Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : xexbot (36)  

Feedback:   All (80)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (49)

Other:   Replies Received (61)  |   Trust Ratings (24)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-49 of 49 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.

06-21-12  10:09am

Reply
27
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I could see that. Their "tour" still has a lot of amateurish-looking material. Of course, some people may prefer that anyway. You're right, though, the models are all super, super hot.

06-11-12  11:28pm

Reply
28
Visit Tainster

Tainster
(1)
Reply of wildbillnj1975's Comment

Yes, this was major issue with this site. I wasn't a huge fan of the update methods either. basically you got a different angle of some mad sex party every day. These are some of the annoying aspects of Tainster.

06-11-12  11:26pm

Reply
29
Visit Divine Breasts

Divine Breasts
(0)
Reply of BubbaGump's Review

Download limits are always suspicious to me. On the one hand I can see where a solo artist may do this just to try to keep people around an extra month. I mean, c'mon, a girl's gotta make a living and you kind of expect it from the sex trade industry. But then there's those sites that just look low-rent and shady, and I think you have found a great example of this.

06-11-12  11:22pm

Reply
30
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

A most excellent review. Very thorough. I have thought about joining this site before, now I may go ahead and do it. Thanks.

06-11-12  11:16pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love perving on the streets. LOL. This is the time of year when you can walk around with dark sunglasses on behind chicks in bikinis.

06-11-12  08:18am

Reply
32
Visit Chaturbate

Chaturbate
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, I know, it gets creepy sometimes.

06-11-12  12:07am

Reply
33
Visit My Teen Oasis

My Teen Oasis
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Yeah, I have gotten access to most of those sites through other sites like this, I think through DevilsFilms. Mainly the lack of search capability keeps it from working well. At any rate, I totally agree with your scoring.

06-10-12  02:44am

Reply
34
Visit Bianca's Latex Lair

Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
Reply of LatexRyan's Review

Personally I think sites like this are very niche specific, as in you either go totally gaga over the girl or guy, or not. Sites like these are always hard to review because first and foremost you have to be a huge fan of the individual. This is partly how they justify the higher, fetish-level prices for sites like this. Good job on the review.

05-20-12  01:33pm

Reply
35
Visit College Fuck Parties

College Fuck Parties
(0)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Review

Wow, this sounds like an awful site. I think I might have scored it even lower just from how you described the camera work in the videos. What's the point of having a variety of porn stars if all you see is their groins. It annoys me how easy it is for anyone to be a filmmaker these days because the technology is so simple now. Yet, there are still morons out there who can't even figure out how to work the zoom properly. Thanks for the heads up.

05-20-12  01:27pm

Reply
36
Visit VCA XXX

VCA XXX
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Videobox does have a classics section, but it is mostly 1990s stuff.

I think a lot of sites stay away from them because the video quality is so bad they think people won't want them. Some of the more popular stars like Marilyn Chambers or Traci Lords might see their stuff remastered, but I doubt much effort will be spent on old porn.


05-07-12  10:22am

Reply
37
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(1)
Reply of pat362's Review

There is no excuse for poor quality photos on any site given today's technology. What is sounds like you are describing is someone who started a half-assed site, and never did anything to make it better. Thanks for the heads up.

05-07-12  10:17am

Reply
38
Visit VCA XXX

VCA XXX
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

This is a shame to here. I love classic porn and in particular a certain period in which VCA was very active. It seems like these films are almost public domain and wouldn't cost much for sites to stock, but I have yet to find a truly good classic porn site that didn't have a lot of the problems you mentioned here. Thanks for the heads up.

05-05-12  03:18pm

Reply
39
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(5)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review

I have always been iffy about this site because I personally get bored with their content after awhile. Like so many others, I find maybe one out of every ten videos worth the search. They do have a lot of content, I just never quite got on board with their style. Thanks for the review though, very informative.

05-05-12  03:15pm

Reply
40
Visit 3D Maxxx

3D Maxxx
(0)
Reply of shmeagles's Review

Wow, thanks for the heads up. That sort of business practice really ticks me off.

04-21-12  07:21pm

Reply
41
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)
Reply of Ergo Proxy's Reply

I personally rank Abby Winters higher, though I certainly have lamented on some of the softcore issues with them in the past too. I do think their models are much better, I really like their business model, and overall I think they are one of the best sites on the net. The fact that they may be a little too softcore for my tastes doesn't detract from how I would rank them. But, I understand not everybody likes the same things too, so you certainly have a valid point. I think it's safe to say the more popular Aussie porn seems to be a hit or miss with everyone else.

04-21-12  04:53pm

Reply
42
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Review

This another one of those sites I wasn't sure about, but your advice has helped me to make up my mind. Thanks for the great review.

04-20-12  05:06pm

Reply
43
Visit Pornstars Punishment

Pornstars Punishment
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Review

I have thought about subscribing to this site in the past, but I was concerned about some of the things you brought in your review. You confirmed a few suspicions, and enlightened me to a few things I didn't know. Thanks for the heads up.

04-20-12  05:04pm

Reply
44
Visit Kink On Demand

Kink On Demand
(0)
Reply of insatiable's Review

I agree with you. Kink is renown for recycling. One thing everyone should know is that they don't do this on their actual sites. But if you get Kink content from somewhere like VideoBox or here, you will see they are just offering you a fairly respective sampling of the content from each of their sites. You will have a lot to choose from, it will just be more varied.

04-19-12  11:25pm

Reply
45
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(3)
Reply of Abel Semen's Review

Ah, the age old not-enough-content dilemma. To subscribe or not to, that is the question. The problem here is you want sites like this to succeed, but you don't actually want o waste your own money if you think you'll get bored.

Personally, I say give them a try for a month, and see if you stick around longer. You can always leave a move on, come back a year later and maybe they've grown. OR, maybe their children are out on the streets starving and homeless because you canceled your subscription and ruined the company. Either way, at least you got to see some boobs.


04-19-12  10:40pm

Reply
46
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Review

Wow, thanks for pointing this out. I hate it when sites don't update. Fold them into an archive and lose the site if its dead.

04-19-12  10:10pm

Reply
47
Visit Subby Hubby

Subby Hubby
(0)
Reply of xexbot's Review

5gb/day download limit.

03-27-12  12:57am

Reply
48
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

I thought the same thing. It's like "jeez they're really proud of themselves." Yes, it's a little annoying, but I didn't find that it got in the way of anything.

Most people already cover the technical stuff on these forums and reviews, what's the point of repeating it. LOL.


02-12-12  12:09pm

Reply
49
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)
Reply of james4096's Comment

You can join a lot of the individual sites for a 7.95 trial offer. That's what I did. I took one look at one site and said "Hell yeah I'll take the rest!" Anyway, if you join just one site, they have a different kind of loyalty program. You get to pick one bonus site, then if you stick around for a month you get to add another bonus site. Of course, by this time you're paying the thirty dollar a month charge, but you have to give them props for creating incentives. If you just want to see a couple join one with the trial and pick a different kind of site for the bonus and see what you think.

02-09-12  08:25pm


Shown : 26-49 of 49 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.47 seconds.