Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3068)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (240)  |   Replies (2712)

Other:   Replies Received (1469)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 2712 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

A good search function is like the transporter room in Star Trek. It will get you there a lot faster than navigating through the wild open spaces, of which there are often many.

06-30-15  04:04pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Skippy said it well, and I agree with Monahan about the "whole arm or leg or neck" problem. Monique Alexander, for example, has clearly overdone it. I still think she's hot, but I've had to take the bad with the good.

And maybe the girls thinking that they are their own canvas is where the whole problem got its start.


06-27-15  01:17am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Breast implants are one of the hazards of being a porn fan. You see so many beautiful girls with natural charms that go to ruin. I'm telling you: It's hard to take every time it happens.

06-25-15  08:08pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Diversity (non-whiteness, in other words) in porn is treated as "special," whether the performer is Asian, black, Latina, or whatever floats your boat "correctly." Production companies point out that so and so is in one of those groups. Whether this compensates for the inequality of representation is up to you.

One thing that still goes on is stereotyping, such as the Latina maid (Veronica Rodriguez and Alexa Tomas, for example) and the English-challenged Asian girl with "Love you long time" and shit like that.

Of course, this is only about the women. There are more black studs than there used to be, but aside from the "interracial" aspect being made into a selling point, they are pretty much there for kinetic purposes, as are the white guys.


06-19-15  04:59am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

The majority vote came in: solo.

06-01-15  03:38pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I agree with the two PUer's above. At first I thought that it depends on the shoot, but that would complicate the question unnecessarily.

When I want to revive an old shoot, I don't want to sign up (pay) and then look for what's not there.

Accident deletion is just one reason. Hard drive failure is another. And yet another is upgrading -- getting that higher quality scene now that your hardware is asking for it.


05-26-15  03:11pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

This is the quantitative aspect -- not as important as the qualitative one.

04-30-15  03:49pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

pat362 said it

04-25-15  07:48am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Downloads get a thorough picking through and tossing out of "off" pics. Then it's on to the final destination folders, which could be in one of three different hard drives now. I said "drives" and "folders" because I backup as I file.

04-22-15  04:32pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

The smart approach from the European perspective would be to lower prices enough that they could be competitive, but still have a greater margin of profit than they did before the devaluation of the Euro.

04-19-15  03:54am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, in all ways. The thumbnail should show all of what you will see, and it should link to the actual photo.

Otherwise, you might not know that the model is smaller in the photo than the thumb shows; I've seen this before and it's irritating. Or you can't see the bottom half of a portrait oriented photo; same comment.

Really, as no-brainers go, this one is definitely in the top 3. But some people would rather listen to their own excuses.


04-11-15  02:40am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't notice the flaws -- unless they're there. "Skin flaws" fits the question, but there are many kinds, some inconsequential and some not. It doesn't happen often, but I've been grossed out by the details of a few girls and really changed my mind about them once they were under the HD macroscope.

And I'm not into porn for "realism." It's the stuff of fantasy. Surgical scars from tit jobs, pimply butts, and some birth marks are sometimes just too real to take.


04-09-15  04:39pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, I don't mix my Starbucks with fuck stars. What if someone saw?

04-08-15  04:27pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Whatever works with the rest of what she's wearing. I don't know many terms for female footwear, but if it's tasteful, that's all I could ask for.

04-05-15  09:48am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think they're bs, so where's the surprise?

04-02-15  07:01pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't have a laptop with a 21-inch screen. That one's for "yo mama."

03-31-15  03:13pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always hear calliope music playing in the background when I see fisting content, along with peeing, object insertions, and elephants standing on their hind legs with balls wrapped around their trunks.

03-26-15  01:10pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of exotics4me's Reply

No, I was thinking of something less complicated, like "Big Alien Dick." After all, we already have "BBC."

03-20-15  12:40pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Funny, I also first wondered if the space aliens might be sexually attractive. Why reject them if they can be incorporated into some good porn? And there would be new acronyms like "BAD."

Go ahead. Guess! ;)


03-16-15  06:12pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, because I don't know what it means to be an average porn surfer.

03-14-15  01:31am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends. And on what? I can't say. Sometimes I just don't care about it, and sometimes I really do.

03-08-15  08:00am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't think of my personal budget as the benchmark criteria for determining the overvaluation of pornography. But then, who knows? ;)

03-05-15  01:14am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Pretty much the same as WittyGuy

03-01-15  04:51am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Ain't never done that.

02-27-15  10:27am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It always depends. I've seen a bit of goofiness for the first time from certain models and found it attractive, but with others, it's not so much. And if it's with food, forget it. Well, probably.

02-25-15  03:17pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2712 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.84 seconds.