Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3009)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2656)

Other:   Replies Received (1460)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 2656 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Same as LPee23; would join once to get the archived stuff. I've done it before.

11-22-14  10:13am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Might be interesting to see the responses to a poll using only terabytes as the unit of measure. I've crossed the 4TB mark, for example.

11-16-14  05:58am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Never, never, never! People would think I was some kinda sex maniac.

11-10-14  04:19pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like the starkness of it, once the preliminaries have been checked off. It's great when the camera angles and editing are good, disappointing as hell when they're not.

11-06-14  04:23pm

Reply
5
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

Faves are keepers. Downloads are for getting them. Have been going over some stuff not seen for a while and guess what? MORE faves!

11-05-14  04:02pm

Reply
6
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

That's fair enough. It's not surprising that two people would have different views and tastes--and responses--to the same kind of material.

11-03-14  03:35pm

Reply
7
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Excellent review as it is thoughtfully in-depth and informative.

Personally, however, I'm not one to renew with the site just because I really dislike the way Ryan goes about things. I think that of all male performers I've seen, he's one of the most distracting and visible in the scenes, tossing the girls this way and that in a sexual frenzy. He does live what excessive editing and camera cutting would otherwise do post-production. I just can't enjoy watching that kind of porn.


11-02-14  07:28am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Sometimes I like to watch the "pretext"/beginning and sometimes the foreplay, but I don't watch much of the BJ part. Usually, though, I find exactly where the belly-down backdoor part is first, or the standing backdoor part. The scene will always have one, 'cause I always look through the caps before I decide to download or not.

11-01-14  07:17pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

As far as taste goes, it really hasn't changed since I was a strapping young man. Mostly what has become more refined and narrowed is my knowledge of were to find what I like.

10-26-14  03:14am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I wish there were more softcore material of at least of couple of stars, Whitney Westgate and Natalia Starr. I'll explain.

For one thing, I'm more into photos for softcore. There are "softcore parts" in photosets from Brazzers, Bang Bros., Porn Pros, and similar sites, but they don't do it as well as sites such as ATK Galleria or MetArt. It's just a matter of the style of the shoots.

But it's no big deal.


10-24-14  04:06pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Dick slaps generally don't bother me. They don't happen that much, in my viewing experience anyway. A guy would have to be masochistic to keep doing it a lot. Besides, I doubt that any penis has the ability to do any real harm, such as bruises or fractures.

So it's the sight of a guy smacking a girl somewhere with his member that must turn some people off. In the face (not the mouth amid oral sex) turns me off, but it's nothing compared to throat grabbing and putting a foot on the girl's face. That's what really chills my blood.


10-19-14  06:05am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

78.1 is where mine stands. Anything above that, therefore, should be considered a compliment.

10-18-14  12:55am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

When it's out of synch, it gives a new twist to "What's Up Tiger Lily?" But that's OK; I usually watch 'em pre-talkies.

10-13-14  07:45am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wonder what the purpose of the question is. Is it an inquiry that might lead to a policy of some sort, should the majority seem to be in favor of one? I'm just wondering.

Sometimes I mind if the topic has been brought up before. I ask, "Why start a new thread?" But it's not a big deal. I'll go whatever way things go as far as the forum is concerned.


10-11-14  11:59am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I click. Therefore, it is.

Usually.


10-09-14  06:50pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the cameraman really has something worthwhile to say, then fine. It just hasn't been my experience.

10-07-14  11:27am

Reply
17
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Vito's Comment

I'm a current member. Now they just give the file numbers without the size, such as 4287001, 4287002, etc. I like this better myself because I can replace a smaller-sized pic with a larger one with a simple drag-and-replace.

But everyone has their own preference for file naming.

The folder names are as Tangub said.


10-06-14  04:54pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with Denner on the "full body visions," meaning, I think, from the thigh up (or foward). Some of the scenes of Anjelica at 18only and Wowgirls/porn come to mind. They're pretty much done right.

A some brief closeups of the action are good, but not more than a few at 3 seconds or so each. And I mean the action with the girl in focus -- not some man ass and dangleberries taking up most of the view. (I could do that myself with a couple of mirrors -- if I ever had the inclination.)

Multiple camera angels are just fine so long as the scene is set up properly and the editing afterwards isn't done by some idiot who's checking his Twitter account while the closeup of the girl's face keeping playing and playing and playing.


10-05-14  10:39am

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Maybe it would be OK if the women, in turn, called the males things like "bastard," "shorty," "you pud," and "numbnuts," but it would be even better without any pejorative language at all.

Sex doesn't have to get mean.


10-01-14  03:00pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Just when you thought she was only gonna do it with that sweet pussy of hers -- in myriad positions, of course -- whoa! She's takin' it up the can!

Anal is like a waffle sandwich (or a sandwich waffle, if you're already bored with the other one). The marketing aspect of it upstages the act, which really isn't that big of a deal.

So keep that in mind the next time you think about having a Hot Pocket.


09-29-14  04:02pm

Reply
21
Visit Zishy

Zishy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

TBP classifies it first as NN porn (non-nude porn), so I guess that's what it is, like an unopened bag of snacks.

The site preview shows a few shots of what look like nudity, just here and there. Very clever.


09-28-14  12:23pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I wait sometimes for a lower rate, especially if it is really only for a month and not a teaser rate over more than a month.

Sometimes there's a discount offer that just pops up in an email as a nice surprise.

But sometimes I just join if I have pretty good idea of what I'm in for and the regular price isn't over $25 US.


09-25-14  09:18am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

About as much as I enjoy hand-made tits ... not!

09-23-14  07:33pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It almost never does, and when it does, it's only a minor positive effect and is, all things considered, unnecessary.

There have been/are models with small breasts who are very lovely, such as Presley Dawson and Jassie. I'd think of more, but I can't because I don't usually remember models by their tits anyway.


09-21-14  03:01pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nary a one, now and forever.

09-18-14  10:42am


Shown : 1-25 of 2656 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.93 seconds.