Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : hodayathink (18)  

Feedback:   All (324)  |   Reviews (10)  |   Comments (23)  |   Replies (291)

Other:   Replies Received (179)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 291 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of brotherlove's Comment

Let's not short change them on the amount of companies they own. Brazzers, Digital Playground, Reality Kings, Babes, and they run Wicked's network and, I believe, Playboy's TV station as well. They're about as far reaching as they come.

03-15-14  03:52pm

Reply
2
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(1)
Reply of benmar51's Reply

Search around for tutorials on how to download Youtube videos. Most of those tutorials work for most porn sites.

08-20-13  10:24pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Depends on the model and the dye job. Sometimes, it works really well, and sometimes it, well, doesn't.

07-24-13  01:06am

Reply
4
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review

The sad part about all of this is that New Sensations actually does still shoot good content nowadays (if you get the chance, check out their newest DVDs), but they website is just so out of date that it's ridiculous.

07-23-13  07:34pm

Reply
5
Visit College Sugarbabes

College Sugarbabes
(0)
Reply of Carue's Comment

The site also stopped updating like a year ago.

06-26-13  01:11am

Reply
6
Visit Tonight's Girlfriend

Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I agree, actually.

05-27-13  02:27pm

Reply
7
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(5)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I wouldn't go that far (just unsubscribing and not saying anything). I'd find other ways to say what I wanted to that aren't the comments section. Maybe to a general customer service e-mail account, or saying something to them on Twitter. I'd definitely find a way to let them know that I think their content is slipping, but I think you're right that the comment section might not be the best place to do it, specifically when it refers to the talent in the scene.

04-20-13  08:11pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with pretty much everyone else. If there's enough content to make it worth joining to access what's already there, then yes I would.

04-20-13  12:24am

Reply
9
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of Dracula's Comment

Is it still only for people that subscribe for the full year, or are they allowing people who get shorter memberships to get one as well?

04-18-13  01:23pm

Reply
10
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

From what people are saying, what it's about is that billing companies are getting pressure from credit card companies about what sites can and can't do, and one of the things they're supposedly focusing on is sex that could seem non-consensual. And bound sex is on that list of things.

04-18-13  01:19pm

Reply
11
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of Jay G's Comment

They create Hardcore Gangbang specifically because they had to get away from the bound aspect of Bound Gangbangs. The sites don't both update because they're moving away from Bound on purpose and Harcore is its replacement.

04-16-13  03:38pm

Reply
12
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)
Reply of JamesDavid's Reply

I'm not really sure what you're saying is not correct? The feedback loop comment? I do agree with much of the other stuff you said here, though (except the HD thing. 720p is still HD by every definition of the phrase. Hell, technically, 721x481 would be HD). Especially the fact that the customer isn't always right. I've worked in retail for way too long to actually believe that. I think as long as it's fairly obvious that you're primarily a video site with photos also, you're not doing anything at all wrong.

Also, if you check my reviews, I'm a video guy. Always have been, always will be. So your sites lack of zip files wouldn't bother me at all. Without really knowing much about your sites/network, I don't' know whether I would join or not (I've never joined a single model site/network yet), but this wouldn't be an issue that persuades me either way.


04-16-13  12:34am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like my photos to be real, and my videos to be fantasy. So I don't mind flaws in the model in photos.

04-15-13  05:20pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Yeah, that was easily the best fisting scene I've ever seen.

Though in general, I agree that it's done for the spectacle of it, and not because it's something that's particularly arousing to the person getting fisted.


04-13-13  12:26pm

Reply
15
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

The point of taking photos doesn't really have to be to allow collectors to download them. If nothing else, photos make for much better promotional material than videos. They're much easier to distribute freely (a fact that pirates take advantage of), and you can use them as part of your website design (especially on the front page of the site). Not to mention the ability to use them to make advertisements with (from banner ads to preview pages). The truth is that the majority of video sites that make their own exclusive content (as opposed to licensing it from someone else) shoot at least some photos to go along with it, and there's a reason for that.

04-13-13  11:57am

Reply
16
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

Makes perfect sense once you realize it's a self-fulfilling prophecy/feedback loop. The policy on photos means that people who prefer photos to videos aren't going to join in the first place, so when they survey their members on whether they prefer videos or photos, their members are going to overwhelming say videos.

Basically, it sounds like the photos on the site are more about people who like just looking at them as opposed to people who like collecting them. I don't really see a problem with that as long as you can know that ahead of time.


04-13-13  01:30am

Reply
17
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, the tech is there at this point, it's just that no one has fully put it all together, and then there's the price factor.

04-08-13  04:30pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Don't we all?

04-08-13  04:29pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Only if you tell it to.

04-08-13  06:42am

Reply
20
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(7)
Reply of Buckhead's Review

They do have 1080 on every video that's in HD. The bitrate isn't as high as some people would like, but it's there.

Other than that, I do agree with your basic points.


04-07-13  11:06pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I agree with this. It's possible (but pretty expensive) to put, for lack of a better word, moving fuckable parts on a life-sized doll right now. The only thing it's missing is some kind of AI/programming to control the parts (which shouldn't take long). Once someone does that, it's just about the cost coming down.

04-07-13  10:27pm

Reply
22
Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
(1)
Reply of Belthazar's Reply

Yeah, it looks like they've lowered it again to the point of being worthless now. Which sucks.

04-07-13  09:34pm

Reply
23
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

If the special were a few dollars lower, I'd actually consider it anyway. Mainly because there not being any download links doesn't mean you can't actually download scenes from the site, if you're resourceful enough.

04-01-13  05:52pm

Reply
24
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Reply

I'm looking at it right now (I can still log in from an old membership) and I see two videos every day for the past week.

And to answer your question: I think when reviewing a site you should include all scenes that the site gives you access to.


03-24-13  10:13am

Reply
25
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Review

I believe that the two videos a day include the solo masturbation videos. If you're only counting boy/girl and girl/girl videos, then it would be 2 a week (one b/g for Twisty's Hard, one g/g for When Girls Play).

03-24-13  09:44am


Shown : 1-25 of 291 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.24 seconds.