| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Penthouse
(1)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from cjd2004:
From the video playback page on the Penthouse site:
"If you have a pair of red/cyan 3d glasses select "red/cyan" from the menu.
For those without glasses you can try the cross-eyed or parallel views where you use your eyes to focus in front of or behind the video and align the two images in your field of view.
Members with a 3D enabled computer system can download the 3D version for playback on their system."
Also it seems that 3D versions are only SD.
|
02-17-13 07:48pm
|
Reply
2
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from fuzzyham:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Just tried it and it seemed to work ok for me. I started one video and made sure it was running. I then queued up a second video and made sure it was not running. When the first video finished (elapse time approx 20 minutes), the second video started up right away.
In the Network tab of the DownThemAll preferences, my settings are:
Concurrent Downloads - set to 1 (Set this way just for the test)
Automatic retries - set to 5 min (I think this is the default)
Max. Retries - set to 10 (set this way for the test)
Couldn't find much in the way of help on-line for these settings, but what may be happening is this: If your auto-retries and max-retries expire before the first video ends, it may not start the second video. Don't know how long it takes you to download a video but try setting those 2 switches so they exceed that time frame. Also, there is a menu option (and hot-key combo) to force start a video, which may be another option (just right-click the video you want to start). I may have time to test my theory but not for a while, so give what I suggest a try and let me know.
|
01-03-13 06:21am
|
Reply
3
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from fuzzyham:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
If by queuing you mean setting them up so that when one finishes the next one starts, I've never tried this. I usually do one at a time. However, if I start one, then start another, then they will run concurrently without problems. I'm using a FireFox add-in called DownThemAll! Works great. I'll try the queue thing sometime and let you know.
Happy New Year.
|
01-01-13 07:27am
|
Reply
4
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from fuzzyham:
From a value-per-dollar perspective, this is one of my favorite sites. I love the videos. Well shot and the girls look comfortable and relaxed and really seem to be enjoying themselves. The pics are good from a quality perspective but I don't like the format the thumbnails are presented in. I also don't like that the pics and videos are mixed together and are not in date order when you look at a models portfolio. I do like that when I emailed them to suggest some layout changes that they replied the next day saying that they would investigate. Nothing happened, so I'm not sure they really took a serious look but at least they responded.
I always download from this site using FireFox with a download manager and have never had any problems.
|
12-31-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
5
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Many thanks for the reply - I was indeed speaking of the very same Miss Mosh. She is my absolute favourite model - the only one I really specifically follow (even though I know she only does very softcore images) - so this site has gone up a notch or two.
|
12-14-12 03:29am
|
Reply
6
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for the review on this site which is sort of on my radar - it's especially good to know that it's not quite a softcore (some may say insipid) as eg Met Art. I'm also tempted here because I think there are some sets of Mosh, one of my favourite models - if you are still a member, can you check how many? Thanks!
|
12-12-12 10:14pm
|
Reply
7
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Capn:
Not many videos is not a con for photo folk ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
8
|
Nubiles
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Nubiles Captain:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
I am working on that one right now. They are in the middle of changing some administration on theire side around so as soon as they finish it, I will push to get it done.
|
12-12-12 01:46pm
|
Reply
9
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from gaypornolover:
Very good first review have added you to Trust List and hope you stick around!
|
12-03-12 03:32pm
|
Reply
10
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
Really nice review keep up the good work.
|
12-03-12 12:56pm
|
Reply
11
|
Digital Desire
(4)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from tangub:
Good review Hooliganzo, can't really disagree with anything you wrote there. Personally I love their style of photography with the natural light and it's a site i'm likely to return to time and time again as long as it stays at the great value for money price of $10.
|
12-02-12 01:43am
|
Reply
12
|
Twistys
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Thanks Hooliganzo, for a great reply. It works as a "bottom line" commentary to your review.
I have relatively minor issues with the site's search function by criteria; for example, the cup sizes are not accurate, there is no search by natural/enhanced but there is a search by state (who really cares about state?), no search by soft core/hard core, no search by solo vs. G/G or B/G, etc.
I also give it an uptick for dating everything no matter how old, a clear indication of original content and a halfway decent discussion forum and a responsive webmaster who tries to be responsive to most comments.
|
10-15-12 10:25pm
|
Reply
13
|
Twistys
(7)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
You gave this site a high rating would you be able to share more of why you thought it was a high rating ?
Thanks
CT
|
10-11-12 01:18pm
|
Reply
14
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
Your rating on Twistys and this site were far apart.
Did you base your very low rating on the fact the content is no longer updated ?
As over all it seemed you liked the site just not the content limits but praised it for being worth a one time of 10.00 sorry the review kinda confused me a bit.
|
10-11-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
15
|
Karup's PC
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monty4321:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
thanks guys this was of great help.
|
10-31-11 03:11pm
|
