Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Comment
from Victorycreed:
Yeah, I've seen those when I canceled a membership to one of the sites. Brazzers offered it. Also, I've been getting emails from Reality Kings that offer an exceptional discount as well.
|
09-13-10 09:46pm
|
Reply
2
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from petefountain:
I have two major frustrations with this site. The first, mentioned in this review, is the pain of downloading. I did a statical analysis and found that I got the 403 forbidden message 56 % of the time when I tried to download a video. Once a link fails, however, the failure rate was 100 % until I switched pages, found a link that did work, and then returned to the original link. What a waste of time! No response from customer service. I tried multiple computers and web browsers - same problem.
The second complaint that I have which goes against every other review is that I do not find the scenes that hot. They have 2000+ women porn stars and lots of scenes, but the sex is formula porn with virtually no kissing and no internal cum shots even though no condoms are used. I find very little communication between the couples. The site should be named "whores at work". Their attempt to turn the scenes into "fantasies" did not work for me. Even though the site is highly rated, I will be going elsewhere.
|
04-08-10 01:37am
|
Reply
3
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from messmer:
When I was a member only recently I found the fantasies entirely too repetitious and they had way too many models with inflated breasts and therefore would not rate NA very highly. But on the other hand I found them technically quite good and never ran into your kind of problem. The live shows were also a novelty in their favor so I really think your score is unrealistic. But all things being subjective .......
|
04-03-10 10:14am
|
Reply
4
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from Cybertoad:
I would have to agree, that the site in my opinion was better then a 50's more in the 80's for me.
|
04-01-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
5
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from Monahan:
I'm with Badandy on this.
I've been a member for a year now and am very happy with the site. Very fast download speeds, great quality videos, a lot of variety and plenty of imagination that sets the site apart from the Brazzers/Bang Brothers kind of sites.
Scoring a site is a subjective process, of course, but in my view this site is at least an 85 and probably is worth a lot more if cost is added as a consideration.
|
04-01-10 10:00am
|
Reply
6
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from badandy400:
I never had issues with their site. You seem to have an awful lot of pros in there to give it a 51, or a 20% as you say. Did you try to get a hold of their customer service? Did you try clearing all your cookies, brownies, and other baked goods?
|
03-30-10 05:49pm
|
Reply
7
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
from tangub:
I couldn't agree more with you. Having to score a really bad site 50 out of 100 makes it sound like it's a half decent site.
|
03-30-10 03:27am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 1.97 seconds.
|
|
