| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Just a serious appreciation - am now "hikin'" through this fine site, I have not been to for quite a while - or rather a long time - you saved my day in getting back to some fine material - also material from "the old days"
Thumbs up for this input/comment with a fine offer - and thanks again!!!
|
11-22-12 08:38am
|
Reply
52
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Just got/found the pop-up and the deal....and joined, thanks again, tangub.
But boy, they sure got a new design/navigation - well, I'll get to learn it.
|
11-22-12 08:23am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Never heard of it, so yes: relocate.
Still, I always thought, that - today - responsible actors made sure about diseases - AND - craved some certainty before doing the worse part of risk: anal.
|
11-22-12 07:40am
|
Reply
54
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Fine tip, tangub...but can't find that offer. Not a member now, but was considering...got a link, bro???
|
11-22-12 07:34am
|
Reply
55
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
Ahm - still a rather limited amount of material - and especially vids. Looks fine in general, ok - but I'll put it on hold....and wait for more content.
|
11-22-12 07:30am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It can be done fine - but rarely is. Hope for better times for this niche.
|
11-16-12 08:53am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Can't find words to praise this poll by cybertoad...
Still: I'll go for fully dressed - in most cases. The fantasy in porn is also - to me - to watch a model/girl in her "daily surroundings" - like seeing tight jeans/dress or alike - before the "deal". Some sites can do it - a lot of minuttes/sets with girls removing those clothes slowly....that's also fantasy.
If the site Fuck My Jeans had been made better, far better: that could be it! (as an example).
Bottom Line: Guess a lot PUs could make a site worth while - or at least tell some producers how to do it!
|
11-15-12 07:35am
|
Reply
58
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Yes, realized this new site came up - models and style look fine - will probably for more content...
|
11-14-12 09:04am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, like RustyJ - and there are professionals doing a somewhat fine job - and there are, alas - too many doing a horrible camera job - like: "any fool today can make some porn".
So why not get a poll/thread here: Who makes the best camera-work these days??
|
11-13-12 08:16am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like both Drooler and Capn and more - in the "old" days, I joined what looked like ok, because of the previews..
But as Capn says: "I seldom join anything" - or maybe like: Much less than earlier.
And: mostly some site never heard of before (heard of at TBP/PU)...still: porn is here to stay, so I join some well known sites - now and then - but not because of any review.
|
11-11-12 08:06am
|
Reply
61
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I agree with BMF's entire input.....the vids I have from this site are in fine quality - and nice shoots of "girl-in-jeans" before the act - and some fine/ok bonus sites included, among others Baby Dolls on Fire - with pretty good vids.
And it'd been great with a little more info.....
|
11-05-12 06:22am
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rarely/sometimes - but only/normally when irregularities (NOT fraud) occurs at a site, I sometimes write to the WM. That's our right and the webmasters mostly appreciate the feedback.
|
11-02-12 06:36am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I say Superior....naturally.
Opposed to the somewhat common opinion of we pornusers as the bottom of the "whatever" -can't find the word in English - I consider this place being "inhabited" mostly by people of, if not - only - academic standard - then still people with brains.
I guess we all have seen forums where we run away - screaming.
(Jeeezzz, I would have loved to have been able to write my input here in my native language).
|
10-31-12 06:36am
|
Reply
64
|
Molly's Bedroom
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
No, tangub - not Victoria Divine. The girl in this network with bonus sites are:
Molly
Abigail
Alli
Amber (aka Valentina at MetArt and aka Valia - great)
Anne
Danni
Debbie (new)
Erica (not Fontes)
Irene
Jenny Reid
Kimmy
Lana (still)
Tera (new to me)
Hope that helps.
|
10-30-12 08:00am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
NHL - love hockey and was active in my youth....
But those tv-chanels are fighting here in Europe/Denmark to get the rights...so you'll never know who get to show those games from NHL...a serious bummer.
|
10-29-12 06:56am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think BadMrFrosty said it.....some women/girls do it frequently, some now and then - and then again some rarely...ect.
|
10-24-12 06:04am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nada......
|
10-21-12 05:06am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Guess, Khan had the word:
Regulars.
Called it: "actives".....probably the same in the long run.
And bottom line: Still think it's fine to get some more inputs in this exact way...more "bottom line" from other fellow PUs.
|
10-19-12 09:48am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
If the Capn is right, sure...
In my old, old memory can't recall that word...it was something else, or..
Well, I once participated and it'll give some good insight - especially about the more active PUs - it takes a lot of time to do those, but...get them back....and like Capn, again - have not seen them for a loooong time.
Was there another phrase/name for it -some time back?
|
10-19-12 06:38am
|
Reply
70
|
Molly's Bedroom
(1)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Just ran a fast check on the Lana bonus-site:
Still updating on photosets - and quite a lot in 2012 and earlier - but no vid-update since 2007.
She does not look older at all those new pix-sets, so guess it's like Teendreams (for one) older material, but not earlier released...there are tons of sets with Lana...a little over 120 sets - both hc, solo and a few lez. And it really looks ok in pix style and quality...
|
10-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
71
|
Molly's Bedroom
(1)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Just got a mail from the webmaster, boris...pretty fast, and thanks..
According to Boris they are doing a complete work over of the design ect. - which again according to Boris will take a few days....really good to hear.
To lk2...have not yet been at the bonus sites - will be back shortly...
|
10-17-12 11:20am
|
Reply
72
|
Molly's Bedroom
(1)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
....AND some of the zip files do not work, either....
A mess.
|
10-17-12 07:32am
|
Reply
73
|
Sugar Paradise
(1)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Guess your're right....it was once a place to get some/a few fine exclusive pieces of material ....was wondering a bit about this place, but I'll skip it for now...Thanks!
|
10-17-12 07:21am
|
Reply
74
|
Sugar Paradise
(1)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Fine review, lk2. Was a member long time ago at one of the bonus-sites - and then had this, too - of course. Do they still provide the bonus sites, as said at TBP - you made a review for Pearl Teens last month. So I guess that's so - or?
BTW: I think it's very fine, that we make reviews of each - most important sites - from a network...not all have the same taste, thumbs up, lk2.
|
10-17-12 05:51am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not into shower/bathroom shoots - and there are too many of them.
Outside - for most parts not good and yes: bad lighting...it takes a serious professional cameraman - and a lot are not.
And couch-shoots seems uncomfortable, mostly - the same goes for kitchen shoots.
I prefer bedroom scenes - on and beside the bed with a lot of "standing foreplay" - can you say that in English?
And there are a lot of fine shoots in front of a fireplace on a thick rug....
Nice poll, BTW.
|
10-17-12 05:40am
|
