| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Sound like good review. I like new models and see release of old models to. New models like Faye Reagan,
Jaylee, Olivia Roche, Blue Angel, Raven, Klaudia are best.
Great bonus of Kacey yes and she got great big vagina. Email Alex for model request for old model and he reply. I emailed for requests of Ember and Alex posted all new set.
|
01-19-08 07:22am
|
Reply
2
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Divit you sound like crying baby that got milk taken away. 65 score is very bad so you are just mad – not above average review like you say. You want alscan with above average review then change number to 85-90. Alsscan is one of best sites on internet and maybe best which should be 90-100 review. I have been member of over 150 sites what about you? Alscans has more content and better quality pictures and video than anybody I see. I count more than 75 percent of video are masturbation or girlgirl video. Below 25 percent is photoshoot video that is labeled. You do not like Alex voice then do not download photoshoot video. I like photoshoot video to and it show real girl. Still more video on site than 95% of other internet sites. Alsscan do not release photos in piece. Scenes have 2 or 3 theames. Some glamore with little and no insertion. Some explicit with lot of insertion and different toy and sometime fist. Each photo release completes set in order. I do not talk good English, I just no good porn.
Your review just seen as angry baby review. Nobody believe 65 score review.
|
01-19-08 07:11am
|
Reply
3
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
Davit's Reply
I do wish for Boy-Girl on site. Then it would be 100 score. It is best site for content and quality. I have big monitor to see all quality and compare. alscan is best of all in video and photo.
|
01-19-08 07:08am
|
Reply
4
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree width you. This site dissapoints. They have good site design and promotion but bad product. Webmaster/Camera guy ruins video and pictures. Compatition so much better now. Read my honest review.
|
12-20-07 01:37pm
|
Reply
5
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That why I was so mad at TBP people for there false review. Because of TBP I waste my money and now do not trust site reviews. Maybe Ftv pay people to get high review.
I try best to give good propper review of sites and be honest. You do good reviews and should review Ftv. Not many updates for money made me most sad and I for got to list bandwidth limit as bad to. It is over I just move on to much better sites.
|
12-18-07 01:47pm
|
Reply
6
|
FTV Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
What is a leap-frogged? Much of competation is better and Ftv just start HD video. Competation has years more HD better video for members than Ftv which is better. I join many sites and Ftv not worth money any more and only update site every 5-7 days. Sorry for not so good English but you now what I say is true.
|
12-18-07 08:19am
|
Reply
7
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Nice Review. I agree met-art is best glamore site, but sometimes want more explicit. Me and you have Met-art and alsscan reversed. For me alsscans have higher photo and video quality width better glamour plus hardcore. We agree both sites are top of class and I agree with your nice met-art review. Just not so high score.
|
12-15-07 06:31am
|
Reply
8
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Maybe I do not say right. Not asking for insertion but just more
pink and open shots can be just as sexy. Some of Met-art copy sites do this better, but those sites are not consistant as much updates or overall quality. Soft = playboy, but met-art should me playboy plus more pink to me better for me.
|
12-10-07 06:02pm
|
Reply
9
|
Ron Harris
(1)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
I heard from before Ron was a older man so you might be right. He is a good photographer and probably been shooting many years. Good artsy photography. I do not agree site is similar to ftv girls. Ron Harris site is much better. ftv has amature photography and video that is not much in focus and Ron is a profressional. Ron does have not to good site design inside members section. ftv has better site design. At times Ron does not seem nice to girls but maybe they do not work hard enough so he gets mad.
|
12-03-07 01:31pm
|
Reply
10
|
Simon Scans
(1)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Good Review and it is accurate. Videos are very boring and site going downhill. It was much better tree years ago or maybe rest of adult internet sites have got better. Simon Scans has not improved and maybe got worse. definatly not worth price.
|
12-03-07 05:41am
|
Reply
11
|
ALS Scan
(2)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
Do not beleve review. This site is one of best on
the internet. I joined over 100 site in 10 years and this site has best girls, best video, best picture quality. Some shots are very vaginal, that is true. Most shots are glamure. He must not be member, old videos are available.
This persons review is not to be trusted. Look at other reviews.
|
11-27-07 05:22am
|
