Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : xexbot (36)  

Feedback:   All (80)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (49)

Other:   Replies Received (61)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 49 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

That is much more of a cultural issue than a legal issue. Sort of the same way US Americans might be perceived as preferring violence over sex or love if you try to judge us by our most popular mediums. I can kill 50 people in a movie and still get a PG rating, but one quick peek at a cock or vagina is likely to prevent your movie from receiving a rating at all, and therefore no distribution. Definitely not our place to judge anyone else's practices.

08-31-12  07:59am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love perving on the streets. LOL. This is the time of year when you can walk around with dark sunglasses on behind chicks in bikinis.

06-11-12  08:18am

Reply
3
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

A most excellent review. Very thorough. I have thought about joining this site before, now I may go ahead and do it. Thanks.

06-11-12  11:16pm

Reply
4
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

That does sound like so BS. Sorry to hear that. I have had no problems with them, but I did join after the split. In fact, the split is what kept me from joining for so long because I was basically interested in about half of what they offered in each.

I won't try to defend them and I certainly understand your frustration. At the same time as big as these sites and this network is getting, the split was inevitable. The alternative would have probably been to start raising the prices. From a sales-perspective, that very well could have been a death sentence for their business. It's really hard to get people to join sites for over twenty dollars these days. I think they screwed up in how they divided the site. They should have made 21 Sextreme an actual addition, because that's really what it is anyway, and just charged an extra ten bucks a month to add it on. Or they could have made it more "extreme" period so that it can stand on its own.


07-30-12  12:33pm

Reply
5
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Personally I am a fan of wmv hd files myself. They are a little smaller and I don't notice that big of a diff in terms of quality. They do also do mp4 as well. The big issue now, like I said, is that now to get the standard HD quality we have all come to know and love you are having to do files over 1gb.

07-30-12  10:20am

Reply
6
Visit 3D Maxxx

3D Maxxx
(0)
Reply of shmeagles's Review

Wow, thanks for the heads up. That sort of business practice really ticks me off.

04-21-12  07:21pm

Reply
7
Visit Alternadudes

Alternadudes
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

I think I'm bi, but maybe I'm just Tri. LOL

08-09-12  01:40pm

Reply
8
Visit Alternadudes

Alternadudes
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review

Excellent review. Thank you for reviewing a gay site. I find I tend to only join or look at gay sites that are associated with other networks sites like 21 Sextreme or something. So, it is nice to see a review of a standalone gay site. Thanks again.

08-08-12  11:37am

Reply
9
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

My dlm only seems to have a problem on the home/update pages of ATK sites, where they post the most recent vids and pics. If I go to the model's individual page/gallery with all of her stuff, my dlm doesn't seem to have the problem. Since the home/update page changes everyday I can see where this may be a problem for dlms. Of course all of the bigger money sites are starting to rotate the addresses of their videos to prevent site raping. Another annoying thing I have been seeing is where you cannot continue browsing once you start downloading. Ferro Network does this.

06-21-12  11:47pm

Reply
10
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

I personally only run into this problem with the new videos off the front pages in ATK Hairy. That makes sense because each video is listed under a new day each time. From the model's actual gallery page, I don't have as much problem. Maybe it has something to do with the actual age of the model's page itself???

06-21-12  11:30am

Reply
11
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Review

Great review. I am a huge fan of anything ATK does. I also like the fact that they stole the Taekwondo organization's name. LOL. You are absolutely right about repeat modeling. Sativa Verde just did a live cam show for ATK Hairy and was talkingabout that very thing. She started as model working for anyone, fell in love with working for ATK, now she is shooting models herself for them. I also like the fact that girls that appear in Galleria may wind up in Hairy at some point, and vice versa.

Now they are offering a big deal where you can get access to all their sites for like a hundred a month. It's a steep price, but for me, it has always been a tough choice between all their sites.


06-21-12  11:27am

Reply
12
Visit Bianca's Latex Lair

Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
Reply of LatexRyan's Review

Personally I think sites like this are very niche specific, as in you either go totally gaga over the girl or guy, or not. Sites like these are always hard to review because first and foremost you have to be a huge fan of the individual. This is partly how they justify the higher, fetish-level prices for sites like this. Good job on the review.

05-20-12  01:33pm

Reply
13
Visit Chaturbate

Chaturbate
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, I know, it gets creepy sometimes.

06-11-12  12:07am

Reply
14
Visit College Fuck Parties

College Fuck Parties
(0)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Review

Wow, this sounds like an awful site. I think I might have scored it even lower just from how you described the camera work in the videos. What's the point of having a variety of porn stars if all you see is their groins. It annoys me how easy it is for anyone to be a filmmaker these days because the technology is so simple now. Yet, there are still morons out there who can't even figure out how to work the zoom properly. Thanks for the heads up.

05-20-12  01:27pm

Reply
15
Visit Cuckold Me Now

Cuckold Me Now
(0)
Reply of Gazette Risque's Reply

The quality does vary from year to year, but for the most part, even the new stuff was pretty bad.

07-10-12  12:19pm

Reply
16
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

Thanks for that. I agree, it's hard to find male focused BDSM.

07-10-12  12:20pm

Reply
17
Visit Divine Breasts

Divine Breasts
(0)
Reply of BubbaGump's Review

Download limits are always suspicious to me. On the one hand I can see where a solo artist may do this just to try to keep people around an extra month. I mean, c'mon, a girl's gotta make a living and you kind of expect it from the sex trade industry. But then there's those sites that just look low-rent and shady, and I think you have found a great example of this.

06-11-12  11:22pm

Reply
18
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.

06-21-12  10:09am

Reply
19
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

I thought the same thing. It's like "jeez they're really proud of themselves." Yes, it's a little annoying, but I didn't find that it got in the way of anything.

Most people already cover the technical stuff on these forums and reviews, what's the point of repeating it. LOL.


02-12-12  12:09pm

Reply
20
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of james4096's Comment

You can join a lot of the individual sites for a 7.95 trial offer. That's what I did. I took one look at one site and said "Hell yeah I'll take the rest!" Anyway, if you join just one site, they have a different kind of loyalty program. You get to pick one bonus site, then if you stick around for a month you get to add another bonus site. Of course, by this time you're paying the thirty dollar a month charge, but you have to give them props for creating incentives. If you just want to see a couple join one with the trial and pick a different kind of site for the bonus and see what you think.

02-09-12  08:25pm

Reply
21
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)
Reply of Ergo Proxy's Reply

I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)

06-21-12  11:20am

Reply
22
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)
Reply of Ergo Proxy's Reply

I personally rank Abby Winters higher, though I certainly have lamented on some of the softcore issues with them in the past too. I do think their models are much better, I really like their business model, and overall I think they are one of the best sites on the net. The fact that they may be a little too softcore for my tastes doesn't detract from how I would rank them. But, I understand not everybody likes the same things too, so you certainly have a valid point. I think it's safe to say the more popular Aussie porn seems to be a hit or miss with everyone else.

04-21-12  04:53pm

Reply
23
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of op9527's Review

That's awesome that you and your wife do this together.

08-09-12  01:42pm

Reply
24
Visit Kink On Demand

Kink On Demand
(0)
Reply of insatiable's Review

I agree with you. Kink is renown for recycling. One thing everyone should know is that they don't do this on their actual sites. But if you get Kink content from somewhere like VideoBox or here, you will see they are just offering you a fairly respective sampling of the content from each of their sites. You will have a lot to choose from, it will just be more varied.

04-19-12  11:25pm

Reply
25
Visit Lesbea

Lesbea
(0)
Reply of monty2222's Review

Excellent review. I will be putting this one on my wish list

08-09-12  01:43pm


Shown : 1-25 of 49 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.21 seconds.