Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : DigglerFL (17)  

Feedback:   All (44)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (20)

Other:   Replies Received (42)  |   Trust Ratings (25)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of Clement's Reply

Now that I've been on the site awhile I have to reject your answer on the blurry videos. I've seen some of the videos on here on other sites at much higher quailty. What, did you buy lower res CDs than they did? And why are the clip pictures clear but the videos can't get close to that clarity? Clearly they've just been encoded at a lower res, probably for a day when not many people had broadband. You just haven't chosen to re-encode the CDs for modern viewing.

If you're going to use the high number of videos you have as a selling point, keeping them up to date should go hand and hand with that. I don't expect in 2010 to have 3/4 of the videos with 2005 download resolutions.


02-28-10  09:15am

Reply
2
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of james4096's Reply

If you're rating a restaurant and the waitress gets your order wrong and brings you the wrong thing and then tells you "oh, we were out of what you ordered so we gave you something else", do you give the restaurant a good rating because what they brought you wasn't terrible?

No, you give them 1 star. Because you want to get what you ordered; not something else. 50 is the lowest rating. The rating recommendations say "Not Recommended" is 50-59. If it was 1 video that was missing I'd give a higher rating. But there are a lot of them. So you search, find something you want, and then BANG, its "Coming Soon". Its a waste of time as well as annoying.

Its purposeful deceipt. So they get the lowest possible rating. The unavailable videos should be taken out of the index; for both members and would-be members.


02-24-10  04:10am

Reply
3
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of Clement's Reply

Offering a refund so you can continue to deceiver others doesn't seem like a worthy trade off. How about if I eat the $18. and see if you

1) Change your site so it no longer indicates that videos that aren't currently available are available

2) put up the videos in 2 weeks like you indicate they will be.

Then perhaps I'll consider changing my review. In the meantime, everyone who reads this has no idea which videos are available and which aren't by the current way you're doing things.

The argument that they're being re-encoded doesn't satisfy the reasoning behind bogusly indicating that the videos are available before you pay. It should say Coming Soon BEFORE people pay as well as after.

Otherwise you are a crook, no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise.


02-22-10  04:36pm

Reply
4
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Well if they "decided" to scale back on their content, then they need to scale back on their pricing as well. If Mercedes decided to cut back on leather and AC, you'd expect them to adjust their price accordingly.

The value test is not necessarily how good something is, its how good it is compared to what you can get spending your money elsewhere. Dollar for dollar, this site is simply not worth the price, because you can get more and better content elsewhere for less money.


10-05-08  05:12am

Reply
5
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Reply

I'm a professional photographer, and you're obviously some horny dude who has probably never seen a real women naked. So who is incompetent?

You can't download just the photos you want in high resolution. You have to download the entire tarball. Or at least you did when I wasted my money on the site.


05-31-08  08:48am

Reply
6
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Reply

Clearly you know nothing about modeling or photography. The photos are amateurish and the models aren't models because they don't know how to pose. Most of the sets don't have a single quality shot. Its a site for horny losers. 97 implies that it could not be better, which is clearly not the case.

05-17-08  03:14pm

Reply
7
Visit Fling.com

Fling.com
(0)
Reply of stargazinc's Reply

This is clearly a spam "reply". It would be good to have a way to report such things.

03-16-08  08:01am

Reply
8
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Review

Is this a plant? Fess up. 97? Surely you jest.

02-25-08  09:41am

Reply
9
Visit Ox Pass

Ox Pass
(0)
Reply of Bletch's Comment

This is one of my peeves about BangBros in general. All of their "sites" say "access to ALL of our sites". But its just not the case.

02-16-08  07:04am

Reply
10
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of OUMarcus's Comment

I find the "new" sites completely useless. VIP has been part of the "Milfhunter" network for a long time.

12-03-07  06:42am

Reply
11
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of mediafan's Reply

So your argument is that because its better than sites that really, really suck, its a 95? 90s ratings imply the site is the best that it can be. There's no HD or DVD quality content, slow downloads (VERY slow when you reviewed it) and an archaic password scheme. At least read what the ratings mean. A 95 implies that you don't think the site can be improved. The fact that they completely revamped the interface and got more bandwidth AFTER your review implies that even Reality Kings didn't agree with you, or they wouldn't have bothered.

11-21-07  08:57am

Reply
12
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of mediafan's Review

I assume you've never been on any modern porn sites? Giving a site with so many problems a 95 is just plain irresponsible.

11-16-07  05:58am

Reply
13
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Ok, well I "ass"ume he shot digitally, and he used a 1024 save-size or maybe just used a 1 megapixel camera. SLR multi-megapixel cams were mega-bucks until recently. I doubt he shoots with film or a point and shoot.

09-22-07  11:41am

Reply
14
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Its business. Notice they have a special price?

The concept that Matt's "couldn't be better" is patently absurd, so getting 4 90s completely discredits EVERY ONE of TBP's reviews. They should consider what these deal's are doing to the integrity of their site. A good review site MUST be detached from doing business with the sites they are reviewing. While getting special deals for their readers is a good thing, the price they pay: the believability of their reviews, might be a bad financial move in the long run. They should learn a lesson from Rodney.


09-22-07  11:23am

Reply
15
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

what I meant, is that you can't convert 1024 pixel photos to 1600 without stretching them. You can't add detail. So its just not a reasonable expectation. He'd have to reshoot.

09-22-07  10:23am

Reply
16
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

how can he "re-publish" in 1600px? Do you want bigger, blurry pixelated photos?

09-22-07  08:26am

Reply
17
Visit Monsters of Cock

Monsters of Cock
(0)
Reply of uscue's Reply

I wrote them multiple times. Perhaps they've learned from their evil ways, but at the time you only got access to 6 sites and they stated "you get access to all of our sites". So I stand by my review.

08-09-07  07:38pm

Reply
18
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of videobox's Reply

And May's list:

Handjobs
upskirt diaries
Wrestle with the Devil
Dicks and Dildos
Lacta-mania
Chunky on the 4th of July
Ebony Cream Pies
Black Cream Pis
booty quake
thick black and stacked
Dude, where's my dildo


There's an old business adage - decide what you want to be and be the best at it - When you try to cater to everyone you dilute the customer base that made you successful in the first place. I'm sure you know how it affects your bottom line better than I do, but be aware that there are people who want a certain type of content, and they'd rather join a site where they know that the updates will be something that interests them. I cancelled my membership after a week where there were maybe 3 scenes that interested me.

I didn't trash your site. You have a lot of good content. But if only 1/3 of the content is of interest to any given individual, then its certainly worthy of note.


07-17-07  07:32am

Reply
19
Visit Vivid

Vivid
(1)
Reply of nadiencendia's Reply

Its fine to say you like the site, but giving a site with such terrible quality videos a 90 is simply wrong. You've totally ignored something that should be a key criteria. Obviously vivid has the capability to put up high quality videos. They don't do so on purpose. Its not like its some garage dude who can't afford a good camera. The videos aren't just not that good. They are terrible. Its a disgrace.

06-28-07  04:27pm

Reply
20
Visit Vivid

Vivid
(1)
Reply of nadiencendia's Review

I really don't see how you can give a 90 score to this site. If all Vivid content were available in good quaility it might get that score, but its simply not the case. The "new" videos are not good quality either, in fact I found that many of the older videos had better quality. But finding them is nearly impossible. This site is a waste of money unless you're viewing the videos on an ipod.

06-23-07  01:03pm


Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.32 seconds.