| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Nude In SF
(1)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Wow! I joined here 2-3 years ago and, going by your review, nothing much has changed - not even the amount of content (by much). If it's still a small site, something's really wrong.
|
04-29-13 09:43pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Figures... So far I'm the only one who says anything BUT high heels. No wonder they're in damn near every scene.
|
04-29-13 12:56pm
|
Reply
3
|
Silvia Saint
(1)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Fantastic review, lk
I have to say I was surprised to see Silvia's name while scrolling through the reviews. I figured she'd be long gone from the screen by now. If she's still looking good, she's got to know something others in the industry don't. I've seen women looking worn out after only a few years in the biz.
|
04-28-13 07:10pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Definitely site dependent.
I've had everything from quick responses with offers of subscription extensions, to being told every problem was my fault, to (of course) no response at all.
|
04-27-13 03:28pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have enough years behind me that a good number of the 20-somethings look too young to me. If a model looks really young, enough to make me question her legal status, I just check the 2257 declaration and I'm good with it. But that thought doesn't really cross my mind with major studios and websites.
|
04-25-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
With all the rabid football fans in Baltimore, Maryland, I revived an old interest in the Washington Redskins - but it's really just to piss people off. I couldn't care less who wins or loses. I wear maroon and gold in the land of purple and black just to see the reactions of people who take the game WAY too seriously. The real sport I'm dedicated to is trying to land a spot on the Olympic Downloading Team.
|
04-24-13 02:16am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I see the United States putting some form of legislation through that restricts porn in some way. I don't see much of a change in store for the rest of the world.
|
04-22-13 02:34pm
|
Reply
8
|
Candy Christopher
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
This is another site where I wish the webmaster would chime in to defend their content. But I guess we all know better - 300 x 200 pictures? Last I checked, this isn't 1985.
Isn't it funny how the crappiest sites are the hardest to review?
|
04-20-13 07:39am
|
Reply
9
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
Since they're deleting negative feedback it's doubtful that they'd actually do it, but I would contact them at the end of my subscription and invite them to comment on your comments here.
|
04-20-13 07:15am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What Drooler said.
|
04-20-13 07:08am
|
Reply
11
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
This is a perfect example of why I don't often jump on a site that's outside my "favorite few". Thanks for putting up a warning to anyone who might have been considering joining this ripoff of a site.
|
04-18-13 03:49pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Usually when I've jumped in without a review or a comment I've wound up disappointed. I won't say I'll never do it again, but for the most part, I wait to get some feedback on here before signing up at a new site.
|
04-17-13 04:39pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always. Like any other product, don't we all look for value? To me, if a site charges the usual $30 a month and doesn't deliver quality comparable to other sites, that's points off. Video/picture quality, the amount of content online, the update schedule, and the money I'm paying for it, all factor into it.
|
04-09-13 06:52pm
|
Reply
14
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
In my mind, picture sets and videos should always contain at least the model's name and/or a title that uniquely identifies them.
*********
On a completely unrelated topic and while I've got your attention - can I ask that you please do away with the music intros and outros on your videos? I think they really hurt what is otherwise really good material.
|
04-07-13 08:40pm
|
Reply
15
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
I definitely agree - sites should at least name their files. It just doesn't seem like such a big deal and makes no sense that they don't.
I don't know how the renaming utility that you're using works, but with the one I suggested, the only real pain is having to type out the name of the zip file each time. Once named and extracted, BRU will use the folder name as a prefix. "Model name" becomes Model name 001, Model name 002, etc. Then again, you're on a Mac, so unless you use a Windoze emulator, I guess that's out.
I'm seriously anti-update. I never set any program to auto update and only update when I lose functionality. It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure VLC will save your preferences if you manually remove the program when installing a newer version. If I remember correctly, there's an option you check or uncheck to save user preferences.
|
04-07-13 06:26am
|
Reply
16
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Review
For sites that don't bother to name files properly, you can greatly reduce the time needed to rename files by using a renaming app. It's still a bit of a pain but if you use the models name for each zip file as you're saving it, it's just a matter of using an app that will rename the pictures inside the extracted folder using the folder name as a prefix. I've been using Bulk Rename Utility for years and it really has helped in cases like this.
As far as the mp4 files go, I have to ask if your codecs are up to date. My PC isn't slow but it is several years old and I never had a problem with the playback. Have you tried VLC for Mac?
|
04-07-13 05:44am
|
Reply
17
|
Hairy Twatter
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Nice details, tangub. Thanks for the response!
|
04-07-13 05:32am
|
Reply
18
|
Cathy's Craving
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
That's a good wrap up of the site.
I can't imagine that they'd still be updating. I was last on this site several years back and Cathy was already looking pretty tired and not into it like she used to be. To her credit, I don't think too many people - man or woman - could fuck for years and not be worn out by it.
|
04-06-13 04:27am
|
Reply
19
|
Yanks.com
(3)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
I'm dropping the score. The updates in the last six days were:
4 biographies - two of them back-to-back
5 photo sets - one of which is a low resolution Girls Out West set
One short non-nude interview
And one full-length video.
If the photo sets were of better quality, this might not be so bad, but they're just not that great. Believe it or not, I'd still recommend the site for a first time join, but after that, it's just not all that.
|
04-06-13 04:19am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
One of the reasons I tend to stick to the same few sites over and over again is because I don't trust tours. I know I'm not the only one it's happened to, but I've been burned by trusting a site to tell me what they're all about. If I do want to venture outside my "trusted few", I look here first to see if anybody's got anything to say about a site.
|
04-06-13 03:56am
|
Reply
21
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think it's just a matter of being resistant to change and being sold on CCBill and Epoch. Besides never having had an issue with them, they've actually refunded my money for sites that were blatant ripoffs. I guess I just stay with what I know works.
|
04-05-13 04:47pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I definitely do - unless I don't. Then again, it's a some time thing with me which really is none of your business.
And, for those that were wondering, this poll was my idea for an April Fools joke. Yes, I will always be as easily amused as I am easily pissed off!
|
04-01-13 08:51pm
|
Reply
23
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
LeluLove Co's Reply
Thanks, Lelu - That's good to know.
That takes care of the #2 issue. Now I have to clear up the #1 problem - money.
I'll be there one of these days... or weeks... or months...
|
04-01-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
24
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the quick response.
Believe me - if I joined, there would definitely be a review. Unfortunately, there are two problems I can see.
1) Money for porn isn't so easy right now and
2) I won't join a site through Zombaio.
That's a shame because I've been looking for something new and, with amateurs being my thing, I'd probably like what I'd see here.
|
04-01-13 02:31pm
|
Reply
25
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
One detail that concerns a pet peeve of mine. TBP says the watermark is medium sized. I've seen sites where "medium" looks like large and distracting to me. What's the logo here look like? Is it bright or subdued in color? Is it stuck in a corner where (I think) they all should be? An overbearing watermark can really kill an otherwise good video. ARE YOU LISTENING SCORE HD?
|
04-01-13 10:57am
|
