Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (20)  

Feedback:   All (176)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (153)

Other:   Replies Received (60)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 153 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I know a guy who specializes in pre-1995 and vintage, VHS, mags, reels, whatever, so hit me up if you are interested.

02-08-15  06:59pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I usually focus on the peeing content, but I get it all. I can't imagine the size of my collection if I downloaded literally everything from every site I joined.

02-08-15  06:36am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Playback dimensions should be 720 horizontal pixels for HD and 1080 horizontal pixels for 1080P or "True HD." The only caveat is that you can't sample raw video shot at a lower resolution of 720 or 1980P and still call it HD.

02-06-15  09:06am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

I may rephrase this poll in the future, because I didn't mean DRM in the traditional sense, I just meant a hidden watermark to identify each downloader.

02-01-15  06:31am

Reply
30
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of EverNight's Review

"I also believe many of the "PornstarPunishment" videos that I understand had been removed at one time have been put back into the archive however they appear to have received some edits."

Can you give an example of one of these? I am a member at Brazzers right now, so I would be curious to check this out.


01-31-15  07:45pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

If you do this right, they can't be removed. You place a watermark that is unique to each user, and it consists of very subtle color alterations of the pixels comprising the watermark, which can be off to the corner somewhere. You would never be able to see the effect of this.

If the webmaster wants to identify the downloader of a given image, all they have to do is subtract the pixels of their un-watermarked master copy from the watermarked image.

This cannot be decoded or removed without the master file, so there would be no way to defeat it.

Again, I would be fine with this. I once saw it implemented really badly though, with a semi-translucent alphanumeric code watermark right in the middle of the field of view. Ugh!


01-31-15  02:19pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Just to clarify, I don't mean DRM in the sense that you can't copy or view it without any restrictions. I just mean they added an invisible watermark or some other means of identifying each downloader on a master list.

I have joined a few sites that did this, and it doesn't bother me. You've got nothing to worry about as long as you don't pirate the content. As long as you are not pirating the content, then the only way anyone could use the codes to identify you is if they found the porn on your hard drive, but in that case I think they would know its yours anyways.

I'm surprised more sites haven't done this. I've seen sites close, with the owners complaining about the usual, no money in porn, piracy, etc, yet they never tried anything like this.


01-31-15  10:05am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.

01-27-15  08:20pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

None of the above, although girls getting cosmetic surgery when they don't really need it is kind of a shame.

01-27-15  02:09pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.

01-26-15  07:01pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.

01-25-15  06:06pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.

Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:

PornstarPunishment.com

This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.

SickPuppy.com

They constantly posted about all the pressure from credit card processors, now almost all of their content is removed.

WatersportsSluts.com (Hard Glam Network)

Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.

Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.

YellowDiscipline.com

It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.


There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.

Veronica-Moser.com

This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.


01-25-15  11:43am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have hundreds of sites in mind I would like to join, so for me it's just a matter of what's next. I rarely see a site for the first time and join as an impulse buy.

01-25-15  09:43am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.

My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.


01-24-15  07:37am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.

It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.


01-23-15  08:49pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I definitely do, as long as it is something I would have downloaded in the first place. That's why I say get it while the getting's good. You never know what will be there tomnorrow.

01-23-15  02:09pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I use Bulk Image Downloader for photo sets that aren't in zips. I haven't tried IDM yet. Does it let you queue up all the downloads you want, then basically just walk away while it does the work?

01-15-15  06:31pm

Reply
43
Visit Rubber Tanja

Rubber Tanja
(0)
Reply of Ergodex's Comment

Actually, there are more videos missing than this. Check your email, I PM'd you.

01-11-15  02:01pm

Reply
44
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
Reply of mike11w's Comment

Are her solo peeing scenes gone? If that's the case, I don't think I'll join.

01-11-15  07:25am

Reply
45
Visit Rubber Tanja

Rubber Tanja
(0)
Reply of Ergodex's Comment

The videos missing were a 3 part series titled in order:

Rubber clinic masturbation and pussy licking
Naughty rubber cleaning girls
Vaginal rubber treatment

There was nothing out of the ordinary in them for content, and the models Tanja and Lena feature regularly in their other videos. I can only speculate, but there doesn't seem to have been a reason for them to remove these particular videos. They did renovate their site, and sometimes content gets lost accidentally in those situations.


01-11-15  07:17am

Reply
46
Visit Twistys Network

Twistys Network
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

I'll check it out the next time I'm at Twistys. Someone once told me their older peeing shoots were amazing, so my curiosity is piqued. Also, I think all of Twistys' peeing shoots were pre-2007, including Justine Joli and Amber Michaels.

01-10-15  06:08pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

"So tell me, is there something you know that I don't?"

Nope. The two sites I downloaded in their final state right before closing happened purely by chance. I wish there were a way of knowing, like if sites had going out of business sales, but it's usually impossible to predict.


01-10-15  07:22am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Despite the wide range of responses to the poll, it seems all us commenters are in agreement.

01-09-15  04:18pm

Reply
49
Visit Twistys Network

Twistys Network
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review

"You need to upgrade to see all the older / oldest content they have." (Wittyguy)

Can you give more details on this please? I recently joined Twistys for two reasons - Justine Joli and Amber Michaels peeing. I found what I was looking for. I also heard that Twistys had more peeing content than this in the past, but I could not find it. Support blew off my request for help.


01-09-15  03:44pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I was sort of a member of the sites girl-e-girls.com and sweet-e-girls.com when they closed down. They were photography sites with French models from the early 2000's by a photographer who went by Rafik. I downloaded everything that I wanted in my month of membership, then cancelled. I noticed that they were rotating content, so I was a little disappointed that I couldn't get everything possible in that time. I tried to contact the webmaster about it, but I got no reply. Instead, when I re-visited the site to see the previews of the shoots that had rotated back in, I noticed that my login was still active. I double checked, and I was not getting any rebills, but the login just stayed active indefinitely. So I got to keep access for long enough for all of their shoots to rotate through, and then the sites went down.

I was also once a member of a site when they announced that they were forced to remove about 1/3 of their content, including most of their peeing shoots, by their payment processor Verotel and VISA. I was beyond upset for so much great porn to be taken down just a day before I would download it. The webmaster was unreachable. In one last ditch effort, I noticed that while the links to those shoots were gone from the site, the URLs were predictable for all of them, and I was able to get them all anyway because they were still on the server! There was a huge thrill to it that came from recovering something great that had been discarded and was otherwise fated to be lost.

The funny thing about porn is, you sometimes really don't know what you've got until it's gone. We've all seen posts here from users who tossed some VHS or DVDs or deleted content from some sites, only to regret it deeply later when that content is rare and unavailable anywhere.

It's a cliche among artists that works of art don't approach their fullest value until after the artist is dead. There will be no new works, and the number available to collectors will only decrease. It's too bad that the same isn't true of porn, and that there isn't an established marketplace where owners of content from sites that have closed can sell content at a large premium to dedicated collectors. I've taken it on myself to make this type of purchase a number of times, but I feel I'm largely alone in buying rare porn at a premium when your average guy just goes for the free stuff.


01-09-15  11:44am


Shown : 26-50 of 153 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.57 seconds.