because it can be a women only scene and therefore very little danger of getting an STD.


01-11-14  11:47am

Reply
24
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
REPLY TO #7 from pat362: (martinlongbow's Reply)

See I have a different opinion because they almost lost me when they decided to add a guy to the mix. The site was originally solo and g/g only but I guess pressure from fans made them alter the site to add a male to the mix. The reason why I stayed is that most of the videos were shot in such a way that you could satisfy both the people like me who want to see only g/g and the guys that wanted to have males involved in the scene by having the g/g only stuff ahead of the b/g/g stuff later in the video. I know that they have now gone back to a g/g or g/g/g only style and that's too bad for you but great news for me.

Frankly the male is really obsolete in a scene where extreme ass play is involved. Especially when most girls do anal fisting. Frankly Sex and Submission is the site you want if b/g stuff is what you want to see on Kink.


01-04-14  10:27am

Reply
25
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment from pat362:

That is true but unless you only consider that a woman has done anal when a dick has entered her ass then you have to agree that these women have all done anal. When the site first went online. They were mostly doing only solo stuff and then they added another girl to the shoot and then it was always 2 women. I think about 2 years or so ago they added a guy to the shoot. They still had the g/g stuff before and then they would fade out and then comeback with a guy and the 2 women. I don't know if there were too many complaints or if it's just too expensive to add the guy but I have noticed that they have gone back to the g/g only stuff. I actually prefer it that way because most of the women also shoot for sex and submission and you will see their anal cherry get popped on that site often enough.

08-01-13  03:44pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.92 seconds.