| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Layered Nylons
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from OnlyAllSites:
Thank you for a very detailed review.
Layered nylons is continuing to grow and we are committed to adding more and more content to the site!
Please let us know if you have any further questions.
|
05-22-13 10:58pm
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from aztec1152:
This WAS my favorite site on the web. Totally consistent. Not so much anymore. If anyone is reading this from 21sextury--go back!!! The current site is a dud. Horrible design all the way around. I don't even like how they've ranked the content. 21naturals, 21extreme, whatever. I'm paying good money--give me the content. I feel nickeled and dimed.
This website needs to be reviewed again and downgraded.
|
05-13-13 08:53pm
|
Reply
3
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from aztec1152:
It's not often that a successful website takes all the best of their old design and throws it all away. 21sextury has done that. What were they thinking??? The site is totally NOT user friendly anymore!!!
|
05-13-13 08:51pm
|
Reply
4
|
Teen Dreams
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
Your suspicions were well justified, my friend!
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-02-13 08:56am
|
Reply
5
|
Melina.com
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for another great review, tangub :) This had long been on my list due to the diversity of models; but it is a shame that diversity doesn't extend to age. I certainly don't mind the 18-21 group, but would get bored if the whole site was centred on it. Still, one to keep an eye on!
|
04-30-13 05:13pm
|
Reply
6
|
Melina.com
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from otoh:
Hi tangub - thanks for the tip here. This is a site on my list - the broad range of models they seem to have is quite appealing and some of the sets look fun. But it seems like the kind of site that would have somewhat dull videos anyway (?) so the lack thereof wouldn't be a deal-breaker. Either way, look forward to your review!
|
04-28-13 02:26pm
|
Reply
7
|
88 Square
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from Khan:
I've had an editor spot check and the best we can tell (from random checking) zip files ARE available for image files.
We'll try to get the info in the latest review updated.
Thx
|
04-20-13 07:23am
|
Reply
8
|
Love UK Glamour Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
Sounds like a site coding issue.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-19-13 04:23pm
|
Reply
9
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Crispin:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback and the advice, Tangub. I appreciate your giving me the positive Trust rating.
Hopefully I won't have to give any more bad reviews!
|
04-19-13 02:23pm
|
Reply
10
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from williamj:
(tangub's Reply)
well worth a 30 day try, downloads are fast and plenty of good pics and the bonus sites are fun theme too. Lots of pretty girls.
|
04-17-13 11:07am
|
Reply
11
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wetandpuffy:
(tangub's Reply)
Thank you for the kind compliment,
I pride myself on the work I shoot so Im happy you are happy :)
|
04-17-13 02:54am
|
Reply
12
|
Love UK Glamour Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from Mackenzie Model:
Can I add that you can actually download everything off the site including videos!
I am confused as to why right click 'Save as' eludes some people?!
In Google chrome it actually downloads the video automatically when you click on it rather than streaming.
|
04-15-13 07:20am
|
Reply
13
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
Sites like that etc will always have zips sets because their models are paid models that are not exclusive and available in several sites. With most multi model sites though - it's bought content from a photographer that sells X amount of licenses to anyone buying. Zips don't matter because there is no girl to become sad or feel exposed when her content is being traded for free.
I respect you love zips and they matter to you and others as well but that doesn't change the fact that we don't offer them, and never will, regardless of how many people are upset. It's our site, not theirs. If you were a nude model online, you'd feel *very different* on the topic, I can assure you.
Often, customers don't grasp how things are run behind the curtain. You see tits and ass and assume the ladies have no feelings or thoughts on things. This is where Bella is very different from almost every network out there because we treat the ladies like ladies and they make their own decisions. (we don't make them for them) We're not going to zip hotos and have tons of free video content for tube sites like many others do when what it translates to is the model feeling more exposed because she's being given away and traded on boards for free (thanks to zips being downloaded and posted from no-moral members that feel the need for a ^ 5 is more important than respecting a model's rights). We don't put out either (zips or free video samples) and the model doesn't get traded the same way as those sites that do have those things.
Guess what else not having zips everywhere does? it keeps her relevant and in high demand. If anyone can get Bryci on any number of multi model sites - is she as popular as if she's not everywhere? Penthouse is the only place she's had content published, I photographed her for Penthouse magazine last year (Oct 2012 issue).
Photos matter, as I said.
Please look up the word "context". :) You're not quoting me completely there are you? I said the majority of people chose videos over photos. Surveys done here in PU show this as well, look them up. We had our own surveys done and they told us the same thing, 4 our of 5 people rank videos as more important but this doesn't mean we're stopping doing photos. As I said before where you misquoted me, photos do matter - but videos matter more.
But hey, thanks for staying on context and posting an ad for another site in a Bryci review. Very classy of you, indeed.
|
04-14-13 12:40pm
|
Reply
14
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
I never created the profile saying United States and no apologies necessary. :)
I respect that regional bothers you, but again - ccbill sets those rates based on market flux to protect the webbies from assorted fees that occur when we get chargebacks, fraud etc.
A shame we can't make everyone happy, some people just need to be heard. So sorry if I wasn't hearing you. I know that's frustrating when that happens.
|
04-13-13 03:18pm
|
Reply
15
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
Why can't people read? Seriously. All you're doing is going in circles. What I said to Capn, applies here as well.
I'm not a US based website.
I have already covered why we have regional, what regional is and why others use it. I have pointed out to you that we're not CCbill and we don't set the rates. I have pointed out that ALL BANKS WORLDWIDE buy into market fluctuations and adjust their rates accordingly.
If you have an issue with the way CCBill sets things, call CCBill. I am not CCBill.
|
04-13-13 02:58pm
|
Reply
16
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
Not sure if you're aware of this - but we (the sites) don't set the rates. CCbill sets the rates based upon bank rates and fluctuations in bank rates that occur daily/weekly. The rate changes as the market changes. I am not sure how often they modify things, again, we are not ccbill.
CCbills' own explanation on their site:
"Because the market fluctuates daily, we update the CCBill Recommended Ratios on a regular basis. If you click the Accept Regional Pricing button below you are accepting today's CCBill Recommended Ratios"
I view it like this -
If you have a dollar bill from America, and you go to Canada or Spain - is it still worth a dollar? No. Why not? Market fluctuation. Perhaps in the USA your dollar is worth a dollar, but in another country, it might be worth more, or less. Regional pricing accounts for the averages and sets them accordingly.
|
04-13-13 12:34pm
|
Reply
17
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
I'm not sure if you read what I said or if you took it our of context etc. Photos are important, but to the majority of users, they are not as important as videos are.
To the average guy, when he goes to fap - does he use a photo or two or videos? Obviously different for everyone but survey says... videos.
That is not my personal opinion, that is fact based on surveys we've done, other sites have done, even PU has done int he past. Videos are more important, but that doesn't mean photos are not important. They are and always will be. That's why we still create them and more to the point, create them at higher resolution than any other site out there in our niche. :)
|
04-11-13 03:44pm
|
Reply
18
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
It is because they have got away with charging them a modest extra rip with the majority of folk . Now they are trying it on to see how much the market will bear.
If more folk had baulked at it & made a stand as I & a few others have done, we would not be in this situation!
If I see any ' regional pricing ' I'm gone... for good!
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-11-13 01:15pm
|
Reply
19
|
Bryci
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from JamesDavid:
(tangub's Reply)
We offered zips for a three week time period when we first started in Feb 2009. By March we had removed the zips option and we have never and will never return to it. Zipped photos mean your content is in trader forums for free. I can think of solo model sites that don't offer zipped content, and it's hard to find their content. I can think of solo model sites that offer zips and it's incredibly easy to find their content.
If we offered zips, perhaps we'd get a few more sales initially, but for the headache it'd bring and then out content being all over, sales would drop and it's simply not worth it to us. There will always be pirated pix/vids no matter what the site is, that's part of the industry. If we can slow it down though, we do.
What's funny is we get maybe one email a month asking about zips. It's nowhere near the issue many in here make it out to be. Nobody really cares that much about photos anymore, videos are more important to our user base according to 4 out of 5 people.
|
04-11-13 12:43pm
|
Reply
20
|
Hairy Twatter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(tangub's Reply)
Nice details, tangub. Thanks for the response!
|
04-07-13 05:32am
|
Reply
21
|
Love UK Glamour Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from Marcus:
Urgh, how annoying, and how ridiculous for them to insult members' intelligence. Really hope you can review it.
|
04-02-13 01:06pm
|
Reply
22
|
Wet And Puffy
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from luv lickn clit:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks tangub, I guess I shoulda checked on that before commenting!
|
04-01-13 09:58am
|
Reply
23
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Marcus:
(tangub's Reply)
Urgh, it's exactly as I thought! Thank you for digging a bit deeper. Another site to add to my blacklist.
|
03-29-13 10:00am
|
Reply
24
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from marcdc1:
(tangub's Reply)
I guess my ignorance is showing. See that Bangbros is a big and long lasting company I thought their long tenure meant integrity.
As you're comments point out - I seem to be mistaken.
Thanks for your help and thoughts.
|
03-29-13 08:45am
|
Reply
25
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(tangub's Reply)
that's even stranger. the exact url I was directed to is: http://www.assparade.com/t7/?prg=pps&...&cmp=warningpage
I thought it was rather strange that access from the main site had different behavior then the direct url.
Do you see the same thing when you go to the above url?
|
03-29-13 07:10am
|
