| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
This is a perfect example of why I don't often jump on a site that's outside my "favorite few". Thanks for putting up a warning to anyone who might have been considering joining this ripoff of a site.
|
04-18-13 03:49pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Usually when I've jumped in without a review or a comment I've wound up disappointed. I won't say I'll never do it again, but for the most part, I wait to get some feedback on here before signing up at a new site.
|
04-17-13 04:39pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always. Like any other product, don't we all look for value? To me, if a site charges the usual $30 a month and doesn't deliver quality comparable to other sites, that's points off. Video/picture quality, the amount of content online, the update schedule, and the money I'm paying for it, all factor into it.
|
04-09-13 06:52pm
|
Reply
29
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
In my mind, picture sets and videos should always contain at least the model's name and/or a title that uniquely identifies them.
*********
On a completely unrelated topic and while I've got your attention - can I ask that you please do away with the music intros and outros on your videos? I think they really hurt what is otherwise really good material.
|
04-07-13 08:40pm
|
Reply
30
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
I definitely agree - sites should at least name their files. It just doesn't seem like such a big deal and makes no sense that they don't.
I don't know how the renaming utility that you're using works, but with the one I suggested, the only real pain is having to type out the name of the zip file each time. Once named and extracted, BRU will use the folder name as a prefix. "Model name" becomes Model name 001, Model name 002, etc. Then again, you're on a Mac, so unless you use a Windoze emulator, I guess that's out.
I'm seriously anti-update. I never set any program to auto update and only update when I lose functionality. It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure VLC will save your preferences if you manually remove the program when installing a newer version. If I remember correctly, there's an option you check or uncheck to save user preferences.
|
04-07-13 06:26am
|
Reply
31
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Review
For sites that don't bother to name files properly, you can greatly reduce the time needed to rename files by using a renaming app. It's still a bit of a pain but if you use the models name for each zip file as you're saving it, it's just a matter of using an app that will rename the pictures inside the extracted folder using the folder name as a prefix. I've been using Bulk Rename Utility for years and it really has helped in cases like this.
As far as the mp4 files go, I have to ask if your codecs are up to date. My PC isn't slow but it is several years old and I never had a problem with the playback. Have you tried VLC for Mac?
|
04-07-13 05:44am
|
Reply
32
|
Hairy Twatter
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Nice details, tangub. Thanks for the response!
|
04-07-13 05:32am
|
Reply
33
|
Cathy's Craving
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
That's a good wrap up of the site.
I can't imagine that they'd still be updating. I was last on this site several years back and Cathy was already looking pretty tired and not into it like she used to be. To her credit, I don't think too many people - man or woman - could fuck for years and not be worn out by it.
|
04-06-13 04:27am
|
Reply
34
|
Yanks.com
(3)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
I'm dropping the score. The updates in the last six days were:
4 biographies - two of them back-to-back
5 photo sets - one of which is a low resolution Girls Out West set
One short non-nude interview
And one full-length video.
If the photo sets were of better quality, this might not be so bad, but they're just not that great. Believe it or not, I'd still recommend the site for a first time join, but after that, it's just not all that.
|
04-06-13 04:19am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
One of the reasons I tend to stick to the same few sites over and over again is because I don't trust tours. I know I'm not the only one it's happened to, but I've been burned by trusting a site to tell me what they're all about. If I do want to venture outside my "trusted few", I look here first to see if anybody's got anything to say about a site.
|
04-06-13 03:56am
|
Reply
36
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think it's just a matter of being resistant to change and being sold on CCBill and Epoch. Besides never having had an issue with them, they've actually refunded my money for sites that were blatant ripoffs. I guess I just stay with what I know works.
|
04-05-13 04:47pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I definitely do - unless I don't. Then again, it's a some time thing with me which really is none of your business.
And, for those that were wondering, this poll was my idea for an April Fools joke. Yes, I will always be as easily amused as I am easily pissed off!
|
04-01-13 08:51pm
|
Reply
38
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
LeluLove Co's Reply
Thanks, Lelu - That's good to know.
That takes care of the #2 issue. Now I have to clear up the #1 problem - money.
I'll be there one of these days... or weeks... or months...
|
04-01-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
39
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the quick response.
Believe me - if I joined, there would definitely be a review. Unfortunately, there are two problems I can see.
1) Money for porn isn't so easy right now and
2) I won't join a site through Zombaio.
That's a shame because I've been looking for something new and, with amateurs being my thing, I'd probably like what I'd see here.
|
04-01-13 02:31pm
|
Reply
40
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
One detail that concerns a pet peeve of mine. TBP says the watermark is medium sized. I've seen sites where "medium" looks like large and distracting to me. What's the logo here look like? Is it bright or subdued in color? Is it stuck in a corner where (I think) they all should be? An overbearing watermark can really kill an otherwise good video. ARE YOU LISTENING SCORE HD?
|
04-01-13 10:57am
|
Reply
41
|
Yanks.com
(3)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks, CT. I try! :cheesy grin:
|
04-01-13 09:52am
|
Reply
42
|
Yanks.com
(3)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You're welcome, Denner - and thanks for the compliment. Yeah - despite the shortcomings, it's definitely one to check out if you've never been there before.
|
04-01-13 09:52am
|
Reply
43
|
Yanks.com
(3)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
A NICE ADDENDUM:
Upon cancelling, I was prompted to explain why I was cancelling and took the opportunity to explain most of the above. Despite my criticisms, the response I got was positive and well-taken, although I will say it doesn't really change how I feel about the site. The horrible economy are what force the ad placement and the inability to update more full-length content. The interviews, I'm told, are just one of those things that people either love or hate. I just happen to be in the hate category. And the tattoos and piercings are just a trend that's growing and getting harder to avoid. I can accept all the responses I got from Billie (webmistress) as very valid and I appreciate the quick response I got from her. But, again, this site is ever so close to what I'm looking for - but it does fall short in my eyes. Maybe time will tell and things here will swing more towards what I'm looking for.
|
03-29-13 01:17pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
No. Guns belong with angel wings and picture frames - anywhere but in porn.
|
03-24-13 12:49am
|
Reply
45
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I think you're right. And, if I'm not mistaken, it's happened with this site before.
|
03-22-13 10:39am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'll mirror slutty's and jb's comments.
If the interviewer is being an asshole, it's fast forward time. And, like jb said, it depends on what they're talking about. I really don't care what color car she drives or what he had for lunch before the shoot.
|
03-22-13 07:36am
|
Reply
47
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
sissyrich's Review
Congratulations on breaking the record for shortest reviews. But I'm pretty sure that there are at least a couple of people on here who would like to see to some more details about the site to back up that perfect score.
|
03-21-13 07:11am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, damn. Now we have to do a "because". Can't just click Yes and be done with it. : - )
So... Let's see... how to explain this...
I've been telling people for years that I'm a blatant heterosexual - been queer for women all my life. The female form appeals to me on many levels. I guess you could say I have an appreciation of the biology of women. I'm a guy. I can't get pregnant. Women can. I want to see it!
Does that make sense?
|
03-20-13 12:13am
|
Reply
49
|
Brazzers
(7)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
You might notice that the reviews for those two sites weren't done by the same person. Tastes and ratings do vary from person to person. And I certainly wouldn't quibble over a two point difference.
As was suggested in a reply to your comment about Ass Traffic, why don't you put up reviews of both Brazzers and Reality Kings, with your opinion and what you consider to be a fair scores?
|
03-20-13 12:05am
|
Reply
50
|
Lactation Fantasy
(1)
|
Reply of
GUY22's Review
A dead on review - especially about that damn banner sized watermark. I like the content enough, but I won't go back to any site that feels the need to brand their material with huge watermarks.
|
03-19-13 11:55pm
|
