| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Might be because i'm such a stickler for typos and errors anyway. I even hate it when i make typos on my reviews.
|
03-27-07 07:13am
|
Reply
27
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Yep. Reading reviews here is getting expensive. I keep joining new sites.
|
03-26-07 07:06pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Poll
Mastastia, tara-TS (which is well known and huge), pornotopia (ditto). It's a bummer. i could have been top reviewer in Jan. makes me want to cry ...
|
03-26-07 06:37pm
|
Reply
29
|
Club Stroke
(0)
|
Reply of
YanksAngel's Reply
Interesting yanks. I can see where you'd want clarification from this reviewer, but me, personally I'd have stopped a bit short of saying someone who is not into gay porn is homophobic. I'd say most likely that makes them not interested.
|
03-23-07 08:23pm
|
Reply
30
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(1)
|
Reply of
Raven's Reply
Good point. I do hope that's what I was able to reflect in the review. That older videos are obviously going to be slightly lower quality. But I'll take the minor inconvenice if it means I have a ton of content to sort through. Makes it more likely I'm going to find more favorites.
|
03-23-07 11:49am
|
Reply
31
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
Glad to see it cleared up. It is a shame though that none of the 100% reviewers bothered to stick around and add a few reviews of their own. Might have been nice to see what else they were into.
|
03-22-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
32
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
turismo's Review
Helpful review. Especially since I'd wanted to join GGG for several years now, but after seeing that it's DRM I will settle for other sites!
|
03-22-07 02:12pm
|
Reply
33
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
Always enjoy your reviews mudman, even when I disagree. I do agree combined with ifeelmyself, this would be a top notch site. Was wondering if you found anything about the join options that seemed unusually difficult. That's what has kept me from joining so far. The sort of half membership vs. full membership option.
|
03-20-07 06:36pm
|
Reply
34
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
ditto to that. Hegre is a photographer.
|
03-18-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
35
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
Great review! But why don't the models jump off the computer and fuck you? That's a serious con.
|
03-17-07 01:58pm
|
Reply
36
|
Naughty At Home
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Great review. Joined today based on it and you're 100% right.
|
01-15-07 06:35pm
|
Reply
37
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
lol, you know what i mean.
|
01-11-07 07:10pm
|
Reply
38
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
cerebral's Comment
Ha, having read that I went straight to monster cocks looking for Faith. You were not wrong!
|
01-09-07 06:04pm
|
Reply
39
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
Appreciate the feedback just the same. And is it me or do we probably subscribe to way too much porn?
|
01-09-07 10:46am
|
Reply
40
|
Christine Young
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
I agree. So much potential. What could have been ...
|
01-09-07 10:10am
|
Reply
41
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
I can tell you weren't impresed with the site, neither was I. Moostly dissapointed. But a 30? If I gave a site a 30, I'd probably have nothing in the pro section at all. Or my bottom line would be "If you like flat chested teen sites ... still don't join!"
|
01-09-07 10:04am
|
Reply
42
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
Decent point there, I was unimpressed with the content a few months ago, but 106 sets is quite a bit. It's still getting no score of 90 from me. Not with 1998-quality video. But I'll update my review.
|
01-09-07 09:59am
|
Reply
43
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
np, I'll take a compliment twice!
|
01-08-07 06:44pm
|
Reply
44
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks. I figure, i spent all this money belonging to the sites, i should do something productive. Great site!
|
01-08-07 03:47pm
|
