| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks for head-ups here - been a member a couple of times - but loooong time ago!
According to the latest PREVIEW there certainly is NOT much updates in vids here - and what I can see from that preview all material is still licensed - and can be found elsewhere...
Once (also some time ago) the Drooler mentioned that this site primarily is for pix sets - guess it's still the case?
Do you plan a review? - if so - look forward to it...
|
11-01-10 07:30am
|
Reply
52
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(bibo's Reply)
I'll always be opposed to download limits but at least in this case they aren't as bad as we originally thought. But that's like being grateful for syphilis because it could have been AIDS instead. 6GB is too low, even for an hourly limit. I'm using a manager but not to queue scenes at NS. But I also have a fiber op connection that runs fast so I can easily hit 6GB in an hour. The strange thing is that I get the same warning that you wrote about (2GB in 12 hours) but the email said differently and the email is accurate about the 6GB. I can't speak for the hour cut-off because I haven't tried at just past an hour.
This is another case of a studio site falling short of what they could be. They have some excellent porn but they don't make it easily accessible.
One thing that we definitely don't disagree about is the need for the site to be more open about the limit. I did find the Terms of Service and I couldn't find anything in there about the limit.
|
05-06-14 05:47pm
|
Reply
53
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(bibo's Reply)
|
05-04-14 12:55pm
|
Reply
54
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(bibo's Reply)
A note has been added to the site's listing
|
05-04-14 12:55pm
|
Reply
55
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(bibo's Reply)
I agree that this site is definitely on the 'do not rejoin' list.
While I can understand why a site MIGHT want to impose a limit having one so low doesn't make any sense. The site offers 1080p videos and downloading just one of those might eat up well over half of your capacity. So what I've got a membership to is a site where I'll only be able to download fewer than 60 scenes. That doesn't seem like a good value.
While it won't do any good I'm planning to email them to express my displeasure. The TBP review says that there are no terms of service on the site so I'm planning to point out that it is unethical to have such a restrictive limit without giving a warning of that. I'll also point out that when I find a site I like I tend to rejoin often. Theoretically I could spend a few hundred dollars on their site over the next few years but with this low limit they've got the only money from me that they will ever get. I hope they see a drop from people joining their site from TBP/PU.
One thing that I'm also confused about is that over at TBP Maggie posted a review on May 3 and only mentions that other users reported a download limit. That makes me wonder if New Sensations gave Maggie a special access and didn't tell her that regular members had a limit imposed. I wonder if the site falsified the access that they gave Maggie and hid this important fact from her. Had I known that the limit was on the full membership too I definitely wouldn't have joined.
|
05-04-14 11:54am
|
Reply
56
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from badandy400:
If you ask me, dont give them another dime. Sites did not need to do this 10 years ago and certainly do not need to do it now. Worst case should just use some throttling during heavy periods. In reality they do this so that you need to pay for many months to get what they have.
Thanks for the very informative post!
|
05-04-14 09:19am
|
Reply
57
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from audrina69:
I just encountered the same issue. I joined with a trial membership(as I did in 2013) and in addition to being limited in downloads, I am unable to access the site. I just sent an email to help@nscash.com .
I am disappointed about the download limit but if access is denied after reaching the download limit, I want a refund. I doubt I'll get it but that's absolutely ridiculous.
One comment on the content and layout of the site....much improved. Male talent is listed now. Scene navigation went from incredibly bad to very user friendly. New Sensations/Digital Sin has always cast amazingly beautiful women. The other changes are welcome and noteworthy.
In addition, I am a big fan of the recent content shift from gonzo to more feature type scenes with characters. I hope this issue is addressed in a reasonable manner because I would seriously consider a monthly subscription if there are no download limits on a full membership and they go back to the discounted price of $14.95.
|
05-04-14 04:17am
|
Reply
58
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
from KET924aab:
Thanks for the review! I'd never heard of them, and looks like a very good site!
|
12-29-12 06:23am
|
Reply
59
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from hodayathink:
(bibo's Reply)
Yup. No one has said how long the contract is supposed to last, but I believe it's been in effect for about the past 3-4 months. She still has scenes she shot for other companies that haven't been released yet, though, so you'll probably still see some of her in other places for the next few months.
|
12-29-12 12:27am
|
Reply
60
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
from hodayathink:
Good review. To add a little bit of info, Holly Michaels is signed an exclusive contract with them a few months ago, which is why she appears so much on the site.
|
12-28-12 07:52pm
|
Reply
61
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
from lk2fireone:
Very nice review. I especially liked the bottom line portion.
|
12-28-12 08:23am
|
Reply
62
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
from rearadmiral:
Holy crap! This looks like a great site! Thanks for reviewing it. I think I'll be signing up here soon.
|
12-28-12 05:17am
|
Reply
63
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from Capn:
All videos here, I take it......No photos?
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-07-11 12:37pm
|
Reply
64
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
You should consider writting this up as a review. Even in its current form its more detailed than a lot of reviews I have read, thumbs up :)
|
04-07-11 03:00am
|
Reply
65
|
Russian Teen Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from Freax Media Gro:
The website is now hosted on a very stable server.
|
04-22-14 03:42am
|
Reply
66
|
She Fucked Up
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment from bibo:
Quick update on this issue:
There is no update on this issue. More than 48 hours after joining the site and writing an email to the support team, I still didnt reveice a reply, let alone solution for my problems. Still not been on the site for a single minute.
Im going to claim a refund via the cc processor now.
|
08-04-13 10:39am
|
Reply
67
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from mike11w:
I agree, POV is a weak way to do a scene. The camera bounces, the focus changes and blurs and most guys can't fuck and film at the same time. One of the biggest shortcomings is that they continually get the camera closer than it will focus, thus blurring the image. I honestly thought that most studios had learned this lesson years ago and quit doing POV. From their point of view it is much cheaper to do a scene, but the results are inferior. Not Team Skeet though.
It's too bad, lots of their models are hot, but if all you see is about 1/3 of her ass, it doesn't matter id the rest of her is hot or not.
|
11-02-14 01:06pm
|
Reply
68
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from marvin:
Hey Bibo;
Appreciate you leaving a comment. Though I disagree; I think we have a wide variety of scenes and are about 50% at pov - rest are normal
Sites that are normal:
Innocenthigh
ExxxtraSmall
TeenCurves
Oyeloca
TeenPies
LustHD
StepSibilings
TIttyAttack
Rubateen
Sites that are POV
Shesnew
Teenslovemoney
POvlife
TeenyBlack
TeensDoporn
HOpe you enjoyed the content!!
|
09-30-14 08:30am
|
Reply
69
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(bibo's Reply)
I mean this particular site.
Others I have used OK.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-13-13 04:20am
|
Reply
70
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hodayathink:
(bibo's Reply)
No. Older videos have a 1080p option, and newer ones have a 720p and 1080p option.
|
01-28-13 09:33am
|
Reply
71
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from jook:
(bibo's Reply)
I'm just going by my limited experience and only with one site on the network, the Asian site. The videos aren't dated but I'm guessing from your comments that they're old. The latest ones, or at least the ones listed first, were 540p or less.
The quality comment was certainly subjective. One man's junk is another man's treasure.
But yeah, I did a trial on both sites, on Bang because of an inadvertent oversight on a cross-check, and there was no access to all sites on videosz. There are only 3 sites on Bang. It was the opposite on videosz although the names of the genres of the Bang sites were different.
|
12-01-16 12:02pm
|
Reply
72
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jook:
(bibo's Reply)
I was looking all over for info about bang.com. I found out about it when the pre-cross check devils on Team Skeet hooked me into a trial. I guess I was looking for info in the wrong places.
I downloaded a few videos and was intrigued. I had no idea that they were affiliated with videosz until I was pointed to these comments. Bibo, I think it's the opposite of what you said - joining videosz gives one access to bang.com plus lots more. Joining bang.com only gives access to bang, though I could be mistaken.
Anyway, this site is not worth the bother for the simple reason the quality is mostly not up to snuff, at least the videos I encountered. Downloads were often only 540p or less. On the other hand, It's quite a weird site offering very diverse genres. Then again, I don't think the videos offered anything different than the other bazillion sites.
|
12-01-16 04:10am
|
Reply
73
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from standard:
(bibo's Reply)
Ah, I see. Yes, I was looking at the previews of bang.com, and not the "bang originals" material you have click to get to on bang.com.
So is bang.com just a (partial?) clone site of videosz with 100-200 or so original clips leftover from an acquisition by the videosz company?
|
11-17-16 08:37am
|
Reply
74
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from standard:
FWIW, I'm seeing a lot of what looks like overlapping material from Tainster sites (saw some very distinct slimewave, Party Hardcore, some Bimaxx, and some of their clothing-fetish material). I'm fairly sure I saw some content from clubseventeen.com, too. I think they're associated with Tainster somehow, so that sort of makes sense.
I'll likely join videosz in the next six months, so I'll try to remember to look closer once I'm there.
|
11-12-16 09:07am
|
Reply
75
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
The casting stuff is exclusive to Bang.com? All the scenes that I searched seemed to just be duplicates between the sites but I didn't spend a lot of time searching.
|
11-09-16 06:09am
|
