| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not as a rule, If a site is unusually cheap or expensive I will though.
|
03-04-12 01:26am
|
Reply
27
|
Body Parts.biz
(2)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Interesting review. I agree with your criticisms, but it is still an interesting site, but only for a one time sign up.
|
03-04-12 01:23am
|
Reply
28
|
African Goddesses
(1)
|
Reply of
TheSquirrel's Reply
Tjhanks for your kind words. I have a few reviews left to write up.
|
03-04-12 01:21am
|
Reply
29
|
African Goddesses
(1)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It was good to hear from you. There are downloads but no choice of format. Ichanged the wording in my review. Thanks for noticing my mistake in wording
|
02-23-12 12:46pm
|
Reply
30
|
Body Parts.biz
(2)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Yes it has character. I agree. However, the extreme closeup approach left me feeling that I was not looking at a whole person, just generic parts. I liked the site, but it is not one I would rejoin.
|
02-23-12 12:07am
|
Reply
31
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pantsmulligan's Comment
I was a member a few years ago, so recently I got an offer from them of a discounted membership. I was considering going back. Can you tell me the specs on the latest updates?
|
02-22-12 11:58pm
|
Reply
32
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Ihave never been a member, so I appreciate your very complete review. I feel as though I was there. Thanks
|
02-22-12 11:56pm
|
Reply
33
|
Bound Gangbangs
(4)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
I have joined several kink sites and like the sex. Our tastes differ, but you mentioned the high production values. That is very true. Also, they are top notch in customer service. If you like their material, no other sites can compare.
|
02-22-12 11:53pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I put no. It doesn't interest me and I have never joined a network that included a gay site.
|
02-22-12 11:50pm
|
Reply
35
|
African Goddesses
(1)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thank you for your nice words. It is always a pleasure to hear from you.
|
02-22-12 11:49pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I am pickier, but that comes form having seen a ton of porn over many years. I am think I am more knowledgeable as a result.
|
02-12-12 09:15am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I rarely find any interesting. If they were well done, but usually they are not.
|
02-12-12 09:13am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually consider it over a few days. I read reviews, but often choose sites that others have not reviewed.
|
02-12-12 09:11am
|
Reply
39
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
selphy's Review
Considering about 250 quality videos are on the site, I would have no complaints. That is a lot, when you take into account that this is a niche that is catered to by very few sites. While I have not joined this site, by its reputation and your positive comments, I am sure I would give it a higher score.
|
02-12-12 09:07am
|
Reply
40
|
Josh Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
foxtails's Review
I reviewed the site a while back. At that time it did not have a link to write to the webmaster. I found his email through PU and he never addressed my problem. A video had a glitch in it and broke at an interesting point. I downloaded it five times with no better results. He never wrote back.
I also thought that the videos would be better with more stretching and a bit more of the explicit.
|
02-12-12 09:01am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I have given kink sites that are new some high scores as well. Knowing their reputation, I expect that with more updates the quality will remain high. As a rule, you cannot predict that with other new sites. Some update rarely and may never keep up the intial quality, so I checked NO.
|
02-12-12 08:58am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not at all. I think pregnant models do not have a place in porn.
|
01-19-12 03:44pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes. I often go with no more than a 1280x720 becasue of file size. Midrange HD is fine for me.
|
01-19-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The content is much more important, but I do care. If a webmaster is concerned about customers, I consider it a big plus.
|
01-19-12 03:42pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
None. You pay for the site and should be able to do whatever you want as far as downloading. If the site has a problem, they don't get any sympathy from me.
|
01-19-12 03:41pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Hate them. I think they are a waste of time and not worth viewing.
|
01-19-12 03:40pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Former President Bush thought that Central America was places like Ohio and Indiana and South America included Alabama and Mississippi.
|
01-19-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
48
|
HQ Upskirt
(1)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
They did a really good job of making them look unstaged. Who knows?
|
01-18-12 07:11pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I give positive ratings as encouragement. I want PU to grow.
|
12-03-11 04:46am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Any time is a good time for porn.
|
12-03-11 04:45am
|
