Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Dorsai6 (0)  

Feedback:   All (18)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (8)

Other:   Replies Received (7)  |   Trust Ratings (5)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Playboy Girls

Playboy Girls
(1)
Reply of ex1am's Comment

At present, they want to charge extra for Playboy Girls after you have joined Playboy Plus. The one-time fee is quite high for a "dead" site.

04-22-14  11:01am

Reply
2
Visit VirtuaGirl

VirtuaGirl
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Over the past 6 months, I've earned a variety of free credits and other upgrades. All have been delivered on time and as promised. I agree that tech support leaves a lot to be desired.

04-19-14  09:00am

Reply
3
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(3)
Reply of Dorsai6's Comment

One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.

07-08-13  08:02pm

Reply
4
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(3)
Reply of Dorsai6's Comment

It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.

07-07-13  03:09pm

Reply
5
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Dorsai6's Reply

This is to update my previous comment. I was not locked out at 177 downloads. It seems they have occasional server interruptions that I thought was a lock-out. I've found that when I get a "Server Not Found" message, if I try again in a few minutes I'll get through. However, there is a 300 zip per day limit as stated in their terms of service and that is enforced.

05-23-13  03:07pm

Reply
6
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Horndog's Comment

The problem is still there. I joined yesterday. They say there is a daily limit of 300 zips or 20GB. I downloaded 177 zips (7GB) and found myself locked out. On the plus side many of the models are outstanding.

05-21-13  08:21am

Reply
7
Visit House Of Gord

House Of Gord
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

There is a lot of content on the site. For the past two years nearly all the videos have been 1280 X 720. There are about 100 sets of that size. Most of these video sets have 2 or 3 parts. (See to full site review here.) From 2007 thru 2010 most of the sets were 640 X 480. Earlier sets are even smaller.

Overall, I suggest that you join the site for one month and judge for yourself. I think you'll find enough to make at least one month's membership worthwhile. The content if varied. I found some of the sets very attractive and others were, for me, of no interest at all.


12-29-12  10:02am

Reply
8
Visit Restrained Elegance

Restrained Elegance
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

I can understand your concern. I am a new member and I don't know how the rating scheme works in practice. However, the system notes indicated that the 90-99 range was for an excellent site. I've visited a number of sites whose rating here was in the mid-90's and I feel that this site is better. It's my opinion and you certainly don't have to trust it. I did post what I think are the most relevant data both plus and minus. That was the most information I was willing to take the time to assemble. If the review was inadequate, I hope the owners of this site will pull it. On the other hand, I think it does describe the site fairly well.

10-17-08  04:36pm


Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.65 seconds.